Graph of award probability of R35 and R01 from NIH factbook as a function of review rank percentile. As is apparent, 2025 is a significant departure, with lower award probabilities at all scores <40 and significant departures from norm, where even being in the top 10% is no longer a nearly certain indicator of success.
Data source: https://report.nih.gov/nihdatabook/report/302
The data is in: the NIH goalposts have shifted.
What were once almost certain fundable scores have become coin flips and what used to be likely grants have become aspirational, leading to fewer awards.
Another manifestation of how HHS policies have led to fewer awards and less science.
07.03.2026 01:59
👍 625
🔁 375
💬 19
📌 57
As a kid I fell behind on my vaccinations because it was hard for my single mom to take time off work to take us to the doctor. We got vaccinated when the school sent a letter saying they'd kick us out. That's public health: not judging people, but making it harder for them to make the wrong choice.
07.03.2026 02:31
👍 13
🔁 1
💬 0
📌 1
Job Opening: Data Scientist – Grant Witness
Grant Witness seeks a data scientist for a full-time position on our team tracking changes to U.S. federal grantmaking. We are also hiring for part-time/contract positions. Join us!
Grant Witness is hiring! We're seeking a full-time data scientist to join our team building data resources to support journalism, litigation, and activism protecting science, public health, and the rule of law. grant-witness.us/apply.html #rstats
06.03.2026 21:14
👍 61
🔁 43
💬 1
📌 5
AHRQ has been hit even harder than NIH. They have no grant making staff at all.
06.03.2026 23:46
👍 54
🔁 32
💬 0
📌 0
Current NIH leadership want you to think they are using rigorous, consistent & scientific processes to screen studies to align them with agency priorities.
But the process that they have put down on paper is a sham.
It’s important to know NIH is not following its own guidance. Here’s why:
🧵1/
06.03.2026 14:35
👍 197
🔁 125
💬 4
📌 10
Ok pals. Looking to move all my teaching materials open and online, and am developing new modules that I want to start off this way. Content = reading, quizzes, videos, and code tutorials. Opinions on the best platform? Good examples of best practice I can steal from? Many thanks.
06.03.2026 11:52
👍 31
🔁 12
💬 10
📌 1
What a remarkable statement. Both true and chilling.
"It is clear that the sum of US policy choices amount to mortality worse than a COVID-19 pandemic, ongoing, year after year" @gavinyamey.bsky.social
06.03.2026 02:38
👍 67
🔁 18
💬 2
📌 0
Data Visualization
A Practical Introduction
Here’s a full draft of the upcoming second edition of my “Data Visualization: A Practical Introduction”: socviz.co
05.03.2026 22:54
👍 515
🔁 164
💬 12
📌 15
Laoganma looking at you as if you mildly disappointed her
MFW I see authors resubmit their paper at a different journal without any edits after they have received extensive constructive feedback during peer review.
06.03.2026 07:53
👍 81
🔁 4
💬 6
📌 0
Woman using microscope
Americans continue to have confidence in scientists working at CDC, NIH and FDA — but less so their agency leaders, a new national poll finds www.annenbergpublicpolicycenter.org/stark-divide...
05.03.2026 18:30
👍 7
🔁 4
💬 0
📌 1
NIH reneges on recognizing union for early career researchers
The biomedical research agency says trainees in its labs are not “employees”
NIH sent notice this week that it will no longer recognize a union of early career researchers on the basis that trainees aren't "employees." My latest for @science.org.
www.science.org/content/arti...
05.03.2026 18:18
👍 27
🔁 11
💬 0
📌 0
Appreciate the answer. And good luck!
05.03.2026 01:01
👍 0
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
Could be. Headings, tables, figures, tables of contents, occasional equation. Nothing too fancy. Your typical professor-writing-a-paper functions.
05.03.2026 00:57
👍 2
🔁 0
💬 1
📌 0
Ok I am genuinely curious about this. I see posts like this all the time yet have used Word nearly every day for 20+ years and have never encountered any problems. Everything works as it should. Are we using different software versions? Why such a different user experience?
05.03.2026 00:47
👍 3
🔁 0
💬 2
📌 0
Highlighted Topics | Grants & Funding
As NIH moves to parent NOFOs another resource for finding out what topics are of interest. grants.nih.gov/funding/find...
