GENERAL STRIKE! BOYCOTT EVERY DAY!!🀬's Avatar

GENERAL STRIKE! BOYCOTT EVERY DAY!!🀬

@austin-native

Former R/D S/W Design. Lupus/Lyme/Resistance #NATIONALBOYCOTT πŸ«‚πŸŒˆ #GENERALSTRIKE U.S. is owned by a Dictator now. The COUP was successful. REVOLT! ‼️GENERAL STRIKE‼️ πŸ”₯DON'T SPEND. πŸ”₯DON'T BORROW. πŸ”₯BUY LOCAL. πŸ”₯ #NATIONALBOYCOTT

14,733
Followers
21,453
Following
3,972
Posts
18.11.2024
Joined
Posts Following

Latest posts by GENERAL STRIKE! BOYCOTT EVERY DAY!!🀬 @austin-native

Methinks he doth protest too much.

06.03.2026 23:10 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 1 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

"Beware the Ides of March!"

And, of one were to believe in astrology, one would see that trump's chart is signaling something "very bad, maybe the worst in history" on March 15th.

This information is free. Just tossing a little hope out there...

07.03.2026 00:52 πŸ‘ 2 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Brrruuuuuuuuutal stark numbers. Worse than republicans even normally do.

06.03.2026 23:33 πŸ‘ 2 πŸ” 2 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0
BRIEF FOR APPELLANTS
USCA Case #25-5310
β€’ Document #2162591
Filed: 03/06/2026 Page 2 of 97
STANLEY E. WOODWARD, JR.
Associate Attorney General
ABHISHEK S. KAMBLI
Deputy Associate Attorney
General
U.S. Department of Justice

BRIEF FOR APPELLANTS USCA Case #25-5310 β€’ Document #2162591 Filed: 03/06/2026 Page 2 of 97 STANLEY E. WOODWARD, JR. Associate Attorney General ABHISHEK S. KAMBLI Deputy Associate Attorney General U.S. Department of Justice

INTRODUCTION
Courts cannot tell the President what to say. Courts cannot tell the
President what not to say. They cannot tell the President how to handle
national security clearances. And they cannot interfere with Presidential
directives instructing agencies to investigate racial discrimination that
violates federal civil rights laws. Nor can they interfere with Presidential directives instructing agencies to review contracts or regulate government building access based on those same racial-discrimination
and national-security concerns especially where such directives have
not yet been implemented.
Ignoring those constraints, the district courts below bent over
backwards to facially invalidate every section of four Executive Orders
without considering their plainly constitutional aspects and applications.
This appeal of those sweeping decisions is not about the sanctity of the American law firm; it is about lower courts encroaching on the constitutional power of the President to discuss and address invidious racial discrimination, national security risks, and other problems with
certain law firms.

INTRODUCTION Courts cannot tell the President what to say. Courts cannot tell the President what not to say. They cannot tell the President how to handle national security clearances. And they cannot interfere with Presidential directives instructing agencies to investigate racial discrimination that violates federal civil rights laws. Nor can they interfere with Presidential directives instructing agencies to review contracts or regulate government building access based on those same racial-discrimination and national-security concerns especially where such directives have not yet been implemented. Ignoring those constraints, the district courts below bent over backwards to facially invalidate every section of four Executive Orders without considering their plainly constitutional aspects and applications. This appeal of those sweeping decisions is not about the sanctity of the American law firm; it is about lower courts encroaching on the constitutional power of the President to discuss and address invidious racial discrimination, national security risks, and other problems with certain law firms.

In recognition of those problems, many law firms agreed to address
their practices and commit to providing pro bono work in the public
interest.1 These consolidated appeals concern four Executive Orders
("EOs") through which the President addressed risks from four other law
firms: Perkins Coie LLP ("Perkins"), Jenner & Block LLP ("Jenner"), Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale & Dorr LLP ("WilmerHale"), and Susman Godfrey LLP ("Susman"). The substantially similar EOs directed a
review of plaintiffs to ensure that the Federal Government's dealings
with them are consistent with our Nation's civil rights laws, national
security, and other public interests. In response, plaintiffs raised facial
challenges under the First, Fifth, and Sixth Amendments. Four district
courts issued permanent injunctions against the four EOs. That was
error, because the EOs are well within the Presidential prerogative.
1 Allen Overy Shearman Sterling LLP; Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP; Kirkland & Ellis LLP; Latham & Watkins LLP; Milbank LLP;
Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP; Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP; Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP; and Wilkie Farr & Gallagher LLP.

In recognition of those problems, many law firms agreed to address their practices and commit to providing pro bono work in the public interest.1 These consolidated appeals concern four Executive Orders ("EOs") through which the President addressed risks from four other law firms: Perkins Coie LLP ("Perkins"), Jenner & Block LLP ("Jenner"), Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale & Dorr LLP ("WilmerHale"), and Susman Godfrey LLP ("Susman"). The substantially similar EOs directed a review of plaintiffs to ensure that the Federal Government's dealings with them are consistent with our Nation's civil rights laws, national security, and other public interests. In response, plaintiffs raised facial challenges under the First, Fifth, and Sixth Amendments. Four district courts issued permanent injunctions against the four EOs. That was error, because the EOs are well within the Presidential prerogative. 1 Allen Overy Shearman Sterling LLP; Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP; Kirkland & Ellis LLP; Latham & Watkins LLP; Milbank LLP; Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP; Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP; Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP; and Wilkie Farr & Gallagher LLP.

