Apparently each generation of utility regulators and energy policy analysts need to reinvent "performance based ratemaking"
Apparently each generation of utility regulators and energy policy analysts need to reinvent "performance based ratemaking"
You know what isnβt good for grid reliability?
βJust keep that one plant running a little longer.β
The DOE is using emergency powers like duct tape on a cracked pipe. Here I explain why thatβs bad policy.
www.rstreet.org/commentary/l...
New York AGβs efforts to clarify enforcement of its price gouging laws is good in principle, and engaging with economics is a good step. Only, they donβt really take economics seriously, so much more work is needed.
truthonthemarket.com/2025/04/22/n...
Planet Money explored trading on Trump tweets in the earlier administration. Unsurprisingly, his tweets were an unreliable signal. www.npr.org/2019/10/08/7...
Electricity production costs can vary dramatically within a day, and consumers end up paying for the really expensive powerβjust not in a way thatβs visible or controllable by consumers. We can do better.
www.rstreet.org/commentary/l...
An alternate real solution is driving up the price of oil by making hydrocarbons more valuable in non-combustion uses.
The complaint itself is available from the FERC eLibrary elibrary.ferc.gov/eLibrary/fil...
That explanation explains the testimony I wrote in support of the complaint (included in the filing as Attachment C). If you prefer the economics and industry jargon laden version of the testimony, it's at this link. www.rstreet.org/outreach/mic...
In December @rstreet.bsky.social, other consumer advocates, & industrial consumers filed a complaint at FERC seeking reforms in transmission planning (primarily aimed at the regulatory gap that grants monopolies easy access to rate hikes). Here's an explanation. www.rstreet.org/commentary/l...
Heads up, the Biden-Harris White House websites are now archived! If you have an old link that gives an error, you can delete the www . whitehouse in the link (be sure to remove the www) and replace with bidenwhitehouse.archives.gov/ [rest of your link]
bidenwhitehouse.archives.gov/ostp/news-up...
Granted, the emission free technology is pretty amazing, and I like it. It just isnβt free.
No cost to whom?
It seems an oversight to express concern about the potential abuse of market power in ISOs without at least briefly mentioning ISO market monitoring and market power mitigation measures. energyathaas.wordpress.com/2025/01/21/c...
Texas Republicans did not deregulate, they reformed the regulatory system for the grid covering a large part of the state. Few informed analysts link the reforms to the February 2021 energy system failures. Our βDigital Warriorβ is spreading disinformation.
Iβm pretty sure there are superior alternatives to either of these extremes.
Is anyone surprised that oil and gas executives are not supporting candidates dedicated to ending the oil and gas industry?
Whales are the new snail darters?
From what I can tell the California Energy Commission is declaring progress on the time honored logic of βPost hoc, ergo propter hoc.β www.energy.ca.gov/news/2024-12...
Top minds are working on it.
βHow a simple math error sparked a panic about black plastic kitchen utensilsβ: Does it matter when an estimate is off by a factor of 10?
statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu/2024/12/13/h...
Madison, WI
Bloomington, IN
Athens, GA
Iβm not expert enough to say who was wrong about pandemic strategy but it was obvious that Fauci was dishonest in his public statements. Donβt know if lying is the kind of βwrongβ that gets grace by the essayistβs standards.
Odd an essay declaring "In that context, some grace is warranted for those whose predictions turned out to be wrong" expresses little grace toward Bhattacharya or his ideas on how to respond to the pandemic. Maybe the essayist reserves grace only for officially blessed wrong predictions?
It probably wasnβt the reportersβ intentions, but this article strike me as expressing begrudging admiration for the careful, long run legal strategies that led to overturning the Chevron doctrine. wapo.st/4g2Stv3
Yes, cost-causation is established regulatory principle. This is the way. However, other than the large power consumption at a site I donβt think they require much in the way of special attention.
Counterpoint: The Federal Power Act prohibits discriminatory practices
for good reason. A new data center or steel mill or manufacturing plant should get access to power under the same rules.
The βmost free market systemβ is primarily organized around IRS tax treatment of employer health insurance benefits that ties insurance to jobs + govt mandates and penalties?
But I agree with you in that I would not shop at such a bookstore. Twitter just doesnβt feel like that, to me it feels like a place where a community of energy policy people mix it up plus a few economists and others I know and some random noise which is occasionally interesting.