Plushy Socks, Lover of Hugs ✡️

I know this general point has been mentioned a million times but if a story antagonist said this it would be called "heavy handed"

I don't expect it to get all the way through One Piece

But honestly Id love to see how they do the late stuff and I'm both frightened yet curious about the prospect of live action gear 5

Also reminder that Captain Marvels best friend is a guy that was given a serum that made him a furry

Noooo theyre supposed to be friends!!! 😭

I would argue that the fact that Donald Trump is not in jail for raping little girls with Epstein is more responsible for the normalization of pedophilia than every “problematic drawing” that has ever existed on the internet combined.

Oh yeah, even if I think some of the anime versions are better, they were *impeccably* cast

I think I'll need to see Alabasta and Sky Island first, Sky Island is integral to Robin because it's when her and the crew really form a bond, and I think I need to see that before I can make a verdict

And even then I STILL might need to wait till "I want to live" to really know

This isn't even a knock against the live action crew, they're cast excellently

I just think Zoro and Chopper work better with anime aesthetic and animation

But Sanji and Usopp are like my last favorite anime ones xD

Nami just gets more to do in live action

So far my thoughts on each Straw Hat in Live Action

Sanji - Live Action is better
Zoro - Anime is better
Usopp - Live Action is better
Nami - Live Action is better
Chopper - Anime is better
Luffy - They're the same person, Iñaki Godoy is just literally Luffy, neither is better, they're the same

people who abuse animals dont abuse animals because they saw art of it; they abuse animals because they want a power dynamic where the victim cant say no. which is also why children tend to be abused by teachers, nurses, clergy, and family/friends. not by artists or those who share art

most people who have been the target of this have know this and been vocal about it for years, but almost nobody wants to stand up and protest until they're about to be the target

You mean the problem isn't about what gets people off, but the actual action of harming someone???

It's almost like the actual problem is actions that cause harm and not nebulous aesthetics and fantasies and thoughts and ideas

For me it was vanilla porn :D Like, just pretty typical mundane no kink added porn

Using trauma as ammunition to prove a point that inherently absolves abusers of their actions with a shifted frame of mind focusing on art and not the person themselves is both dangerous and adds to the cycle of no one being able to heal.

Because fascism can only live so long as it has a minority to blame things on. That's like the core of fascism, is convincing that all your problems are because of a minority we can get rid of, because they're too fucking stupid to realize they're being duped themselves in the name of power

artwork of an anthro male bunny standing with his back to the viewer wearing a rabbit themed unbuttoned onesie and a very full pink themed diaper. he is looking back over his shoulder with one paw under his chine and a ditzy dumb tongue-out look on his face, and a pacified clipped to his ear. text on the bottom and top of the image reads: "Anyways. Teehee *shits cutely*" and a faded text bubble leading offscreen reads: "Did you drop me just to dress me up and make a meme picture? I swear if you show this to ANYONE... Ough, I make em look good tho..."

anyways, teehee~

For real though I hate the term "talking back" cause half the time it's just adults on a power trip not accepting anything a child says in defense of themselves

Oh hey I got 2k followers

Anyway NOBODY is saying the things we're defending aren't repugnant. That's a total strawman.

The actual argument is "If these things aren't defended then they'll come for EVERYTHING, including your nice and safe and clean little kinks".

Also the "it could be used by abusers" is an absolutely insane argument because logically speaking, ANYTHING could be used by abusers, that's why they're fucking abusers. That's like saying a spoon could be used to scoop out someone's eyeball so we shouldn't have spoons. Like what are you SAYING.

"strange"
"gross"
"might be disgusting"

None of these are actual arguments showcasing material harm. You do not get to say "it disgusts me personally so it should be banned everywhere". Your personal discomfort restricts YOU, not everyone else.

Anyway any porn can be used for grooming. You can use vanilla all adults porn for grooming and using what someone else *might* do with art is not an argument against the art, you cannot hold art responsible for what someone else chooses to do with it

Like "cub might be used for grooming" is also a bad argument, but at least I understand the mental logic of "this might be used to convince someone younger that it's okay" but that logic falls apart with feral, what are they going to do with it???

The "feral might be used for abuse" thing especially gets me. Like, in what way? How will it be used for abuse? Is a zoophile going to groom a dog by showing it feral porn? I legit don't understand what they think it will be used for lmao

My sister did this to me once

YEET

Omgosh hiiiiiiii

Aye aye o7

OH OKAY SO WE'RE JUST CALLING OUR SHOTS NOW ARE WE??