13th #DesignInTech Report at @sxsw arrives in March schedule.sxsw.com/events/PP114...
24.01.2026 17:20
👍 5
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
13th #DesignInTech Report at @sxsw arrives in March schedule.sxsw.com/events/PP114...
2️⃣0️⃣2️⃣6️⃣🐴 editor.p5js.org/johnmaeda/fu...
“Design is the method of putting form and content together.” —Paul Rand
The form will follow. Start with the content.
Ref designobserver.com/thoughts-on-...
Design puts form and content together. But content comes first.
Good content enables meaningful design. Bad content enables malicious design.
Designers with a moral compass must fight for good content to exist. You can’t design meaning from garbage.
“You can’t change how you feel. But you can change what you do.” —a friend
---
Emotions can overwhelm in hard moments, no matter your experience. But actions are always a choice, even when feelings aren’t.
Success is hard to repeat because what got you there tends to go away once you achieve it.
Ego turns opportunities into actions, while egolessness helps you pick the right ones.
And to realize that my perception of that which is not my daily jam, is not necessarily so different. Not alien. Just me being too dumb to listen or to understand. Note to self.
I find that going to different places and exposing oneself to “alien” environments is the only thing to force, at least me, to switch to thinking hard.
Why does history repeat itself? Perhaps thinking hard is not our second nature.
When someone becomes some-thing, dehumanization is doing its unfortunate magic. Alienization is presto. Complete.
The word “alienation” comes to mind, which is different than the state of being alien. It means making someone who might be really no different than you … into some “thing.”
The history of the rise of propaganda positioned against the Japanese Americans in the US was an effective tactic to alienate other people, not unlike similar tactics we know throughout history and the world.
Visited the Japanese American Museum in Portland today, and got a vocabulary lesson thru the various historical artifacts and writings there about a v recent past here in the US.
“New (hu)man must have the courage to be new.” —Apollinaire designintech.report/wp-content/u...
But human opinion, even when guided/controlled by media technologies still requires many interactions for behavior changes to stick.
The RL loop for humanity can still get disrupted by humans outside of the loop. I choose to believe this.
The way? Let’s just say it took a while to get to where “modern” design brought us today. A good marination takes a good deal of time.
I think we’d like to think that the marinating process can be accelerated with GPUs.
The Bauhaus era was about reconciling new industry-grade technologies and their specific habits of form-making.
The goal? To find a way to meld humanistic thinking with the new mechanistic outputs.
Because writing wrong can be a path to not being “right.”
But even better. Being new.
To remain yourself, it is important to write by yourself.
At least if you care to be. Yourself.
And not just. Others.
The LLM can write better than you, by a standard which others are measured.
But you write better than the LLM, by a standard which you measure yourself.
This situation can’t be faked, however. And fortunately it doesn’t get called to bear more than a few times during one’s run at a challenging goal.
Constraint-heavy creativity lives in the need-to-figure-out-or-consequences-are-dire. I think in LLM terms this might be when you are ALL CAPS-ING yourself to ensure success in the face of extermination-style concerns.
It’s a high-risk space to live in that doesn’t have a goal. That is what makes it very uncomfortable for every reason.
Constraint-zero creativity lives in the space of likely being wrong if it is coming at a time where you are slightly desperate. It’s when you don’t care about anything else and only care about the work.
It is when you have nothing at stake or everything at stake when you are the most creative. It’s a different kind of creativity on either end.
Whether we value that difference or not will depend on how critical thinking evolves in the mediascape. And also whether or not you appreciate the true randomness implicit to a life that is lived IRL.
The chaos of that process still beats the pseudo-stochasticism of the GenAI approach.
How do we define the value of creative effort during a time when “effortless creative” is becoming the norm? I think we need to appreciate the slow marination of ideas that become subject to many random forces.
Having a place to think without subjecting oneself to extreme noise is a positive direction for me.
