Chris's Avatar

Chris

@momtok

Impatiently waiting for my Star Trek future. Retired scientist, currently living the nightmare of Cassandra. Sewing, knitting. She/her in NC WA

847
Followers
1,731
Following
1,167
Posts
17.10.2024
Joined
Posts Following

Latest posts by Chris @momtok

crayon napkin drawing of USS
MOTHER Fucker (enterprise d)
BoLDLy Fucking your Shit up

crayon napkin drawing of USS MOTHER Fucker (enterprise d) BoLDLy Fucking your Shit up

idk where i found this or what the context is but i like it

02.01.2026 17:10 ๐Ÿ‘ 706 ๐Ÿ” 121 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 18 ๐Ÿ“Œ 7

I HATE Family Circus. I hate Jeffy, Barfy, Billy, Dolly, everyone! I hate it so much that I beeline right to it when I open the paper just so I can give myself a daily annoyance. Makes me feel alive.

07.03.2026 17:46 ๐Ÿ‘ 10 ๐Ÿ” 1 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

When this movie came out, something told me no don't do it. I survived all these years only to wind up watching it a couple weeks ago. It is AWFUL. Always go with your gut.

Same story w Top Gun. When I was finally bullied into watching it recently, that same feeling was there. The worst movie.

07.03.2026 17:40 ๐Ÿ‘ 1 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0
Preview
wall e from the movie wall e is standing on a rocky surface Alt: wall e from the movie wall e is standing on a rocky surface

I already saw this movie

06.03.2026 17:27 ๐Ÿ‘ 0 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

This is so heartbreaking.

06.03.2026 17:17 ๐Ÿ‘ 1 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

This is my cue to tell the story of the post-mortem on a chicken pox death I got in the lab. The internal lesions were *everywhere*; brain, liver, stomach, lungs...everywhere. This individual suffered greatly. Chicken pox is no joke. So thankful for the CP vaccine!

06.03.2026 17:16 ๐Ÿ‘ 2 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Great digging here on Platner. Let's not fall for this sham of a man.

06.03.2026 16:43 ๐Ÿ‘ 1 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Not RFKjr, the diseased culinary expert with a silver spoon up his ass lecturing us on how to cook dead bears.

05.03.2026 18:42 ๐Ÿ‘ 0 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Bring back DEI and Pride, stop helping those ICE fucks and maybe I'll consider coming back.

05.03.2026 16:36 ๐Ÿ‘ 1 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

MGP is such a fucking disappointment. Good luck to Hennrich!

05.03.2026 01:01 ๐Ÿ‘ 2 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Polis is likely being blackmailed.

04.03.2026 23:39 ๐Ÿ‘ 2 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

What a great shot!

04.03.2026 23:36 ๐Ÿ‘ 1 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Clothes used to be crazy expensive, and it would be highly impractical to just buy new dresses if you lost/gained weight. They were designed to be able to absorb those changes.

04.03.2026 23:33 ๐Ÿ‘ 2 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

I meant I was not being pro-capitalism by suggesting fashion provide us with built in size-adjusting. I am being critical of it. If I don't have to keep buying all the time, I am not being a dutiful, capitalistic consumer.

04.03.2026 23:28 ๐Ÿ‘ 3 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Yes we agree, I know my history. I was speaking to regular ppl not those who can afford couture and can just buy more Dior pencil skirts when they gain/lose. I was suggesting fashion doesn't really offer adjustable clothing as a concept. I don't mean stretch pants and knits.

04.03.2026 23:15 ๐Ÿ‘ 2 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

I didn't finish my Marilyn point. In no way would MM pull a 16 off the rack now and expect a fit. That's vanity sizing.

04.03.2026 21:53 ๐Ÿ‘ 0 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

FWIW Marilyn Monroe was a size 16.

04.03.2026 21:51 ๐Ÿ‘ 0 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Vanity sizing is the marketing response to consumers wanting a smaller number on the label irrespective of the inches of the garment. What used to be a 16 is now called an 8 because the smaller number appeals to the consumer. Sewists know this bc patterns retain the inches = size.

04.03.2026 21:48 ๐Ÿ‘ 2 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

No I don't mean fast fashion, which everyone should reject. I mean styling and design. Think of a kilt, there is adjustability built in vs pencil skirt. Fitted blouses vs wrap style. Fitted bodice vs belted shift. You can't buy them, they're not there.

04.03.2026 20:58 ๐Ÿ‘ 5 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Of course it makes me a bad capitalist to promote such ideas.

04.03.2026 20:34 ๐Ÿ‘ 1 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

And the solution can't be wrap-around skirts ๐Ÿ™„. If we were SMART we would embrace styling that allows for natural changes. I found a skirt pattern based on 1850s construction that does the trick. It's brilliant and would obviate the need to keep buying with every inch +/-.

04.03.2026 20:33 ๐Ÿ‘ 5 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Thanks for this discussion. I'm a sewist and it occurred to me that modern styling has no wiggle room for weight gain/loss. 200ya clothes weren't like that, it would've been impractical to buy new clothes for pg, normal gain etc. Fashion DEMANDS money to be spent constantly. We should reject that.

04.03.2026 20:29 ๐Ÿ‘ 17 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 2 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

I was just thinking of how Judy Garland was treated by her studio. It's so shocking and heartbreaking. You could be Judy Fucking Garland and STILL not be good enough by some made-up standard.

04.03.2026 20:15 ๐Ÿ‘ 2 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

It's like those gross pussyshavers. Just admit you get turned on by little girls and leave us women alone.

04.03.2026 20:11 ๐Ÿ‘ 0 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

I agree. I used to date a man who was an inch shorter than me. WOW was he hung the fuck up over that.

04.03.2026 20:05 ๐Ÿ‘ 2 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

Your grandma was a straight up bitch for saying that.

04.03.2026 20:01 ๐Ÿ‘ 4 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

I'm a sewist and was speaking from the perspective of clothing design, not vanity sizing (a concept that makes me boil with rage). It's easy to *design* clothing that will look "good" on ppl who are stick thin. It takes more skill to design for real, curvy women.

04.03.2026 19:42 ๐Ÿ‘ 2 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

I need every one of these right now.

04.03.2026 18:32 ๐Ÿ‘ 0 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

I have never been so desperate in all my life.

04.03.2026 18:30 ๐Ÿ‘ 0 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 0 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0

It takes a lot of skill to robe all body styles. Size 0 is a tube sock and anyone can design that.

04.03.2026 16:48 ๐Ÿ‘ 9 ๐Ÿ” 0 ๐Ÿ’ฌ 1 ๐Ÿ“Œ 0