ashwiniag

There are graphic novel versions of Sapiens now. 🤭

And half of them think sarcasm counts as a personality. 😌

new day new art

Hunter-gatherer logic is a lazy excuse for modern inequality. 🤷‍♀️

#Anthropology #SystemicInequality

We ended with joke...Holi hai. Brain ko thoda holiday dete hain. lol

My 2cents, stay curious & build empathy.

Although the question remains, is it you alone who is fair and is the system fair for everyone? 🤔

But systems can change faster than mindsets. Until the mindset shifts the imbalance just finds quieter, more invisible ways to persist across all aspects of life.

Empathy is the crucial catalyst to commence that change at an individual level, first. Then comes Acknowledgment of privilege. 🤷‍♀️

We often hear "things are getting better" & they are. But the fight is much harder & isolating than it seem to appear.

For lot of us, the struggle against these systems is very real, very exhausting, and very invisible!

He then said “People who have seen fairness should advocate for those who haven’t” I agree. But advocacy begins with understanding the depth of the imbalance, not just acknowledging it in passing.

Advocacy includes acting and actively standing up for injustice. Sympathy > Empathy > Action 🤷‍♀️

Empathy leads you to asks the questions sympathy avoids. "What freedoms did I never even have to think about, that others have to fight for every day?"

This is what shifts the lens from "I feel bad for you" to "I see the weight you're carrying and I'm questioning why the scale is tipped."
🤷‍♀️

Sympathy keeps a distance, it's an observation from the shore. Empathy is getting in the water.

Sympathy acknowledges the struggle but stops there. It stunts the impulse to question the system because you feel you've already "done your part" by feeling bad. 🤷‍♀️

I realised we were stuck because counter points were coming from a place of sympathy "I appreciate what women do, the family would crumble without them." "Yeah, society puts a lot of pressure on you folks."

I feel we’re often trading sympathy when we should be practicing "empathy". Here is why

One person's experience isn't a universal reality. If one has grown up in fair environments that’s a privilege. And one should be aware of it.

Then came the pivot the "Trap of the Good Household." "This doesn't happen in my house" he said.

If one grow up seeing fairness, it’s natural to assume the system is fixed. But exceptions don’t erase patterns. That’s where perspective can become limited... 🤷‍♀️

When men "held the outside" they gained mobility financial access &legal identity

When women "held the inside" they lost inheritance, sexual right, autonomy, safety &their very identity

That delta is structural & its huge.

We failed to see that both sides are interdependent not independent. 🤷‍♀️

My friend pointed to "societal pressure" on both sides. We must understand "Pressure with resources & power is different from Pressure without it." 🤷‍♀️

Why there exists a pressure in the first place?! 🤷‍♀️

#SexistSocialisation

Further, we see women raised to prioritise everyone else, while men are rarely raised to actively protect her' time, individuality, friendships like themselves.

Her friendships often fails cuz chores, emotional labor, & expectations pile up & nobody redistributes that weight. It is never "natural"

Authorities got inherited through systems, religion, property laws, economic dependence, social conditioning, centuries of normalising and glorifying women’s sacrifice.

"Power exists when one group is socialised to obey and the other to rule." 🤷‍♀️

#SexistSocialisation

When we challenge that power, it’s easy to say "nobody gave it to them." But we have to ask: How did this power dynamics came to existence?

The clash began here "My dad never denied my mom her friends. The people I know don't deny their wives anything"

But the problem isn’t whether a man allows | denies his wife a choice. The problem is the unchallenged assumption that he holds the authority to grant that permission in the first place.

It started with a simple observation about female's friendships falling apart, but it led us to a much deeper systemic rift.

🧵 Last night I had a long discussion about gender, power, and systems with a friend. And somewhere in that conversation I realised something important about "how we talk and fail to talk" about inequality.

#GenderEquality #MindsetShift #SystemsThinking #SexistSocialisation #Privilege #MenRights

Every tech CEO right now: "We need to move fast and break things"
The thing they're breaking: their own terms of service
The thing they're moving fast toward: a government contract

If a stakeholder doesn't see the difference between maintenance and evolution, they aren't ready for elite talent. Move on.

#Startups

Don't confuse the bucket for the solution. Manual "support" is a recurring cost; Engineering is a permanent asset!

I don't optimise for uptime by working harder; I optimise for uptime by making the system smarter. If you want a handyman, hire a junior. If you want a foundation, hire an engineer

Hiring an architect to do support is like buying a Ferrari to sit in traffic.

If your day-to-day is manual toil, you aren't building a backbone; you're just patching cracks. You close the fire today so you can build the sprinkler system tomorrow.

🔻 Rebuttal 4: The "Support" vs. "Engineering" Trap

"We just need someone to handle the infra support & keep the lights on for now."

If your Founding role is just support, your architecture is already failing. Senior engineers don't support chaos; they automate it out of existence

#RebuttalSeries

Stop making excuses and start building systems. Put the operational rails in place to remove friction before you interview.

If you want to hire the backbone of your company, you need to show you have the backbone and caliber to support them.

By failing to do due diligence on your own tools, you aren't just "being cautious" you’re low-balling and undermining elite talent.

Elite engineers don't wait around; they move to founders who have already automated the friction away.

#Startups

If your legal and HR infrastructure can’t handle a standard Grant Notice or a Side Letter, your technical infra probably won't handle a production load. Administrative friction is a leading indicator of technical debt.

#Startups

🔻 Rebuttal 3: HR tools don't support it excuses

"Our payroll tools don't support legally binding equity or full-time commitments for international contractors."

This is an operational red flag. It shows a fundamental lack of understanding of how global startups actually scale.

#RebuttalSeries