I am not a conspiracy nut!
I am not a conspiracy nut!
Yes, you're acting as if I was lobbying for the notion instead of merely exploring its viability!
When did I ever mention humiliation?
You took that proposal out of context!
I still want to make a vintage fake abdl fashion magazine
>Its also not really possible to compromise
It is NECESSARY to compromise. There is no version of the likely future where half the people on this debate just vanish. You are going to have to find a way to live with your interlocutors.
A Summary of the Transgender debate, using edited png images.
The Transgender Debate, Summarised.
#Truth #Politics #Trans #Transgender #Debate
heres the thing though. people includes synths. you have to be so careful designing the robots ai so it doesnt accidentally become a person and now you own slaves
Until we develop a weapon to surpass nuclear bombs.
Interceptors are becoming more sophisticated. Is it truly so inconceivable to you that in ten years, the USA might be able to shoot down all of North Korea's nuclear warheads, even if it launched them simultaneously?
Every knee must bend.
It is working, so far.
Ships are starting to cross the strait again. You actually can defeat your enemies by embodying the warrior ethos. Mars favours His champions.
Don't be a killjoy, let your inner 12-year-old boy have some fun.
D.W Griffith insisted it wasn't. Ultimately, the audience must interpret each work of art through the audience's own lenses and perspectives
(they also went after Catholics, Republicans, Quakers, freedmen, and Jews)
(They killed quite a few people, but mostly just intimidated them)
Opposition to Northern/Federal corruption and interference in the affairs of Southern States.
(also, to be fair, the vested socioeconomic interests of the plantation owners)
(and also revenge for the war, which they exercised by brutally mistreating innocents)
(they were wankers, just not racist)
No. Racism exists within human brainiums, it is a conceptual phenomenon, and if no humans yet concieved of it, it was not there.
In some sense, yes. The world is not independent of our observation of it.
I am aligned with Truth. Where Truth is, so am I.
They couldn't protect their supreme leader, you think they can protect every scout?
Look at the last picture, that is literally not the same person. His eyes are closer together, so far as I'm aware there's no surgery that can do this, you'd need a different skull.
No. The sky was not blue before eyes capable of seeing blue evolved.
>They could put people on the north coast of the strait
Iranian binocular scouts when the B2s arrive:
Nobody called it racist until Trotsky.
The iranians can also see that real-time tracker.
The Greek ship that got through did it by disabling its transponder.
Segregation? No. Trotsky Was Born in the 1870s, I think the segregation laws don't predate him.
The Klan? Sort of, the absolute earliest iteration of it predates him by a few years, but that was before it adopted many of the practices and symbols it is today associated with.
bsky.app/profile/thec...
We are on day 9 of the war, day 8 of the shutdown. I think your panic might be premature.
If you're going to lose composure at every little action the enemy takes, you might as well surrender now. The future belongs to the bold.
Silence, Negative Nancy!
Your doomsaying has no power here.
Hellenic SailorChad moggs Persian PirateCels!
You were saying?
Interesting use of sarcasm. Shall we check in on Saddam Hussein, and see how he feels about it? Oh, wait, we can't. Because he's out of the picture.
The goal here is to incapacitate Iran. In the worst-case scenario, ruining their infrastructure and plunging them into decades-long poverty does that.