Eve Wong 💫 Pigeon Era

It’s being delivered tomorrow 💗

Exactly 💕

@dojoloachz.bsky.social they are all so adorable! Now I need to figure out where to put them!

My babies are going to eat so good 💕

Barn owl in 3/4 profile, half-closed eyes, closed beak smile. VERY "Sexy and I know it."

Rizz (n.) - From charisma. A measure of charm used by human fuckwits.

🦉✨

Come at me, fuckwits.

#ModernspeakTranslated

#ATagWithGrant #HashtagGame

you can tell she taught him how to do mirror selfies

#helluvaboss

はあはあ春コミ新刊ちょっと終わり見えてきたので週末サンプルあげれたらいいな〜っと

My lil job application buddy ❤️ #pigeon #petpigeon #pigeonsky

Such a sweet face 💗

Pigeon, 04 May '16. #PigeonSky 🪶

I know 😢💔 I’m the worst

The funniest thing is that she doesn’t desire oats, she desires rice. She will scrape my hand (ouch) to push the oats away and find the precious grains!

I finally did it 😭 I almost forgot.

Okay. If I'm going to be feeding my pigeons daily, I need to buy some high-brand bird seed.

When it comes down to it, Stolitz is a sexually consensual relationship within an ethically dubious structure. Season 2 marks the end of that arrangement and the beginning of a reversed, but more communicative dynamic.

It's SO narratively rich and I wouldn't have it any other way ✨

(12/12)

In canon, Blitz redirects or refuses advances at times and even “rewards” Stolas when he provides something Blitz needs. Stolas is initially unaware of Blitz’s motives, but once he realizes the potential pressure the arrangement creates, he dissolves it.

(11/12)

5) Mutual desire is present.

[Not gonna waste my time finding pictures, you degenerates (affectionate) can do that yourselves]

(10/12)

4) Negotiation occurs

(9/12)

3) No punishment follows resistance

(8/12)

2) Refusal is possible and accepted.

(7/12)

Structural imbalance creates the potential for coercion, but it does not automatically negate consent. Consent within structural imbalance must be evaluated case by case.

Consent remains meaningful if these conditions are present:

1) No intentional leveraging of fear occurs.

(6/12)

— not Blitz, who retains agency.
In Truth Seekers, Blitz envisions himself as willingly approaching Stolas.

His subconscious reveals his true conflict: cognitive dissonance. Blitz desires Stolas but then that means accepting a reliance on royalty that he prides himself on rejecting.
(5/12)

Blitz stole the grimoire for his business and leverages his sexuality to keep it. Stolas proposes an arrangement where both get to use the book and continue having sex every month. This creates economic dependency which the story addresses through Stolas —

(4/12)

Structural pressure, on the other hand, is more complicated. It exists when a power imbalance is built into the system: economic dependency, arranged marriage, class hierarchy. The pressure exists because of context, not because someone is actively weaponizing it.

(3/12)

Active coercion is abuse. It happens when someone intentionally overrides another’s will through threats, punishment for refusal, or deliberate leverage of fear. In those cases, “consent” isn’t meaningful because refusal carries imposed consequences.

(2/12)

Emotions and technicalities aside, the issue with discourse is that it misapplies ethical terms. 🧵

The most common mistakes I see are the following:
> Structural pressure is EQUAL to active coercion
> Consent CANNOT exist within unequal systems regardless if meaningful agency remains.
(1/12)

I keep feeling like there’s two sides of myself at war—one who loves and misses Prince Stolas and his magic and power and fluffy cape, and the other part loves soft, broke bitch Stolas who doesn’t yet realize he’s free.

I think what I’m trying to say is I love that fucking bird

This angle makes the eyes much more expressive 💕

I can’t resist when they make that
:> face…
They’re SO cute! 😭💞
#HelluvaBoss #Blitzø #Stolas

Oooh is he a grumpy boy?