NEW: After starting the week by announcing it was dropping the appeals, two political appointees at DOJ filed the government's brief backing Trump's law firm executive orders, previously declared unconstitutional by four different district court judges.

Background: www.lawdork.com/p/doj-to-dro...

07.03.2026 00:14 πŸ‘ 179 πŸ” 46 πŸ’¬ 8 πŸ“Œ 9
Post image

I've Ben using Caligula's name to reference the big, baby dictator for a while now.

Great minds, right?

07.03.2026 00:47 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Macron nailed it!

07.03.2026 00:37 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

πŸ€­πŸ€£πŸ€£πŸ€£πŸ€£πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ‘πŸ‘πŸ‘

07.03.2026 00:35 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

what the....

04.03.2026 15:38 πŸ‘ 15 πŸ” 8 πŸ’¬ 2 πŸ“Œ 0

so so sick of him...you?

05.03.2026 13:38 πŸ‘ 23 πŸ” 9 πŸ’¬ 6 πŸ“Œ 1

Riley's testament is hard to listen to, but it's important that all of us know the enormity of trump's crimes & psychopathy. He is a born killer who rapes girls & boys for fun, & there is the cannabalism of infants, but that is not described in the 1st or 2nd tapes.

He's not repairable.
#25th

07.03.2026 00:28 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Yes. Ideally the Secret Service would escort him to prison. I just think our legislators really do want a dictator. I hate to say it, but most of them are getting very rich with him, and there are the Epstein Files, of course.

Have you heard the audio of Sascha Riley?

07.03.2026 00:14 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

I understand. I recently read that liquor is easier on the liver than wine, but esp. beer. I've had an unopened bottle of scotch in my office for about 25 years. I opened it during lockdown/pandemic, but it's been untouched for 3 years until now.

"War! What is it good for⁉️"

Oh, I hate the felon.

07.03.2026 00:10 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

Charlotte went to heaven at the end of January. heartbroken. then vet got us two new girls so i wouldn't have a breakdown. Phoebe and Ginger...sisters

06.03.2026 14:23 πŸ‘ 2 πŸ” 1 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Exactly. Starting a war for another country (Isreal) because they have Kompromat (Epstein Files) on you, is unforgivable. Why is he not being impeached?

06.03.2026 00:35 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

πŸ™πŸŒΉ

05.03.2026 14:10 πŸ‘ 28 πŸ” 12 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

Rightfully so. It's certainly his fault. I'm drinking a shot of scotch every night now, and it's all his fault. I'm not a victim, it's just the effing truth.

06.03.2026 00:31 πŸ‘ 2 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
a sign that says smile tomorrow is friday ALT: a sign that says smile tomorrow is friday

gotta log off and prepare the taxes...ugh...hope you all win the lottery and share!πŸ¦‹

05.03.2026 15:23 πŸ‘ 11 πŸ” 3 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

she felt very special

13.07.2025 13:04 πŸ‘ 417 πŸ” 42 πŸ’¬ 52 πŸ“Œ 4

She should! She IS very special!

I'll bet she's also a very good girl. πŸ’™πŸ’™πŸ’™πŸ’™ God, I love dogs. πŸ’™πŸ’™πŸ’™πŸ’™

06.03.2026 00:27 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

The plan is to discredit all election results before the midterms because Republicans are losing!

06.03.2026 00:02 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 1 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0
Mark Knopfler - Brothers In Arms (Berlin 2007 | Official Live Video)
Mark Knopfler - Brothers In Arms (Berlin 2007 | Official Live Video) YouTube video by Mark Knopfler

I'm crying...
youtu.be/EMRJT2ebvAk?...

04.03.2026 23:10 πŸ‘ 3152 πŸ” 625 πŸ’¬ 198 πŸ“Œ 51

This must be corrected, and the policy MUST BE STOPPED!

06.03.2026 00:00 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

The reason we have β€œstupid rules of engagement” is to make sure we don’t bomb elementary schools.

05.03.2026 23:15 πŸ‘ 22492 πŸ” 5522 πŸ’¬ 604 πŸ“Œ 173
Video thumbnail
05.03.2026 23:59 πŸ‘ 11 πŸ” 10 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

Oh, such a VOICE! He's a chameleon! Instant fan here. πŸ’™πŸ’™πŸ’™πŸ’™πŸ’™πŸ’™πŸ’™πŸ’™πŸ’™πŸ’™πŸ’™πŸ’™

05.03.2026 08:14 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Love him!
Even teacher was playing at Pilates today!

05.03.2026 07:31 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 1 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
Hoozier Listen to Hoozier on YouTube Music - a dedicated music app with official songs, music videos, remixes, covers, and more.

HEY, BLUE SKY‼️

TAKE AN EMOTIONAL/ MENTAL BREAK WITH ME‼️

seriously!
music.youtube.com/playlist?lis...

05.03.2026 07:28 πŸ‘ 2 πŸ” 1 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

That's because the COUP President is an out of control MAD KING!

04.03.2026 22:18 πŸ‘ 2 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

Nope...

#Iran

#Epstein

#EpsteinFiles

04.03.2026 14:05 πŸ‘ 5815 πŸ” 2086 πŸ’¬ 101 πŸ“Œ 65

OOPS.....TEXAS SUPREME COURT

04.03.2026 16:12 πŸ‘ 5 πŸ” 2 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0