So, a lot of people on here don’t seem to fully grasp the import difference between a chatbot like chat gpt, and an agent like Claude. Or why for most tasks Claude is vastly more powerful than chat gpt even when linked to a fundamentally weak model.
Moreover, the available changes are random and usually small. It had to pick from the menu presented to it even if it’s clear that better menus are possible.
Evolution is path dependent. It doesn’t get to asses what the long term optimal adaptations are. It selects for changes that are beneficial in a specific environment at a specific time. No redos if these bring along with them negative effects that become apparent later.
Probably thinks it’s what you do to warm up before hitting the weights room.
Andy Dessler points out that reliance on fossil fuels is bad, not only for climate and for air pollution and mining waste, but also for energy security and military spending.
open.substack.com/pub/theclima...
Good for the environment though
This would have worked better if Starmer had joined in on the bombing but I made do.
Live shot of the government protecting us from inevitable and unavoidable shocks.
He’s experienced in the US election process, so aware there is no logic to it.
Must be friends with prince andrew
Key to trading is not understanding fundamentals, but the mindset of those who control capital.
Capital had a bias towards not seeing Trump is a fraud. As belief erodes under the weight of reality, profits will follow.
Imagine using grok for literally anything. Gtfo CNBC
Yeah the leverage of max is gigantic. If you don’t have a lot to do it’s not for you. If you do have a lot to do it will provide the solutions for all the new stuff it discovers you have to do.
Angry teenager you say? Kemi is making progress.
Gasoline is petrol, not natural gas. This chart is mixing up two very different things.
Agree
I think you need to reframe it in the positive: We would only get involved in response to some action by Iran.
That’s a fairly unhinged response to Carney’s comments. It’s rare that “no, not under any circumstances” is a sensible statement.
Wrong way round. Insurance creates the WILLINGNESS for ship owners to navigate the strait, it does nothing for the ABILITY of the crew to avoid getting killed.
I was not
Your man is guilty of nothing more than a botched attempt to hide his rampant pedophilia.
Counterpoint: Everyone knows he was better friends with Epstein than even Donald. The premise that anything was concealed is clearly false,
There is no evidence he concealed it
If I was religious I’d pray for a hell for them to go to.
