John Haubenreich

Want to get rid of gerrymandering for good? (yes please!)

Want to make elections more competitive? (absolutely!)

Want to stop wasting your vote if you're in district/state that is dominated by a single party? (that's me!)

I am 100% a proportional representation convert; learn more below.

A new lawsuit alleges DHS illegally tracked and intimidated observers Observers watching federal immigration enforcement in Maine who were told by agents they were "domestic terrorists" and would be added to a "database" or "watchlist" are now part of a new federal clas...

Initial press coverage:

www.npr.org/2026/02/23/n...

www.politico.com/news/2026/02...

Really proud of my colleagues for filing this lawsuit. It's an incredibly important stand to take against government surveillance, targeting, and violation of our First Amendment rights. #democracy

Using a public AI model for those purposes seems quite inadvisable, but even using a locked-down model that does not store prompts or use them to train its model (including no human review) raises questions. Be careful out there, folks!

/end

The bottom line is that lawyers need to be VERY careful using AI, and think VERY, VERY hard about whether to input privileged or confidential information into an AI model.

/6

"But even if certain information that Heppner input into Claude was privileged, he waived the privilege by sharing that information with Claude and Anthropic, just as if he had shared it with any other third party."

/5

That being said, FN 3 should have lawyers thinking hard:

"At oral argument, Heppner's counsel suggested in passing that the AI Documents may be privileged because they "incorporated information that we had conveyed to Mr. Heppner over the course of our representation." Tr. at 3."

/4

Just as importantly, the client was using a public version of Claude which specifically noted that prompts and outputs would be used to train the model. The privacy policy played a big role in this decision.

/3

This is an issue of first impression according to Judge Rakoff and the lawyers involved, and there are some quirks that distinguish this from a lawyers' direct use of AI. Among them are that it was the *client* who made the queries and they were *not* made at the direction of counsel.

/2

#27 in United States v. HEPPNER (S.D.N.Y., 1:25-cr-00503) – CourtListener.com MEMORANDUM as to Bradley Heppner. At a pretrial conference in this matter held on February 10, 2026, the Court, after hearing the arguments of counsel, granted from the bench the Government's motion f...

🚨 For AI-using attorneys out there: Judge Rakoff (SDNY) put down an order Tuesday ruling that when a criminal defendant asked Claude legal strategy questions, those queries were NOT PRIVILEGED.

storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...

(but note the nuance in following posts)

/1

This GOOD BOY ran onto the course during the Women’s Cross-Country Skiing Team Sprint event, crossing the finish line and being automatically recorded by OMEGA’s photofinish camera 😆

a man in a suit and tie says will you remember me peacock ALT: a man in a suit and tie says will you remember me peacock

Glad I got to take my kiddo to The Groove one last time at the end of last year

All-time favorite 🤣

#superbowl

What's the most you ever lost on a coin toss? Anton Chigurh here for FanDuel,

Immigrant advocate describes physical encounters with ICE, efforts of accountability As much of the country has its focus on the protests and ICE interactions in Minnesota, similar responses have been taking place across the country for the last

"[W]e're taking the exact same law that local officers are already held accountable for [and]...applying them to federal agents through state law," our own Edgar Lin on states adopting a "Universal Constitutional Remedies Act" so residents can seek remedy if federal agents violate one's rights.

Can’t make a Tomlette without breaking some Greggs

“Philadelphia, September 17, 1787:

"Well, Dr. Franklin, what do we have?" "A republic, if you
can keep it."

With a judicial finger in the constitutional dike,

It is so ORDERED.”

“Observing human behavior confirms that for some among us, the perfidious lust for unbridled
power and the imposition of cruelty in its quest know no bounds and are bereft of human decency. And the rule of law be damned.”

READ. THIS. ORDER.

“Civics lesson to the government: Administrative warrants issued by the executive branch to itself do not pass probable cause muster. That is called the fox guarding the henhouse. The Constitution requires an independent judicial officer.”

Video of the first three days of trial is available below, and I urge anyone interested in learning more about the case or bringing a similar challenge in another state to reach out.

www.tncourts.gov/threejudgepa...

/end

We put on an incredibly strong case, and though we must return on 3/2 to finish the trial, we are already very optimistic about prevailing in this historic lawsuit. Among other causes of action, we are bringing a claim that presents an issue of first impression under the Tennessee Constitution.

/2

Fighting permanent felony disenfranchisement in Tennessee Protect Democracy, along with a team of attorneys from Arnold & Porter, are fighting to overturn Tennessee’s permanent felony disenfranchisement law.

Since 2022, I’ve been working to try to overturn Tennessee's felony disenfranchisement regime permanently denying the right to vote to thousands of Tennesseans. Last week, my co-counsel at Arnold & Porter and I traveled to Memphis for trial.

protectdemocracy.org/work/felony-...

/1

Pamela Moses v. Mark Goins, Tre Hargett, and Jonathan Skrmetti (Day 2 - January 21st Stream) YouTube video by TNCourts 2

I can’t recommend Dr. Holloway‘s book (“Living in Infamy: Felon Disfranchisement and the History of American Citizenship”) highly enough. I relied on it heavily in drafting the complaint and she was a really excellent witness. More to come tomorrow!

Link for Day 2: m.youtube.com/watch?v=f4Wn...

Pamela Moses v. Mark Goins, Tre Hargett, and Jonathan Skrmetti (Day 1 - Tuesday January 20th Stream) YouTube video by TNCourts 2

Day 1 of our trial challenging felony disenfranchisement in Tennessee is complete! Some really excellent testimony from our expert, Dr. Pippa Holloway, the preeminent historian of felony disenfranchisement in the South.

Video here: m.youtube.com/watch?v=WQCj...

JUST NOW: Rep. @brotherjones.bsky.social arrives at the start of the new Tennessee legislative session with a huge “ABOLISH ICE” flag

i just watched this video and the fact that they believe this to be exculpatory is genuinely insane

Alongside @protectdemocracy.org, our brief urges SCOTUS to reaffirm what is outlined in both the U.S. Constitution and the Electoral Count Reform Act: States have the responsibility and authority to set rules governing ballot receipt deadlines, subject to modification by Congress.

Screenshot of the cover page of our amicus brief in Watson v. RNC with a blue "FILED" stamp

NEW: We filed an amicus brief urging the U.S. Supreme Court to uphold state laws that protect voters against disenfranchisement due to mail delays outside of their control: campaignlegal.org/update/urgin...

Meme of obviously stressed out man with a cigarette and another dozen or so in his hand

MLS left backs as of this morning