A fluffy white cat reclines in a modern white lounge chair, lying on its back with its front paws resting on its belly and back legs stretched out. The cat looks relaxed and content, as if lounging like a person in the sunlight near a window.
Good, I see the council is assembled. We have mews from the outer rim to discuss.
adopting a pet is always a good thing, but people who adopt retired police dogs are crazy to me, like you’re willingly adopting a 4-legged racist with teeth and bringing him into your home.
so they don't 'own' them. that's your original claim, or do you even remember?
that shit happens because the US government supports the zionist project for both fanatical religious reasons and geopolitical ones and knows that successful boycott and divestment would harm it. the 1% of her campaign funds that came from AIPAC didn't cause kamala harris to become a zionist.
how do they 'own' someone who they funded with less than 1% of her campaign funds?
literally every member of congress taking money from AIPAC is also taking money from defense contractors what the fuck are you even talking about?
they don't "own" democratic leadership. please tell me how much money AIPAC has given them vs how much money say the crytpo industry has given them or goldman-sachs. AIPAC gave less than 1% of kamala harris' fundraising, she supported genocide because she is a bloodthirsty genocidal liberal.
If an artist isn't able to visualise their ideas on paper (or on the screen) without the use of genAI, they are not an artist. I know some artists who aren't capable of visualising things in their head, yet they can still create stunning art. I know others who brainstorm their ideas and compositions with literal scribbles and stick figures, only to end up with a beautifully rendered piece. There is absolutely no excuse for a self-respecting artist to use genAI at any point during their process.
Someone over on Instagram saying that genAI is bad for art, but can still be used by artists who have trouble visualising their ideas.
I had to reply.
saying 'zionist money owns both parties in congress' is actually not the same thing as saying 'american christians have a bizarre religious fixation on israel and are supporting it for their own white supremacist reasons.' you're trying to pretend to be having a different argument
which is it? is it religious fanatics who have a specific reason for supporting israel or are they 'owned' by dirty zionist money? you seem to switch between those two ideas as though they're the same when they in fact aren't.
This is your brain on liberalism 🧠💙
Yes, Trump & the people he reps don't want the Epstein Files explored fully & consequences given (system ripped apart)
No, they weren't going to stop doing wars if the Epstein Files weren't made public
New York Post - GOP Sen. Tim Sheehy helps Capitol Police remove protestor - who allegedly injured 3 cops, appeared to break his own arm.
The only declarative statement here is that Tim Sheehy helped Capital Police
Then we get "who allegedly injured 3 cops". A thing there is literally no evidence of
Then we get "appeared to break his own arm". The cops pulling him broke the arm. We all saw the video
Even for NYP this is kinda wild
Perfect example of why everyone hates tech people. Perpetually aggrieved self righteous douchebags who cant even take the lightest ribbing of their unwarranted sense of self importance lol
charlize hurk right before it happens
how it feels to get dressed before work
does that one PAC 'own' congress? when compared to say donations from raytheon and lockheed-martin or the big banks or silicon valley companies?
"but samantha, what are you even talking about" it's nice when someone replies the thing I'm describing under the post describing it. "zionist lobby groups" have not purchased the political parties they give a tiny fraction of the money capitalists and their lobbies have.
no actually, nothing she said was antisemitic. because she doesn't imply there's a secret conspiracy of israelis who buy and control congress but instead points out the accurate reason the american political elite supports a genocidal colonial project in palestine.
she is such a fucking sellout, just completely parroting the party line at this point
okay but you said that in response to a discussion over whether america is a 'colony of israel' so it seems like you should have an opinion one way or the other
i love when they do that
right, your only point is wrong. because you're an idiot.
yes.
okay sorry you're just stupid. the saudis have way more money than israel but he's pulling defenses out of saudi arabia and the other gulf monarchies to defend israel because he believes he's going to summon god there.
there is nothing you can say that will convince me this man is a human with real interiority and that the AP didn't just interview a chatbot
he is a zionist, like many evangelical christians are. because they believe all the jews need to be in one place with the name 'israel' and with a specific set of borders for jesus to come back.
Don’t like that we’re just openly calling for a theocracy now
it was actually a trans narrative
yes.
no but the fact that he's surrounding himself with them and telling the army they are fighting a war to bring jesus back does
