I use it a lot. Just checked my Saved list and it looks correct for at least 6 months back.
07.03.2026 10:39
👍 1
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
I use it a lot. Just checked my Saved list and it looks correct for at least 6 months back.
The Bafta slur incident really turned out to be a great litmus test for people/groups where the moral compass is stuck (broken). It's still right once every rotation. ;-)
And for the really clever observer: note any correlation with any other subject of popular outrage?
Every time you go away
It’s also absolutely not how evolution works.
www.theguardian.com/books/2024/j...
Wow.
i love the kinds of illusions that completely disappear as soon as you squint your eyes. they're like a tiny little light-hearted prank rather than complete destruction of everything you thought was real.
Management fallacy to believe you can actually measure an individual’s performance. Someone recently won a Nobel prize proving that. Performance is always to a much much bigger extent the propensity of the local social system than down to the ability of an individual.
#NihilismAndTechnology
Wow. Always new reasons for thinking badly of beamers. 😆
Yes, that is a reasonable argument. As was pointed out to me: we have seen the owner of the hellscape promoting hellish ideas, we have not seen that from substackers and that difference matters.
I was sorry to see it. All the exhausting curve balls modern life has in store for us.
Very good points. Some apply to me too, e.g. 3. Some I agree with. Let me ponder. Might change my mind. :-) thank you for taking the time.
Survey looks designed to produce the result it did?
It was a genuine question, so yes, I would like your answer.
FYI, I have bought three of your books (so far), recommended your work to my social and professional circles. I am not telling you you are wrong, but I find your use of substack puzzling.
If you left Twitter for moral reasons, how can you stay on substack? Why i never will pay for a substack. @iandunt.bsky.social @naomialderman.bsky.social
That’s an idealistic dream and not how social reality works. And that misunderstanding is a core reason why Brexit happened.
I believe, journalists had a major role to play in why it became unsafe for politicians to say it. And while @iandunt.bsky.social wasn’t one of them, blaming the politicians is pointing the finger in the wrong direction.
Also, the article is paywalled and he’s oblivious to the irony.
As if normal people buy iPhones every day. Brought to you from the PoV where privilege is like water to a fish.
How did you validate your theory that non-privileged people would not suffer when unsubscribing? (You did, right?)
Kid Rock is exclusively for people who clap on the 1 and 3
I've been working on this one for a while. It's about how we got here, and where we're going. I hope you'll read it to the end. Gift link: www.theatlantic.com/politics/202...
I have wondered before if Grounded Theory has opened up the flood gates, so to speak, for this kind of unscientific practice. I am not sure one can draw a clear boundary between the two?
Although the confidence that they can anticipate what we need for parliamentary democracy in 60 years is adorable.
Headline shows that decision making in this process is dominated by people who are either incompetent (there for the wrong reasons) or focused on maximising their benefit. Example for @iandunt.bsky.social next edition of www.weidenfeldandnicolson.co.uk/titles/ian-d...
www.bbc.co.uk/news/article...
I am delighted that you do.
s/shouldn’t/cannot
And trying to do so will amputate the knowledge.
This should be reported as a bribe that makes Amazon money, not as a movie that loses Amazon money...
