White text on blue background with CAT logo. Text is a quote saying "China's 15th five year plan is a missed opportunity.
While it continues to strongly emphasise clean energy development, it could have gone further.
A 17% reduction in carbon-intensity target would actually allow China's emission to increase by 3% under a conservative GDP growth.”
China released its 15th Five-Year Plan (FYP). The plan reinforces the rapid expansion of clean energy, but it does not translate this momentum into stronger binding emissions targets.
Read our full reaction here 🔗 climateactiontracker.org/press/reacti...
06.03.2026 10:55
👍 16
🔁 14
💬 0
📌 1
“Tamboran…donated $169,500 to both sides of politics ….Tamboran Resources plans to sell fracked gas to the NT government, and develop a major LNG project at the Middle Arm Sustainable Development Precinct in Darwin, which has been allocated $1.5 billion in equity by the Federal Labor Government.”
04.02.2026 08:00
👍 1
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
“Australia’s largest oil and gas company, Woodside, donated $53,775 to the Australian Labor Party and $40,140 to the Coalition prior to the 2025 Federal Election. Just 25 days after the election, the government conditionally approved extending the company’s North West Shelf LNG plant out to 2070.”
04.02.2026 08:00
👍 0
🔁 0
💬 1
📌 0
Dirty data: How coal and gas money fuelled 2025 election campaigns
By Claire Snyder
What fossil fuel companies paid to Australia’s political parties in 2025 federal election and what they seem have gotten in return.
cheekmedia.substack.com/p/dirty-data...
04.02.2026 08:00
👍 5
🔁 4
💬 1
📌 0
Bottom line: Don’t confuse “hard” with “obsolete.” The world doesn’t need permission to lower ambition. It needs governments to implement what they already agreed—at the speed and scale that 1.5°C demands.
30.01.2026 03:54
👍 3
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
And let us not forget that the Paris Agreement’s 1.5°C warming limit remains the world’s enduring legal, political, and moral anchor for climate action – abandoning it would only deepen injustice for vulnerable communities already bearing the brunt of climate change.
30.01.2026 03:54
👍 1
🔁 0
💬 1
📌 0
In all this that should not be forgotten that since 2015, the Paris Agreement has provided quantified targets at national and global levels consistent with limiting warming as close as possible to 1.5°C.
30.01.2026 03:54
👍 1
🔁 0
💬 1
📌 0
Whilst “Clean-energy shift” can be a useful slogan it can’t replace the temperature limit and by itself generate the time bound actionable targets needed to protect us from dangerous climate change.
30.01.2026 03:54
👍 1
🔁 0
💬 1
📌 0
The Paris Agreement provides the basis to design critical clean energy benchmarks to limit overshoot as low as possible and get warming back below 1.5° by 2100. Without the 1.5C limit it is unlikely that the right benchmarks would be calculated or chosen.
30.01.2026 03:54
👍 1
🔁 0
💬 1
📌 0
On geoengineering: the push for risky interventions grows because of delayed action not because of the 1.5oC limit. The answer is not to abandon 1.5°C—it’s to act fast enough so we don’t drift into an “anything goes” approach unguided by what we need to protect ourselves from and call it pragmatism.
30.01.2026 03:54
👍 1
🔁 0
💬 1
📌 0
This scenario shows the time bound actionable targets needed globally to strictly limit overshoot and reduce warming below 1.5° by 2100. For example, renewables capacity needs to grow significantly, with a 3.5-fold increase by 2030 – ahead of the global tripling goal agreed at COP28.
30.01.2026 03:54
👍 1
🔁 0
💬 1
📌 0
In terms of a clean energy shift this highest possible ambition scenario shows that global electricity generation needs to quadruple by 2050, with wind and solar supplying over 90% of electricity demand by then. Fossil fuels would be effectively phased out shortly afterwards.
30.01.2026 03:54
👍 2
🔁 0
💬 1
📌 0
This work shows how to minimize overshoot and return to well below 1.5°C by 2100 with renewables, electrification, efficiency, methane cuts, deforestation reduction—reaching net zero around ~2060 if governments deliver.
