:/
06.03.2026 14:57
👍 1
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
:/
I definitely would not say "reviewers agreed..." it seems a bit dangerous to put words on reviewers' mouths!
Btw you didn't have to quote me...
Oh my god it has happened!!!!!
Technical Reading, Week 7: "Comment on Computer Rendering of Fractal Stochastic Models", Mandelbrot's angry letter to future Pixar folks about the crapola Genesis Sequence in Star Trek 2: Wrath of Khan.
(His views, not mine.)
dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/...
Haha, came here to post this, but you beat me to it!
www.achewood.com/assets/img/0...
Yeah truly disgusting
yaledailynews.com/articles/gel...
If someone refers an undergraduate student to a known sex offender for a job, and includes a comment about how good-looking the student is in their recommendation letter, that someone should never be allowed to teach undergraduate students ever again.
!?!? book!?!?
Same here....
My Spanish degree worked like this too... though admittedly I hated those exams withe every fiber of my being
The CVPR review period is *Dec 18 to Jan 12*? Damn....
(FYI it seems like they no longer appear "by default" over abstracts, at least in the cases I've tested)
Screenshot of a paper entry: Fictional Failures and Real-World Lessons: Ethical Speculation Through Design Fiction on Emotional Support Conversational AI Authors: Faye Kollig, Jessica Pater, Fayika Farhat Nova, Casey Fiesler (There are tabs with "abstract" and "summary" and "summary" is selected.)
The ACM Digital Library, where a LOT of computing-related research is published (I'd say at least 75% of my own publications), is now not only providing (without consent of the authors and without opt-in by readers) AI-generated summaries of papers, but they appear as the *default* over abstracts.
This is really, really bad!
I was like "ah what a shame that I was not around for that!" and then I scrolled down lol
Writing code on a bumpy train and tried stabilizing the display image to my head -- it does (surprisingly) make things a bit easier to read but overall feels too weird to actually use.
This is crazy haha I love it
WHAT!?
The Graphics Replicability Stamp Initiative (GRSI, www.replicabilitystamp.org), a community-driven initiative to promote replicability in Graphics research, is seeking volunteers.
More details in the 'Volunteering' section of the home page.
Looks pretty! Hope you're happy there, Claas :)
What!??! That's crazy. Where were you when I was moving furniture??
A drawing of two clusters one cluster has a blonde girl with a ponytail in it, and the other cluster has a redhead a blonde and a brunette. This represents the scene and mean girls where Gretchen tells Regina George “you can’t sit with us!”
“it’s October 3rd”
Happy K-Mean Girls Day to those who celebrate
cvoelcker.de/blog/2025/re...
I finally gave in and made a nice blog post about my most recent paper. This was a surprising amount of work, so please be nice and go read it!
Best illusion I've seen in a while
This is the metareview
How can one reconstruct the complete 3D interior of a wood block using only photos of its surfaces? 🪵
At SIGGRAPH'25 (Thursday!), Maria Larsson will present *Mokume*: a dataset of 190 diverse wood samples and a pipeline that solves this inverse texturing challenge. 🧵👇
My opinion: let people have fun! Life is too important to be taken seriously
