Douglas Natelson's Avatar

Douglas Natelson

@nanoscaleviews

Physicist, occasional wiseass. Feed for Nanoscale Views (http://nanoscale.blogspot.com). Nanoscale@sciencemastodon.com. He/his. These opinions are my own, obviously, and don’t represent my employer. (Annoyed that I feel like I have to say that.)

4,002
Followers
756
Following
617
Posts
04.10.2023
Joined
Posts Following

Latest posts by Douglas Natelson @nanoscaleviews

Holy cow. Was the idea to lower open access publishing charges and replace that with a submission fee? Or just a straight up submission charge for NPG journals?

06.03.2026 12:00 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0

Please tell me that wasn’t a real question.

06.03.2026 01:13 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0

Doesn't inspire a ton of confidence that anyone is going to read submissions to a government RFI when you don't even get an autogenerated acknowledgment for sending in a response.

05.03.2026 14:18 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

Are polymarket or kalshi allowing betting on whether Paxton ends up as head of DHS or US Attorney General between now and November? I would watch the betting lines closely. Fractal corruption = someone inside the administration will try to monetize the likely quid pro quo.

04.03.2026 20:00 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

🧪⚛️ From the Nature article by @dangaristo.bsky.social et al., we know that NSF only got its OMB authorization last week. Still, this is very worrying. If awards fall far behind last year despite a budget down ”only” 4%, it will be a basic defiance of congressional appropriations.

01.03.2026 15:07 👍 32 🔁 20 💬 2 📌 0

engineering.thetafleet.net/Journals/Oth...

01.03.2026 11:22 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

🧪⚛️ Looks like some agency leadership is trying to stick w the administration’s preferences regardless of the appropriations. If this continues for long, it will be an even bigger mess, and it doesn’t look like there are quick correctives.

27.02.2026 16:28 👍 2 🔁 2 💬 1 📌 0
Preview
NSF officials break silence on how AI and quantum now drive agency grantmaking Leaders acknowledge White House role in controversial moves

The National Science Foundation is systematically being converted to the National AI and Quantum Research Foundation.

“I see it as the administration exerting political control over what has traditionally been NSF’s ability to fund the best science.”

27.02.2026 12:18 👍 654 🔁 347 💬 21 📌 29

That’s quite a bold forecast. So, anything between paradise on earth and human extinction?

26.02.2026 18:42 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 2 📌 0

I’m sure having the accused investigate themselves will not lead to any problems. (There’s a reason why scientists don’t review their own papers.)

26.02.2026 04:13 👍 2 🔁 2 💬 0 📌 0

Odds that they got the permission of Feynman’s estate for use of his name and likeness?

24.02.2026 18:35 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0

I am sure that sufficiently complicated ML/AI networks will exhibit emergent responses as you describe. (I think there's a solid argument to be made that consciousness is an example of this.) I don't know whether present networks are that large.

22.02.2026 19:31 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
Preview
AI/ML, multiscale modeling, and emergence I've been attending a lot of talks lately about AI/machine learning and multiscale modeling for materials design and control.  This is a vas...

🧪⚛️ Some incoherent thoughts about AI/ML, materials, multiscale modeling, and emergence. nanoscale.blogspot.com/2026/02/aiml...

22.02.2026 17:26 👍 5 🔁 2 💬 3 📌 0
Post image
21.02.2026 20:10 👍 5090 🔁 1917 💬 963 📌 206

Remember, in TX: This is exactly what Greg Abbott, Ken Paxton, Dan Patrick, and the rest all want.

21.02.2026 04:57 👍 2 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

Yep, and that is absurd and wrong. I said "for the searchable portion" - apologies for not being clear

20.02.2026 23:12 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

🧪⚛️ Any updates out there about whether NASA science funds are still being held up by OMB despite the appropriation?

20.02.2026 17:55 👍 5 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0

I could see an argument about fraud (in the sense that "full self-driving" has been touted as just about ready for several years), but I don't think data supports an argument that Teslas are more dangerous than other cars.

20.02.2026 17:46 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

Ummm, if we didn't do that for all of the major automakers and parts suppliers (airbag explosions, anyone?), then we shouldn't do it for Tesla even if their CEO is deeply problematic.

20.02.2026 16:13 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0

There's three votes for anything on the supreme court. If trump said "I'm the god-king of arrakis" he'd get three votes and a lengthy opinion about the long history and tradition of english common law with regards to the spice melange

20.02.2026 15:41 👍 5477 🔁 949 💬 92 📌 39
 

You know for the searchable portion you can just look, right? www.justice.gov/epstein

20.02.2026 14:35 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0

I'm up to 6.5 weeks now on one of our papers.

19.02.2026 15:17 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

I have to hope that anyone who led an Ivy League scramble band can't be *all* bad. (writing as 1992-3 president of the high stepping sonic glory of the Princeton University Band)

19.02.2026 14:15 👍 0 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

🧪 Survey: What is a reasonable time period between receipt of referee reports by the editor and some decision being sent to the authors, at a high impact journal?

17.02.2026 22:41 👍 3 🔁 2 💬 4 📌 0

Paramount's censorship of this Colbert interview w/ Rep. James Talarico will get more people to watch than if it had aired on TV.

100K views on YouTube in just 2 hours. And counting...

youtu.be/oiTJ7Pz_59A?...

17.02.2026 07:13 👍 460 🔁 205 💬 14 📌 12
Post image

Tonight’s dumb napkin cartoon…

16.02.2026 23:52 👍 29550 🔁 5704 💬 215 📌 163

I was today years old when I first heard this - thanks very much!

15.02.2026 23:21 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

It’s a favorite from my youth!

15.02.2026 14:16 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0

🧪 @instantclassicspod.bsky.social, I wanted to point you to this book, page 77, where it defines the Helen as the unit of beauty, and the milliHelen as the amount of beauty required to launch one ship. www.chrispennello.com/tweller/Scie...

15.02.2026 13:13 👍 8 🔁 1 💬 3 📌 0

The $38.3 billion they are going to spend for interment camps could fund the annual budget of NASA, the EPA, and all clean energy R&D at the Department of Energy—combined.

14.02.2026 03:14 👍 1864 🔁 932 💬 68 📌 36