Oh, I almost forgot! Grok was asked to roast musky boy today and it's fucking good! π
π€£π
I don't & would never use it, but this is funny. Tomorrow Grok will be down for "adjustments." Lol.
@boslough
Physicist, airburst specialist, planetary defender, & CSI Fellow. I'm critical of the Younger Dryas impact hypothesis (YDIH) which has strong links to global warming denial, creationism, & pseudoarchaeology. It relies on misinformation & fake peer review.
Oh, I almost forgot! Grok was asked to roast musky boy today and it's fucking good! π
π€£π
I don't & would never use it, but this is funny. Tomorrow Grok will be down for "adjustments." Lol.
I guess you are saying we donβt know then π€·ββοΈ
Kristi Noem is more famous for killing a puppy, but I would argue that this was worse.
Another hockey stick graph.
Has it reached peak yet? I took my daughter there in 2019 and want to go back!
βThe chronic ongoing problem, for nearly two decades, is that the Younger Dryas Impact Hypothesis proponents withhold the evidence they claim to have,β Boslough said. βWhen independent scientists ask to see it β in the form of materials, for example β we are attacked for βsuggesting fraud.ββ π
Jason Colavito: "In Brief: Two Papers Retracted in New Blow to Younger Dryas Impact Hypothesis. PLOS journal retractions impacts Graham Hancock & other claims comet impact sank Atlantis w/Great Flood mythology. Comment: Doesn't mean no comet or flood, just bad science in papers tinyurl.com/ycyy6df2
Billionaires make more money selling stuff.
This is what happens to scientists when we ask the Comet Research Group if they can share even the tiniest morsel of evidence for their impact hypothesis: βHow DARE you!β
youtu.be/KWJNugT8i7U?...
Four (4) papers counting this one: www.nature.com/articles/s41...
Nobody does more to suppress the evidence for the Younger Dryas impact hypothesis than the Comet Research Group itself. #YDIH
The Younger Dryas Impact folks just suffered two new retractions. Errors ranged from missing data and AI hallucinations to the misidentification of marine plankton as comet dust.
Thanks to @boslough.bsky.social for chatting.
π§ͺπΊ
New at @retractionwatch.com
The Younger Dryas comet impact "theory" is dying a not-fast-enough death.
Donβt know these so I must be doing something right.
Every night from 6 to 6:05
They're calling it SuperBenghazi.
Oh, the wall is breaking.... Let's stop this stupid habit.
#DaylightSaving
www.cbc.ca/news/canada/...
"Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired signifies, in the final sense, a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, those who are cold and are not clothed."
-Dwight D. Eisenhower, 1953
Why did federal prosecutors ask New Mexico to drop its investigation into Zorro Ranch in 2019? And why are these files not in the file release by the DOJ under the Epstein Files Transparency Act?
It also makes it clear that dictators should monitor polymarket for advance warnings of attacks.
"You have more in common with the average Iranian than you ever will the pedos you're fighting for."
post from Department of War @DeptofWar OPERATION EPIC FURY
damn they really made Operation Epstein Fury so fucking easy
It will be interesting to see some of this glass of George can track it down. Heβs been on the case for at least a month now. youtu.be/KWJNugT8i7U?...
No, Abu Hureyra was a legitimate archaeological excavation in the early 1970s. The CRG found a huge amount of glass in excavated sediments that the leader of the original dig somehow missed. Sadly, their large collection of glass seems to have gone missing. George is trying to find it though.
Itβs a pity they had to create their own vanity journal to publish this!
It was such a promising idea! They had five papers lined up to publish! web.archive.org/web/20230614...
Itβs a sad story. MDPI rejected their first attempt at creating their own journal. web.archive.org/web/20230802...
How could we have misrepresented evidence that has never been revealed? Pictures of material with unknown provenance or chain of custody is not legitimate evidence. Dots and lines on paper with no underlying data or methodology does not count either. Show us the actual data!