Sweet Kratos at NYC ACC on kill command- please- ME, NY, NJ, CT we need a foster to save him! Pls repost!!
15.04.2025 20:18
👍 19
🔁 13
💬 0
📌 1
Sweet Kratos at NYC ACC on kill command- please- ME, NY, NJ, CT we need a foster to save him! Pls repost!!
Not an easy one today. I’m sure not everybody will agree with our approach on this one.
I think it’s a very important rescue and piece of work though…
www.youtube.com/watch?v=DRei...
You really need to reassess your plans for visiting us here in the U.S. Don’t put your wonderful work in jeopardy. Many countries are advising their citizens to not visit at this time.
Never. Forget. Never. Forgive. ✨
Crazy that four dems voted for the save act...
Voter suppression.
If your federal payroll provider is DFAS, the Interior Business Center, or the National Finance Center your union dues are no longer being deducted from your paycheck. ⤵️
www.govexec.com/workforce/20...
Case 8:25-cv-00951-PX Document 59 Filed 04/11/25 Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND (Greenbelt Division) KILMAR ARMANDO ABREGO GARCIA et al., Plaintiffs, Civil No.: 8:25-cv-00951-PX DEFENDANTS' RESPONSE TO AMENDED PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION ORDER v. KRISTI NOEM, Secretary of Homeland Security, et al., Defendants. RESPONSE TO AMENDED PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION ORDER Defendants are unable to provide the information requested by the Court on the impracticable deadline set by the Court hours after the Supreme Court issued its order. The Supreme Court's order directs the Court to "clarify its directive, with due regard for the deference owed to the Executive Branch in the conduct of foreign affairs." Abrego Garcia v. Noem, 25A949, 604 U. S. — . (2025), Op. at 2. The Court has not yet clarified what it means to "facilitate" or "effectuate" the return as it relates to this case, as Plaintiff is in the custody of a foreign sovereign. Defendants request— and require-the opportunity to brief that issue prior to being subject to any compliance deadlines. Needless to say, Defendants were under no obligation to take action under the court's order while it was administratively stayed by the Chief Justice of the United States. In light of the insufficient amount of time afforded to review the Supreme Court's Order following the dissolution of the administrative stay
in this case, Defendants are not in a position where they "can" share any information requested by the Court. That is the reality. Defendants received the order late in the evening last night. They are reviewing the order and actively evaluating next steps. It is unreasonable and impracticable for Defendants to reveal potential steps before those steps are reviewed, agreed upon, and vetted. Foreign affairs cannot operate on judicial timelines, in part because it involves sensitive country-specific considerations wholly inappropriate for judicial review. Respectfully Submitted, Yaakov M. Roth Acting Assistant Attorney General Civil Division Drew C. Ensign Jeputy Assistant Attorney General Office of Immigration Litigation 950 Pennsylvania Avenue Washington, DC 20530 Phone: (202) 514-2000 Email: drew.c.ensign@usdoj.gov Ernesto Molina Deputy Director Office of Immigration Litigation Counsel for Defendants Tarra DeShields (Bar No. 07749) Assistant United States Attorney U.S. Attorney's Office, District of MD
WOW: “Defendants are not in a position where they "can" share any information requested by the Court. That is the reality.”
DOJ refuses to say more, doesn’t even say whether they are refusing to appear at 1 pm hearing
Or, hear me out on this one, it's because the richest people in the country pay a lower average tax rate than our middle 50% of the country.
More pain, no gain
Whatever happened to emails?
The key line is, "in the custody of a foreign sovereign."
The Administration is—predictably—treating SCOTUS as having upheld its legal theory that the moment it sells a body to Nayib Bukele, it can't retrieve it because he has _permanent_ custody of it.
And that's how the slave trade works, folks.
BREAKING: As expected, and consistent with all the PROOF reporting from the past week, the Trump administration has now _refused to follow court orders_ in the Abrego Garcia case.
Major media misinformed the public by telling them that the Supreme Court ruling in the case was a win for rule of law.
They don’t care.
Asinine. This whole thing. All his blathering about a beautiful thing. We will not experience any such beauty from this. He has given us NO PROTECTIONS from any of this. It is purely using the power of our country that we (the commoners) pay taxes to, for his own bank account.
Donald Trump continues to act more like a totalitarian dictator than the President of the United States.
Let’s make sure they all hear about it…👇
You know what to do. 😎✨
THREAD: Under a new law, thousands of prisoners in Louisiana have been cut off from ever getting a chance at parole.
Why?
Because an algorithm said so. 1/
Jasmine Crockett spitting that hot fire!
“Kiss my ass”
“Why is this bad?”. Wow.
Call & Email
Your Senators
Tell them to
Vote NO on the
SAVE Act!
The House GOP voted yes on it JUST NOW, THURSDAY
APRIL 10th
What is the
SAVE Act?
www.axios.com/2025/02/11/s...
Married Women Could Be Stopped From Voting Under SAVE Act - Newsweek
www.newsweek.com/married-wome...
5calls.org
Biggest insider trading market manipulation scheme in history.
They aren't even bothering to hide it.
There’s NO ONE to enforce it.
Should begin in the White House with spouses and children, and hildren of immigrants.
