Laia Garrobé's Avatar

Laia Garrobé

@garrobe

PhD student @ University of St Andrews. I quote High School Musical 2 whenever someone asks for the time. She/her

42
Followers
27
Following
10
Posts
18.12.2024
Joined
Posts Following

Latest posts by Laia Garrobé @garrobe

The former likely reflect animal movements, which is important information for managers in an area where interactions with shipping is a major conservation concern, while the diel variation likely represents varying amounts of foraging effort over the 24hr cycle.

02.01.2025 10:46 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 0 📌 0
Post image

Finally, we did also do some biology – both detectors showed strong seasonal and diel patterns in the presence of sperm whale clicks in all our sites in the waters between Ibiza and Mallorca.

02.01.2025 10:46 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0
Preview
kermit the frog is typing on a typewriter in a messy room . ALT: kermit the frog is typing on a typewriter in a messy room .

Problem is, models trained on one site don’t transfer well to unseen sites, so the next challenge to tackle is how to optimise transfer learning – minimising the effort needed to get a pre-trained model up to speed on a new unseen set of recordings… watch this space!

02.01.2025 10:46 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0

So if you have a trained NN model, the speeds are game-changing – but if you also have to train the model in the first place (which means lots of manual auditing to generate training data) then you haven’t gained much.

02.01.2025 10:46 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0

While performance metrics in terms of detection were similar, the neural network approach, once trained, took just *12hrs* on a desktop PC to analyse over 50k 4 min recordings (~3500hrs of data) while the ‘traditional’ detector took 352hrs.

02.01.2025 10:46 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0
Post image

... bear that it mind next time you read a paper where a single analyser did the auditing 🤔 The two detectors agreed with each other more than the humans. What even is truth?! We didn’t mean to prompt an existential crisis, yet here we are…

02.01.2025 10:46 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0

How do you test detectors? By comparing them to truth – but who determines truth? Humans. One striking result though was that even for very stereotyped species like sperm whales, humans agreed only around 70% of the time as to whether their clicks were present or not 😬...

02.01.2025 10:46 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0
Post image

... so we did using long term moored PAM data from our ongoing sperm whale project around the Balearic Islands

02.01.2025 10:46 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0

Deep learning is being increasingly used in bioacoustics with the promise of automatically analysing large datasets very rapidly. But whether its detection performance significantly improves existing techniques is less often asked...

02.01.2025 10:46 👍 1 🔁 0 💬 1 📌 0
Preview
Comparing neural networks against click train detectors to reveal temporal trends in passive acoustic sperm whale detections Passive acoustic monitoring (PAM) is an increasingly popular tool to study vocalising species. The amount of data generated by PAM studies calls for robust auto

New paper: Comparing neural networks against click train detectors to reveal temporal trends in passive acoustic sperm whale detections (DM lgf3@st-andrews.ac.uk for a copy) 🧵 pubs.aip.org/asa/jasa/art...

@pamguard.org @lrendell.bsky.social @seamammalresearch.bsky.social

02.01.2025 10:46 👍 20 🔁 4 💬 2 📌 3