Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Modified Teukolsky formalism: Null testing and numerical benchmarking. Fawzi Aly et. al. https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.01456
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Using thermodynamics to learn gravitational wave physics. Caio César Rodrigues Evangelista et. al. https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.21261
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Kinetic Route to Helicity-Constrained Decay. Dion Li https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.17514
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
New solution to the hyperon puzzle of neutron stars: Quantum many-body effects. Hao-Fu Zhu et. al. https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.07939
Figure 1
Figure 2
{Realisation of the MBH binary signals observed over 4 years in LISA. Here we consider $ $ sources (thin black lines). Their total power results from the addition of individual GWs with differing phases (shown are the actual sum and the sum in quadrature, blue lines). The residuals computed with ...
Top panel: Residuals calculated from $10^3$ draws from the representative population distributions discussed in section {sec:Methods:pop
Limits of vacuum-template subtraction for LISA massive black hole binary sources in realistic environments. Lorenz Zwick https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.06684
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Kerr-Newman-de Sitter black holes in $f(R)$ gravity with constant curvature: horizon structure and extremality. Alikram N. Aliev et. al. https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.06661
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Gravitational Noether-Ward identities for scalar field. Tomislav Prokopec https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.22958
Apparent Phantom Crossing in Gauss-Bonnet Gravity. Shin'ichi Nojiri et. al. https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.06279
$ ^{CC
Figure 2
: angular resolution in direction reconstruction for ORCA6 (dark purple) and ORCA115 (light purple). Right: $ $ of ratio between reconstructed and true energy. Comparison to a MLF reconstruction algorithm is also shown in orange color.
$ ^{CC
Enhancing low energy reconstruction and classification in KM3NeT/ORCA with transformers. Iván Mozún Mateo (on behalf of the KM3NeT collaboration) https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.18999
Figure 1
Figure 2
-law GWB model parameters $( {10
\% credibility upper limit on $ {
Constraining the gravitational-wave emission of core-collapse supernovae with ground-based detectors. Jingwang Diao et. al. https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.23829
Scattering of non-relativistic finite-size particles and puffy dark matter direct detection. Wu-Long Xu et. al. https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.10641
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Novel very-high-frequency quasi-periodic oscillations of compact, non-singular objects. Jens Boos et. al. https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.00986
Cosmological Perturbation in New General Relativity: Propagating mode from the violation of local Lorentz invariance. Kyosuke Tomonari et. al. https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.18772
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Incorporating curved geometry in cosmological simulations. Julian Adamek et. al. https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.20606
‑Newtonian potentials with $N_1=7$ (purple line) and $N_1=1$ (turquoise line), constructed using the constraints presented in sections {sec:ISCO
‑Newtonian potentials with $N_1=7$ (purple line) and $N_1=1$ (turquoise line), constructed using the constraints presented in sections {sec:ISCO
General form for Pseudo-Newtonian Potentials, imitating Schwarzschild geodesics. Itamar Ben Arosh Arad et. al. https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.15107
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Simultaneously search for multi-target Galactic binary gravitational waves. Pin Gao et. al. https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.09300
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Explainable classification of astronomical uncertain time series. Michael Franklin Mbouopda (LIMOS et. al. https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.00869
IRAC color–color diagram of the MIR sources. The small gray dots represent all IRAC sources selected in the COSMOS. The region bounded by dashed red lines marks the MIR-AGN selection region of {2012ApJ...748..142D
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Identifying Compton-thick active galactic nuclei in the COSMOS. II. Searching among mid-infrared selected AGNs. Xiaotong Guo et. al. https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.01453
Hess diagrams for the {
left panel: the color-magnitude diagram of the 100 pc white dwarf population classified into DA and non-DA by {JE2023
Figure 3
WDLFs in the $9<M_G<11.5$ range for different values of $g_{ae
New axion bounds derived from the 100-parsec Gaia DR3 white dwarf luminosity function. Martín L. Alberino et. al. https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.00901
$M$--$R$ curves for four externally validated EoSs with NN=valid and TOV=valid. Solid curves correspond to full TOV integrations, while the NICER credible regions for PSR~J0030 and PSR~J0740 are overplotted as observational constraints {Miller2019_ApJL_J0030,Riley2019_ApJL_J0030, ...
Empirical coverage for classification and regression under Standard and Mondrian CP as a function of $ $. All curves track the nominal $1- $ within sampling noise, indicating that the calibrated quantiles correctly characterize the residual distribution. Mondrian's stratified calibrat...
–radius relations $M$--$R$ for the valid EoS subset (amber background), overlaid with NICER constraints for PSR~J0030+0451 and PSR~J0740+6620. Outer contour boundaries are solid; inner credible levels are dashed.
Mean prediction–interval width for the four regression targets as a function of $ $. Interval widths decrease monotonically as the acceptance threshold relaxes. Mondrian yields narrower intervals when class–conditioned residuals are less variable, reflecting improved efficiency withou...
Certified Uncertainty for Surrogate Models of Neutron Star Equations of State via Mondrian Conformal Prediction. Marlon M. S. Mendes et. al. https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.19363
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Euclid preparation. Impact of galaxy intrinsic alignment modelling choices on Euclid 3x2pt cosmology. Euclid Collaboration: D. Navarro-Gironés (1 and 2 and 3) et. al. https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.16448
{Corner Plot of Fit Posteriors.
{Pre-fit Phase-folded Light Curve.
{Centroid Motion Analysis.
{Hot Jupiter Population Comparison.
Statistical Validation and Photometric Characterization of the Hot Jupiter Candidate TOI 7475.01. Biel Escolà-Rodrigo https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.14840
Halo mass functions (HMFs) for CDM (solid lines) and ULDM (dashed lines, for $m_{22
The mass spectrum of SMBHs as a function of redshift. The black horizontal line denotes the minimum masses of SMBH seeds $M^{min
The minimum mass $M_J$ (the thick lines) and the maximum mass $M_{upper
Little Red Dots and Supermassive Black Hole Seed Formation in Ultralight Dark Matter Halos. Dongsu Bak et. al. https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.21676
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Euclid preparation. Galaxy power spectrum modelling in redshift space. Euclid Collaboration: B. Camacho Quevedo (1 and 2 and 3 and 4 and 5) et. al. https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.20826
Mathematical Anatomy of Neutrino Decoherence in Red Turbulence: A Fractional Calculus Approach. Yiwei Bao et. al. https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.20313
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
SN 2024abvb: A Type Icn Supernova in the Outskirts of its Host Galaxy. Maokai Hu et. al. https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.01333
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Cosmic Himalayas in CROCODILE : Probing the Extreme Quasar Overdensities by Count-in-Cells analysis and Nearest Neighbor Distribution. Yuto Kuwayama et. al. https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.24966
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Discovering gravitational waveform distortions from lensing: a deep dive into GW231123. Juno C. L. Chan et. al. https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.16916
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
The frame-dragging vector potential on galaxy scales from Dark-Matter-only Newtonian $N$-body simulations. William Beordo et. al. https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.08703
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Polarimetric and spectropolarimetric observations with FoReRo2: Instrument overview and standard star monitoring. Yanko Nikolov et. al. https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.05670
