's Avatar

@enchantedgladez

28
Followers
227
Following
130
Posts
03.10.2025
Joined
Posts Following

Latest posts by @enchantedgladez

pretty much - the context completely changes the read of the screenshot so omitting it seems super misleading

11.01.2026 16:54 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0

weird take imo

11.01.2026 16:52 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
Post image

It was an Iranian who made the comparison with Harry Potter - should JK have replied dismissing them instead?

11.01.2026 16:52 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
Post image

It was an Iranian who made the comparison - should she not have replied?

11.01.2026 16:50 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0
Post image

It was an Iranian who brought in Harry Potter - should she not have replied?

11.01.2026 16:49 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0
Post image
07.10.2025 18:41 👍 71 🔁 12 💬 0 📌 0

idk if it needed to be permanent but taking action seems fair

07.10.2025 00:08 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

bsky.app/profile/segy...

07.10.2025 00:05 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0

ban seems legit I meant

07.10.2025 00:04 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

so yeah, seems pretty fair

06.10.2025 17:37 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0

OK, the context has now been surfaced.. not good

06.10.2025 17:36 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 2 📌 0

I'm talking about her interactions on this site...

06.10.2025 17:36 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

“Read the room” has long been my least favorite internettism because it implies failure to conform is embarrassing. “Posting through it” is getting high on the list for the same reason.

06.10.2025 13:02 👍 104 🔁 7 💬 9 📌 4

feels like this would warrant a temporary suspension and/or warning with post takedown… but a permaban? seems a bit much imo

06.10.2025 14:41 👍 49 🔁 4 💬 6 📌 1

I flicked through the posts on the pds with that tool that someone posted and didn't see much to justify suspension, so yea, I guess I agree if there isn't context I've missed

06.10.2025 11:22 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0

Mama, is that you?

06.10.2025 10:15 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

Was just reading a thread of the replies and getting frustrated but my main doesn't really get into deep debates on contentious stuff

06.10.2025 10:15 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0

yeah I didn't say twitter was the better website

05.10.2025 21:40 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

Yeah, maybe some users' interpretation of the Community Guidelines changed following some announcement - although tbh I suspect people may have only read them with the motivation of the JS issue? (I certainly hadn't read them til now)

05.10.2025 20:17 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 2 📌 0

The Louvre of Bluesky is Libs of TikTok for leftists and it's embarrassing that anything they say has a large footprint here

05.10.2025 19:53 👍 612 🔁 71 💬 263 📌 195

ok - with "engaging" I was talking about me (and various other TPOTty accounts I've seen get excited about this vibeshift) so that's why I was confused

05.10.2025 20:08 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

Again I don't think that's the behaviour she was mocking - imo pancakes/waffles goes way beyond the JS thing

05.10.2025 20:07 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 3 📌 0

well it's because I'm seeing a bunch of claims to the contrary lol

05.10.2025 20:05 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0

have I mocked anyone?

05.10.2025 20:02 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 2 📌 0

Hey I'm not saying it's perfect - bring on the decentralised moderation!

05.10.2025 20:01 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 1

(thanks for seeking me out to answer anyway!)

05.10.2025 20:00 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

am i shadowbanned? :'(

05.10.2025 19:57 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0

weird? it's here? bsky.app/profile/ench...

05.10.2025 19:55 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0

Responses to this thread are pretending my argument is "let in the racists and be nice to them". *I don't want that.* Keep them out!

I want normies to come here and find it fun. There are 1m daily users here out of 8bn people. Saying "I want more people here" doesn't mean "let racists in" ffs.

01.09.2025 13:53 👍 67 🔁 1 💬 0 📌 2

Nice dunk

05.10.2025 19:51 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0