Yes, double indemnity is where you cannot be arrested unless youβre committing two crimes simultaneously
Yes, double indemnity is where you cannot be arrested unless youβre committing two crimes simultaneously
First crime is free tho
Everyone involved in breaking that marineβs arm should face charges. Every one of them should lose their job.
Letting Fetterman score clean dunks like this is a threat to national security
Tasmanian Nativehen is a silly name, like calling it a βcommon Averagebird.β But the eyes are unlike anything Iβve seen
Tasmanian Nativehen running across some grass. It has a strikingly red eye and yellow beak
Even the common birds are wild here
Currently traveling in Tasmania and really enjoying the unfamiliar birds and animals. Itβs like earth got a DLC where the designers really just had fun with it
Who knew βis this shit working?β was a billion dollar business
EDM futures at an all time high?
same language as on the urinal plaques in the DOD bathrooms
This is a truly insidious decision on Metaβs part. Lots to hate about that company, but engineering this kind of βvampire rulesβ data collection (interact with the AI and we record every input) workaround, where the UX doesnβt indicate youβre being spied on after opting out is evil
Itβs in the article, but itβs perhaps understated. Imagine that every time you use a voice assistant, every camera on your phone began recording and that video was transmitted for annotation
Compliance issues are real, but thereβs no way users understand that voice interaction triggers the cameras
When the arsonist is sad that it was not he who got to start the fire.
Presumably the full quote is, βIt's going to uncork a significant can of worms and chaos and destruction in Iran now /from which I cannot currently profit. So thatβs a bummer./β
aka βseaselsβ
Classic roadkill cut-offs non-denial
The guy who brings a whole gaming rig into the Dunkinβ Donuts?
I think we can learn what works and what doesnβt from any candidate, even the ones I wouldnβt support, but the man has all the ingredients of a Fetterman. The confidence he wouldnβt be one seems out of step with your normally very thoughtful takes
Had an Econ professor whose refrain of βover what period of time?β has never left my mind. Whether itβs business, politics, war, or just being alive, the time horizon for evaluating outcomes only seems to trend toward instantaneous.
If we donβt call it βShah IIβ and instead call it a reboot, the SEO optimization will take care of that pesky history.
So we are going to get a Southland Tales episode?
It was clearly a hassle, but I did see this play out yesterday at PHL
He saw the video of Patel and got jealous
Good things are still possible, it seems
I laughed out loud at least once per episode. I love a lot of shows for which that canβt be said. Itβs worth your time and seems like itβll reward repeated viewings
Done. ππ
Please make more.
2025: we have to get rid of large numbers of government employees because the standards were lowered for them
2026: we're lowering the standard for government employees
What the fuck
And in PA, we do show ID to vote. The first time you vote at your polling place, you bring ID. Youβre then not asked for it again, because we know the voter roll is correct for you. Changing that offers no additional assurance. It only plays into a disenfranchisement campaign. Fetterman is an idiot.
Define the scenario. If you are worried about something, articulate it. Idle speculation about a vague threat serves no purpose but misinformation.