Michael Lakeman's Avatar

Michael Lakeman

@suitedscience

he/him, tangata tiriti Marine biologist...freelance I'm just here for the multisolving, cider, Ms, seaweed, techno, and seahawks

216
Followers
551
Following
452
Posts
12.10.2023
Joined
Posts Following

Latest posts by Michael Lakeman @suitedscience

Preview
Stop calling the Greens radical As opposed to the flatly ideological Coalition partners, they have demonstrated themselves as the most evidence-based and pragmatic party

πŸƒπŸŒΉπŸŒΏ NZGreens have demonstrated they are the most evidence-based & pragmatic NZ political party with fully-costed budgets, & fiscal strategies that are meticulously researched & proofed #nzpol open.substack.com/pub/weareund...?

06.03.2026 22:18 πŸ‘ 25 πŸ” 8 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 1

I've had a front row seat to this campaign in Aotearoa, and I can tell you that your hunch about it wrong, here at least. It's simply parents who are scarred or scared, and want to protect children. It's no more complicated than that.

05.03.2026 22:17 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

I find it extremely offensive that my and my family's pain, bravery and efforts to fix such a dangerous situation can be so easily dismissed by childless keyboard warriors as some kind of nefarious scheme to get at other people's privacy.

What, I'm either an agent of evil or a useful idiot? F that

05.03.2026 21:41 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Its too late for us. It's for all the other poor kids and parents who dont know what's about to hit them

05.03.2026 18:32 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

"...and possibly also a ban on that guy Andrew on Blue Sky".

I mean, they didn't actually say that either, but it could thoetically be a possible outcome. Better focus on this one particular minor hinted at possible outcome then, instead of a substantive engagement with the actual content.

05.03.2026 09:23 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

Who is suggesting banning VPNs? The Select Committe report released today didn't.

05.03.2026 09:18 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

As for our family, having two currently teenage daughters, we are staunch supporters of a ban. Life-altering harm directly caused by social media, x2, gives you a different perspective.

05.03.2026 08:52 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

selectcommittees.parliament.nz/v/6/e05a9618...

05.03.2026 05:50 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

Oh god, read the report, and not just the axe-grinding hot takes on this stupid website.

They are recommending just that.

05.03.2026 05:41 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 2 πŸ“Œ 0

Sorry, where does it say banning?

05.03.2026 05:37 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Goddamn, this trite trivialisation pisses me off no end. Tell me how many teens in the early 1900s were sexually victimized or bullied to death by novels?

This isn't apples to oranges, its apples to anthrax

05.03.2026 05:29 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

Thanks. Yeah, if they did the rest of the stuff, especially instituting a regulator with real teeth, the age ban wouldn't be needed.

Spaghetti meets wall, now which strands will stick?

05.03.2026 03:43 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Good lord, can everyone calm down about VPNs. The SC report does not propose banning them, nor even explicitly recommend exploring the banning of them.

Yes we get it, you are smart and practical and virtuous. But you are losing your mind about a mischaractization of a very minor point.

05.03.2026 03:35 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Oh okay, thanks.

So, what do you find so unserious about the report? Too broad and thin? Did they miss the most obvious next step or recommendation?

05.03.2026 03:25 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

The VPN thing is a very minor point in the whole report, and despite how its being talked about here, noone suggested banning them

05.03.2026 03:15 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

I still remember how good the thin slices of raw turnip were after my granddad jumped a fence to nick it

04.03.2026 20:06 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

Whenever I have the pleasure to speak of her, I say "your future Prime Minister, Chloe Swarbrick"

03.03.2026 08:50 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

hopefully no one dies this time

03.03.2026 03:21 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

Wut do yoo mun?

01.03.2026 22:01 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Its great, eh? I've been feeling a little musically listless, but this album has inspired a whole new angle of digging and a whole new vibe I'm getting into since hearing it

28.02.2026 20:47 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Life is tough for evidence nerds these days. However, the complete disconnect between reality and the commentariat echo chamber is leading to a point where the evidence is simply not going to be able to be ignored.

28.02.2026 00:01 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Thanks for your generosity!

27.02.2026 21:50 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

"We shouldn't do a thing because its never been done" is the most circularly self-defeating argument you can make.

Right up there with "we shouldn't do a good thing because it's not perfect".

Can I get published in Nature now?

26.02.2026 22:57 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

Truly a death cult

26.02.2026 22:46 πŸ‘ 2 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0
Bernard pulling a fierce pΕ«kana in a split screen view of the subject interview

Bernard pulling a fierce pΕ«kana in a split screen view of the subject interview

Great interview.

I had connectivity issues and the shot here froze just as David starting talking about leveraging the billions in Superannuation. Clearly you have strong feelings about that topic!

26.02.2026 20:42 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

I'm very with you on this point. Too much focus on what species are present, conserved, or restored, and too little focus on maintaining or adapting ecological functions in the face of change.

26.02.2026 09:11 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0
"To be clear, the US faces no hard financing constraint. It does not need exports to pay its debts. It issues the currency in which those debts are written. But if it surrenders command of advanced manufacturing and crucial tech supply chains, it risks something else: slower productivity, weaker global leverage and domestic decay. That is not a payments crisis. It is a crisis of power."

full story at https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2026/feb/24/the-guardian-view-on-donald-trumps-tariffs-a-nostalgia-that-misreads-a-changed-world

"To be clear, the US faces no hard financing constraint. It does not need exports to pay its debts. It issues the currency in which those debts are written. But if it surrenders command of advanced manufacturing and crucial tech supply chains, it risks something else: slower productivity, weaker global leverage and domestic decay. That is not a payments crisis. It is a crisis of power." full story at https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2026/feb/24/the-guardian-view-on-donald-trumps-tariffs-a-nostalgia-that-misreads-a-changed-world

"To be clear, the US faces no hard financing constraint. It does not need exports to pay its debts. It issues the currency in which those debts are written.
.....
That is not a payments crisis.
....
It is a crisis of power."

www.theguardian.com/commentisfre...

26.02.2026 07:10 πŸ‘ 5 πŸ” 1 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Given his complete lack of imagination, i suspect he probably has friends from his time living in the USA, who happen to be visiting soon, and who happen to be called Chuck and Mary.

26.02.2026 03:50 πŸ‘ 3 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Yes! And then disestablish the Ministry, folding it into the new Ministry of Sustainable Development

25.02.2026 04:51 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

Delicious!

25.02.2026 04:38 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0