This was published in 2024 and references a 2022 study. If you won’t even try to update, you’re a news source worth blocking.
This was published in 2024 and references a 2022 study. If you won’t even try to update, you’re a news source worth blocking.
Why?
Why are you trashing another activist? Delete this divisive shit now - don’t act like some cointelpro operative!
When arch-conservative Bill Kristol is saying ICE and CPB are so violently corrupted that reform is not possible, you know we’ve into dystopian crisis.
If you have to lie about what I’ve said for a comeback, you’re a frivolous person. Bye.
If you seriously want to win, you make coalition with the largest number of people possible.
live your life in such a way that you aren’t defending kidnapping a 5-year-old
You’re the one inside the tent fighting to keep others out. But now, perversely, you’re suggesting we have to make you entirely comfortable before you’ll stay in the coalition. But a coalition requires we work with people we aren’t always comfortable with. And that is how history tells us we win.
Some of us think the most crucial thing is to bring people together to stop fascism and restore democracy and human rights - full stop. Then there are people like you.
Shaming people for recognizing the horror late is a great way to disincentivize them standing up at all.
Meanwhile, the right praises and welcomes any liberal who comes aboard.
This is how the left once again squanders its once-in-a-century opportunity for radical change.
Heroes. And at the pulpit, another version of the German pastors who supported Hitler.
Robert, your work still gets me every time. I’d love to do a decades-later follow up shoot one of these days. 😘
As per @pluralistic.net.web.brid.gy : now that Canada is being decoupled from the U.S. by Trump’s aggression, isn’t this the perfect opportunity - maybe in concert with the EU - to repeal all anti-circumvention laws?
Ah, the Bari Weissification of CBS News continues.
And now the censorship is even worse.
So happy to hear that - I think it was unintentional: calling out guys (correctly) for being hostile to femmes got mixed up with calling men who just want a fully masculine sex experience “frail” & then conflating their bottoming with femininity. I really want to heal this divide somehow.
@hungerff.bsky.social Just found your podcast and love it. But was a little thrown at the December 19 episode when you seemed to conflate men turned on by masculinity with men who shame gender variance in others. Gender isn’t just about body parts or sexual positions - so why the disrespect?
“Propaganda” isn’t a magic word to make evidence you don’t want to face disappear. But given the way Israel is currently ramping up its own evidence-denying propaganda (aka Hasbara) it takes a special kind of ghoulish chutzpah to aim the accusation at those seeing Israeli war crimes on video.
As you well know, not only do Israeli forces regularly and openly use Palestinians as human shields, but Israel has even conducted polls that show Israeli citizens approve. Your brazen, morality-free chutzpah is the most Israeli thing about you.
apnews.com/article/isra...
Sorry, your facts are wrong: Israel was regularly killing Palestinians right up to October 7 - just as they have continued killing and starving them since the latest fake “ceasefire”. None of this began October 7, and none of the babies and children were Hamas. Stop justifying genocide.
if @neguse.house.gov has to *rewrite your dumb question* about Donny’s shutdown on the fly? you absolutely suck at journalism www.reddit.com/r/Destiny/s/...
The Israeli army killed more than 100 Palestinians, including 46 children, in the Gaza Strip since Tuesday evening. Unfortunately to people like you, only Israelis count as human.
If you actually read them both, you’d see that one article says reheating makes it worse if you use too much heat but even at lower temperatures makes no difference. The BBC article, on the other hand, says reheating makes resistant starch get even more resistant.
But Republican gerrymandering is a-ok with the courts? GTFOH
“Yes, the ceasefire is off when we want to kill you, but it’s back on the minute we’re done. And if you retaliate we’ll blame you for violating the ceasefire.”
Tell me you didn’t read the article without telling me you didn’t read the article.
It’s the part where they say that reheating it too hot will reduce resistant starch. But the BBC reports that reheating will actually *increase* resistant starch
We have an issue with your reporting: according to a study referenced in this BBC piece, reheating cold actually *increases* resistant starch. Can you update your reporting to address this? www.bbc.com/news/magazin...
If you read the article you would know they talked about that.
“Typically” is the squishy word: it doesn’t mean the stops *must* be brief and to the point. He could have said “as long as they are brief, nonviolent and make a swift determination” but he chose not to. But he’s probably quite proud of this fact.