30.01.2026 03:54
👍 2
🔁 0
💬 1
📌 0
These climate targets provide the tools to design the critical time bound benchmarks for a clean energy shift to limit overshoot as low as possible and get warming back below 1.5° by 2100. Without this framework there is not real anchor for these benchmarks.
30.01.2026 03:54
👍 2
🔁 0
💬 1
📌 0
COP28: Global Renewables And Energy Efficiency Pledge
Read the Global Renewables and Efficiency Pledge. Global leaders unite to transition away from unabated fossil fuels to meet Paris Agreement goals by 2030.
The Paris 1.5° limit provided the rigorous basis for @cop28.bsky.social in 2023 to agree 1.5C aligned clean energy targets - tripling renewables, doubling efficiency, reductions in methane and deforestation by 2030, and transition away from fossil fuels.
www.cop28.com/en/global-re...
30.01.2026 03:54
👍 2
🔁 0
💬 1
📌 0
Overshoot management isn’t “wait until 2100 and see,” as the article suggests.
The Paris Agreement climate goals provide the indispensable scientific basis for what benchmarks for clean energy, energy efficiency, methane reductions and deforestation action are needed and by when.
30.01.2026 03:54
👍 6
🔁 1
💬 1
📌 1
We all agree we need actionable targets to guide policy.
But here is the big thing: The Paris Agreement’s climate goals - the1.5oC limit and net zero in 2nd half of the century - provide the essential and critical legal and scientific basis for what clean energy targets are needed and by when.
30.01.2026 03:54
👍 2
🔁 0
💬 1
📌 0
2025 set to be second or third warmest year on record, continuing exceptionally high warming trend
First: yes, we’re heading into overshoot @wmo-global.bsky.social 1.5°C in the next 5 years. This is not a geophysical accident. It is the result of policy failure. Now what's needed is action to limit the magnitude and duration of overshoot to drive temperatures back down.
wmo.int/news/media-c...
30.01.2026 03:54
👍 3
🔁 0
💬 1
📌 0
As we breach 1.5 °C, we must replace temperature limits with clean-energy targets
Actionable goals are needed to guide the world towards what needs to happen most quickly: shifting economies to clean energy sources.
A commentary in @nature.com argues the 1.5°C temperature limit has “outlived its usefulness” because we’re headed towards overshoot and should be replaced by a “clean-energy shift” metric. That’s the wrong diagnosis. Here is why.
www.nature.com/articles/d41...
30.01.2026 03:54
👍 21
🔁 8
💬 1
📌 1
Through the heatwave haze, the hypocrisy of Australia’s fossil fuel policy shines bright | Clean Air
The heatwave in Melbourne and Adelaide this week is likely to become the norm. We should prepare now
Extreme heat is blasting eastern Australia. It’s driven by fossil fuels, development of which the Albanese government continues to support.
The Guardian Australia’s climate/environment journalist calls it out
@adammorton.bsky.social @theguardian.com
www.theguardian.com/environment/...
28.01.2026 01:21
👍 7
🔁 3
💬 0
📌 0
Rising Tide protest: climate activists stop three ships from entering world’s largest coal port in Newcastle
NSW police arrest 141 people as campaigners demand federal government cancel planned fossil fuel projects and tax existing operations at 78%
Rising Tide protest: climate activists stop three ships from entering world’s largest coal port in Newcastle
NSW police arrest 141 as campaigners demand govt cancel planned fossil fuel projects + tax existing operations at 78%
By @jordynbeazley.bsky.social
www.theguardian.com/environment/...
30.11.2025 08:27
👍 75
🔁 24
💬 3
📌 2
Last year, the world added a record 582GW of #renewables energy capacity. That’s over 91% of all new power – with #nuclear nowhere. In fact, each year, nuclear adds as much net global power capacity as renewables add every two days.
30.11.2025 10:28
👍 81
🔁 32
💬 6
📌 1
Vor fast genau zehn Jahren begann die historische Klimakonferenz von Paris. Ein guter Anlass, mal zu schauen, was sich seitdem in Deutschland verändert hat. (1/10)
27.11.2025 11:19
👍 308
🔁 113
💬 4
📌 4