Liberalism Enjoyer 🗽🌐🏗️🔰

I think its fine to attack people who are being counterproductive, even if they describe themselves as antifascist. I want _effective_ antifacsism, and frankly that's just not sexy for the black bloc fetishist and therefore they aren't interested

I don't think you have a good idea of what the situation is on the ground and who's doing what. As usual, antifa aren't really doing anything effective here

Never forget: Pam Bondi and Kash said there was nothing in the Epstein files back in March

Sure, I don't really care how you want to describe him. He's just closer to the average person actually showing up and doing something effective than the leftist larpers like yourself

the "rest of the country" is nothing like the leftist echochamber you've constructed for yourself, sorry

the people doing the real work here in MN are average people who probably disagree with you on most political points

in context it's okay to attack them online, yes. which is what was being discussed. as you can see by the context that was provided to you

Following ICE has the same constitutional protections as dispatching people to follow ICE, unless you are telling people to commit crimes when you dispatch them.

Notably the feds are not murdering dispatchers, they're murdering people who are following them around, because they are murdering people in spasms of thuggish violence rather than as part of a calculated strategy of death squads or whatever you imagine it to be.

This has to be a MAGA parody account

I answered yesterday

I guess the good news is radical communists are totally in effective at gaining or wielding said power in this country. Partially a historical inoculation and partly because conditions are nowhere near as bad as they were in Russia 1917

I actually think people should take reasonable measures to protect themselves here, opsec-wise. But we shouldnt't get so lost down the rabbit hole that documenting unhelpful instigators(something the admin is hoping pop up) is jumbled up with the more effective forms of protest we've seen

Did you read the rest of this? Did you ask about what context differs between 1910s Russia and modern American cities?

Maga thanks you for your service carrying these kinds of takes along

I thought about that for about 2 seconds and realized that no, that was not in fact the case and not at all how that played out. Also, context matters of these events

Declining to film or document what's happening isn't bad optics, it's no optics, and basically a silent pre-compliance with the powers that you're protesting. Visible, large movements work, not endless opsec charades

If you're talking about the super lefties, they're a tiny minority of these protests

I encourage you to read further

No, they don't know that. Just to cut to the case on that question.

Yeah no. Don’t set random fires in my neighborhood. People live here actually

🚨U.S. veteran GOES ABSOLUTELY NUCLEAR ON ICE:

"I've bled for this country, I've fought for this country—they're disgracing this f*cking country and what it f*cking means! They hide behind their f*cking masks like f*cking pussies! Get them out of here!" WE'RE LIVE NOW ⬇️

Why is Trump committing serial murder in the Caribbean? So he can post images of boats being blown and get likes and retweets from fascist influencers. He's killing people because he thinks it'll make good posts - it's "based."

Why did DHS conduct this insane apartment raid in Chicago, kicking down doors in the middle of the night and zip-tying US citizens in vans?

To give them footage for this action-movie montage where Latinos are led out into the street by heavily armed thugs, replete with slow-motion pyrotechnics.

absolutely bizarre to see a violent, rogue american regime, which is threatening military attacks on a bunch of major trading partners and close allies, and openly fantasizing about hitler-style wars of territorial conquest, covered in the tone of horse-race political commentary

Yarvin’s folly is a species of this broader malady

The wild thing about Trump II is that they're astonishingly racist in their civilizational narratives, but then they put France and Britain in the nuclear risk category usually reserved for Pakistan.

It clarifies things if you realize that "destructive moral ideas" here means non-white immigration.

Yes!! This is not a recent revelation. No one thought he was creeping on teenagers but suddenly developed moral scruples about crossing legally actionable lines. The exact same suspicions that exist today that existed then (and still haven’t been confirmed).

👇👇👇👇