Sir, I'm unsure if you have seen the historical drama, "Deadwood," but one of the main characters expresses an eerily similar sentiment.
Al: "Sometimes I wish we could just hit 'em over the head, rob 'em, and throw their bodies in the creek."
Cy: "But that would be wrong."
[fred-thompson-red-october-dot-gif]
Posted the other day about attending a wounded warrior welcome home at the Pentagon in 2012.
Being present at these ceremonies is important, not just for the families, but because they change your perspective of the cost of war.
Sorry I'm not more open-minded about LLMs, it's just some fucking maniacs shoveled out a bunch of useless bloatware featuring that technology, did not give me any chance to opt out, reorganized the entire economy around it, zeroed out gains made by green energy, and made it impossible to buy RAM
"there is no cure for long Covid"
Also no supports while you recover - financial, physical, mental health
Great. So your level of defending your purchase and use of ChatGPT despite the myriad of ethical concerns is...what?
"I'm not doing that, so I don't care if the money goes toward a company that kills kids and admittedly has an unsafe product?"
Because that was my concern. Your ball, bud.
Was that before or after you said, "And I'd do it again, because I'm not using it for teen suicide or drug overdoses?" Or does this civility lesson only apply one way?
And you seemed to have realized that your justification is so pathetic that you now need to resort to childish insults. Neat.
But that's okay, I know its hard to have actual standards.
No, your $, and now public support, goes toward the company engaging in it with the specific product that you are using.
All because <checks notes> you wanted to make "open enrollment easier."
We don't need to be bastions of virtue, but come the fuck on.
And yet you suggested your company use a product that has how many lawsuits for teen suicides and drug overdoses?
I know we are all excited to have more automation and less time doing mundane, administrative tasks, but maybe, JUST MAYBE, we should have some ethical standards and principles.
Personally, I think tools that convince teens to commit suicide might be problematic and we could aim a little higher.
Or, hear me out, some of us don't want to use products that are that repeatedly shown to cause harm to vulnerable communities and from companies that admit that the longer you use said products, the more the safety guardrails are likely to fail.
UMMMM
Dropping this account. You only get to promote someone with nazi ties once, and you wasted that on a fucking Info Wars dweeb.
Do better.
I’m again asking that to stop hiding the names of the authors of this drivel.
I know we don’t want to drive engagement to the article, but the authors should be named and shamed for engaging in such journalistic malpractice that actively misleads its audience. Hold these people accountable.
world-altering decisions are being made by a cabal of gambling addicts hell bent on self enrichment no matter the cost to humanity, we should look into that.
I'm late Gen X and all I'm saying is Millennials got fucked harder than anyone else. They were raised on post 9/11 American media and government and it's just been an endless stream of shit. And I'm not even talking about the 09 collapse. The wars, watching guns shred schools, social media insanity
It would be nice if any of the hosts, guest, hosts, or production side at CNN had some fucking ethics and standards and refused to work with Baghdad Bob.
But that would require people to forfeit time on TV so…
This week's cover @thelancet.com
Listen you can do that shit on X, but this is not 'Nam, there are rules here sort of/not really/shut up.
Why, in the WORLD, are we citing Owen “InfoWars” Shroyer?
Cmon guys…
All I’m going to say is WTF diabetes
"Symbolic purpose"
So...illegal. Got it.
Seems like you might want to lead with that.
"The president had DOJ illegally cover up documents about allegations he sexually assaulted a child after Congress specifically passed a law requiring they be disclosed" is, in and of itself, enough to merit rapid removal from office regardless of how true or credible the underlying allegation is.
Also, automatically ineligible for entry because of the previous criminal conviction, so it would be fun to see who gave permission.
This quote works a lot better if you don't think about how much he kisses the feet of Silicon Valley "leaders" whenever they present their latest uniquely terrible idea or intensely anti-worker or anti-consumer practice.
The collapse of American elites is precisely why this administration has been able to do as much as it has. The first line of defense is institutional friction and noncompliance, but the institutions (w/some exceptions Congress, the courts, industry, the media) have largely abandoned the fight.
FLAG: Trump-related files are missing from DOJ's Epstein release.
There's at least one witness for whom three 2019 FBI interviews are missing.
That woman is the same person who, in a 2025 FBI presentation, is identified to have accused Trump of a sexual assault when she was between 13 and 15.
