Sounds familiar.
@davidpeetz
Researcher, FASSA. Employment relations; labour markets; economics; pol science; gender; climate & finance; science; birdies. Carmichael Fellow at Centre for Future Work, Australia Institute, but views mine. Meanjin (Brisbane) & Tāmaki Makaurau (Auckland).
Sounds familiar.
Barely a week to go! Apply now for the job of your lifetime!
Guardian headline: “Bob Carr, ‘a masterpiece’ and a hornet queer fantasy”
And this, kids, is why we need Oxford commas…
The G8, to which Adelaide University belongs, has now signed up to be part of the business class. So it is no surprise that it has done this, even though it is deeply disappointing and very much against the traditional role of universities.
www.bca.com.au/our-insights...
"President Trump has been anointed by Jesus to light the signal fire in Iran to cause Armageddon and mark his return to Earth"
Mandala's R&D stuff is at mandalapartners.com/uploads/Unlo...
But yeah, blame federal regulation and say that cutting it will "lift innovation, attract investment and support stronger growth".
Ha!
I love how they say "A recent AICD-Mandala report showed federal regulation imposes a $160 billion cost annually."
They also showed that large Australian businesses are now in "retreat from R&D investment" (p7) and that R&D by Australian businesses is only half the rate in peer countries (p.8).
I think they’re not *backing* the business lobby. They’ve become *part of* the business lobby.
That’s literally what this is.
Any more evidence needed on whether top Australian universities have lost their way?
The only time in his speech he used the word “war”.
He’ll come to regret it (or at least, his advisers will). Many in Congress don’t like presidents declaring war without their authorisation. A bit hard now for him to pretend it’s just a special military operation.
He was shot from behind. No crime.
It appears, from the video, to be an ambush.
No wonder that the IDF 'declined to say why it was withholding Jad's body.'
What was the child’s crime?
The IDF said 'Jad threw a rock and was a "terrorist" who "attempted to attack the force”.'
But 'footage emerged showing one of the soldiers entering the scene from out of shot, dropping a heavy object next to Jad, then taking a picture of the object next to him.'
In the West Bank.
I must admit, the headline is a bit misleading.
“Stood around” implies passive indifference.
But actually "As Jad lay collapsed in an alley, the soldiers created a cordon around him and blocked two Palestinian ambulances from reaching him."
www.bbc.com/news/article...
Horribly chilling.
“Years from now, someone will write about this period the way we now write about Munich & Berlin & London &
New York in the 1930s. They will describe the weather. The headlines. The conversations that seemed harmless at the time.“
open.substack.com/pub/thinkbig...
Here’s a great job for someone — CEO of the Centre for Future Work.
Applications due 15 March.
www.ethicaljobs.com.au/members/futu...
People with perfectly good cholesterol levels take statins daily, just so that they can tell their the spouse that they can’t eat grapefruit.
Also, as I mentioned in the original post, @epi.org references the @laboraction.bsky.social report, which documented 298 strikes last year. So the BLS measurement misses a lot.
Does DemosAU do national polls? If so, what is their ON? ON 21 in Qld state seems no higher than other states or nationally? And I think Resolve was only ON 16 in last Qld state. Yet Qld is (was?) the ON stronghold.
These are work stoppages involving 1,000 or more workers.
Our Christian beetrooter
30 across the whole US is indeed an incredibly low bar.
I did like “Now he’s sweating"
Will be interested in the response.
Yep, EY would definitely be telling them that they have a chance of getting a refund because they had to lower their export prices, even though they didn’t pay the tariff, and that EY could help them get that refund.
Here’s a great job for someone — CEO of the Centre for Future Work.
Applications due 15 March.
www.ethicaljobs.com.au/members/futu...
Indeed. And why would the ABC think it’s OK to reproduce and publicise such rubbish?
This isn’t even both-sidesism.
Consumers deserve over 90% of the value of the refunds. They won’t get it.
The rest of the cost was absorbed by US importers (who will get all the compensation) and overseas exporters (who’ll get none).
A huge mess that Trump created by his illegal acts.
Where does it say in the SCOTUS decision, or in any of the American commentary on it, that overseas exporters would be eligible for a refund?
What is EY talking about?
Since when did Australian exporters pay Trump’s tariffs? They’re paid by American importers.
www.abc.net.au/news/2026-02...