"You don't have to apologize for being non-diverse anymore."
"You don't have to apologize for being non-diverse anymore."
Someone once described Graham as a parasite who takes on the traits of his host. When his host was McCain he was a war hawk who at least seemed principled because that was McCain. When McCain died, Trump became his new host.
I totally knew what this meant. No problems at all.
I love this thread so much. You should check out
cbgmag.com
Not people. Monsters.
I am solidly Gen X and have always been skeptical.
God, I'd never considered the parallels, but yes. Dude, you won. In all the ways. Go take a nap.
Okay junior. It's late I'm not wasting my time with someone who exists in an alternate reality. You have a good night.
Because no one ran on committing genocide.
So they prioritized their own sense of self-righteousness over helping people then. Because a vote in '24 wasnt going to impact what was happening in Gaza either way.
If you tell a kid boys liking other boys is okay, then that becomes normal to them. Thats what the parents are afraid of, that their kids won't share their biases.
I think that's a better question for the people who rejected Harris over Gaza. Because they clearly have a hierarchy that places Palestinians over literally every one else.
This is so dishonest. "Your vote won't help Gaza" โ "Your vote is meaningless." You could have helped immigrants in this country. You could have helped trans people. You could have helped the thousands of people impacted when USAID was shut down.
But that's not what you're arguing. You're arguing that voters have no agency. And you're only pushing accountability for one candidate.
Oops, you caught a typo. Guess you got me!
It is! It's just funny coming from someone like you. Its crazy to think you could look at the options in '24 and determine that the candidate that needed to face accountability...was Harris.
No. Its a stupid and irrelevant.
There was no resulting in the '24 election was going to change what was happening in Gaza. America has supported Israel for as long as Israel has existed. That wasn't changing, certainly not in the aftermath of October 7.
This question still isn't a relevant to this conversation. Voting for Harris threatened no one's rights.
That it is an incredible question considering the candidates we're talking about.
Thats not what I said. My point was that American voters who couldn't vote for Kamala because of Gaza not only didnt help anyone in Gaza, they helped make life worse for millions of other people.
What is this question related to?
Was the information hidden? Was it encrypted? I don't recall needing a secret decoder ring to understand who candidates were. Voters knew who the candidates were and they made a choice. People should be held accountable for their choices.
Good lord...there are many things to blame the media for, but people being too lazy to read is not one of them.
We've known who/Trump is for a decade. People voting for him had nothing to do with Harris. And if you're someone who couldn't vote for Harris because of Gaza, just know you didn't help a single Palestinian. You prioritized punishing Harris over actually helping anyone.
During any campaign, voters have access to information about the candidates. How they respond that information is entirely on the voters.
The Sopranos. An expertly written, wonderfully acted show about a bunch of people I couldn't give a damn about.
Oh man...I put about 30 hours into this and realized I didn't care enough to keep going.
Easy one...