03.03.2026 22:44
👍 16
🔁 12
💬 0
📌 1
Keep your eyes peeled for quacks in study sections. Case in point Richard Frye in the newish SEP that reviews autism grants I do know it is one person among many legit scientists, but I am concerned this is the start of a bad trend...
03.03.2026 19:19
👍 12
🔁 9
💬 4
📌 2
Update: On the last day possible, NIH/HHS have extended the terms of all 6 members of the minority-health institute council.
Their terms will now expire on 8/27/26 and can't be extended any further.
Without new voting members, the institute won't be able to fund applications at the 2/12/27 council
03.03.2026 15:39
👍 17
🔁 11
💬 0
📌 1
This is not just cursed, its monstrous. The digital resurrection of a historian who died in January of this year, all so Grammarly can get some more clicks and engagement from students and/or scholars and/or others.
It feels so wrong on so many levels, these ghosts enslaved to AI forever
03.03.2026 13:15
👍 979
🔁 456
💬 23
📌 61
Heads up US demographers. Our main NIH study sections (SSPA/SSPB) are being disbanded. I don’t know what this means. public.csr.nih.gov/StudySection...
03.03.2026 02:53
👍 23
🔁 17
💬 4
📌 0
Now hiring: #Postdoc in Rural Maternal & Perinatal Health (#NIH U01) at USC @uscarnoldschool.bsky.social
Seeking a scholar committed to #RuralHealth #MaternalHealth equity and high-impact #research dissemination.
Apply: uscjobs.sc.edu/postings/201...
@academyhealth.bsky.social @apha.org
27.02.2026 15:48
👍 4
🔁 9
💬 0
📌 0
Are there people at the University of Maryland - say in government, policy, or sociology programs - that have studied NIH or the US science funding agencies?
feel free to DM
02.03.2026 22:29
👍 0
🔁 1
💬 1
📌 0
1. Are you an emerging aging research scholar? Consider the Butler-Williams Scholars program. The summer session is now accepting applications! The deadline is 2026/03/31, and the program will be 2026/08/03-2026/08/06. Qualified applicants must hold a doctorate (e.g., Ph.D., M.D., D.O., Dr.P.H.).
03.03.2026 00:45
👍 2
🔁 3
💬 1
📌 0
At a recent talk, I was asked about including the generic unobserved confounder U in a DAG. I said I thought it was useless. You should include actual named unobserved confounders. And if you can't think of any, you should be forced to say, explicitly, "we could not think of any other confounders"
02.03.2026 14:18
👍 12
🔁 2
💬 4
📌 0
All true but it's frustrating that we might have been spared a lot of this but for the Lancet publishing Andrew Wakefield's fraudulent study in 1998
28.02.2026 21:16
👍 576
🔁 136
💬 9
📌 3
MICHIGAN STATE CAPITOL, EAST LAWN
1:00pm - 3:00pm
STAND UP FOR SCIENCE NATIONAL DAY OF ACTION MARCH 7TH
LANSING! Join your local March 7th rally to take back our science! Learn more at standupforscience.net/march7
#March7
#rally
#standupforscience
#March7Lansing
#science
01.03.2026 17:16
👍 53
🔁 22
💬 0
📌 1
The NIH Restructuring Congress Rejected Is Happening Anyway
(I used Gemini Nano Banana 2 to create this fictional image.)
This piece by Elizabeth Ginexi is a must read. Trump, Vought, RFK and Bhattacharya are destroying the NIH simply ignoring the law and the US Congress. It’s illegal and immoral. The NIH Restructuring Congress Rejected Is Happening Anyway open.substack.com/pub/elizabet...
28.02.2026 10:12
👍 115
🔁 63
💬 2
📌 4
Once again our first thoughts should be of human cost of conflict in Middle East, price paid and risks incurred by innocents.
28.02.2026 09:50
👍 763
🔁 200
💬 10
📌 5
Finally had some inspiration to play with the 'colorpalettes' package in @statacorp.bsky.social.
Tried out one of the Wes Anderson palettes (originally made for R, I believe) and now I feel like I've been missing out for the past several years... 😕
27.02.2026 19:50
👍 0
🔁 1
💬 0
📌 0