I should probably stay out of this, but I feel like Robert is being a bit proscriptive here. As a fellow fictional vampire I think we need to be aware of our own power and how that intersects with human needs
I think most people who really care about these things will understand what that means.
The Guardian often reports data in a way which is a bit sensationalist and lazy. I'm describing how data is, in fact, used.
I don't read the Guardian, and I suspect it wasn't entirely clear, but I'm absolutely certain that the model authors intended to report changes from the previous London election.
influencers don't live in Dubai, they're just debris from a successful interception
Aside from the problems with this model, it's important to note that changing hands in a London ward involves moving quite a lot of people; changing hands in a council even more. However FPTP does mean that if a party gets to 30%, they're likely to win a disproportionate number of seats.
It would be highly unusual to report changes from current figures. It's standard practice to report changes from the previous election.
tbf, there's a risk that politics in football is bad for politics' reputation
tbf, you can't buy Polymarket shares directly with Visa or PayPal. You would need a crypto intermediary.
everything which is not personally approved by Wes Streeting is substantial and therefore bad
aww
had this exact thought
more like the Norfolk broads
canvassing:
idk, putting Love before Laugh is almost hipster
he'll march them up to the top of the hill and leave them there(?)
Reform: we only want white people to have families
I've read the judgement several times and I don't quite understand whether they mean "sex at birth" or "sex recorded at birth". I suggested at the time that they might mean "sex as recordable at birth by a third party [eg doctor or midwife]" which presumably could be alterable by a later assessment.
you mean, taxation with representation??
keep the written name but start pronouncing it "crossbox" with no explanation
You can't unintentionally fake data if you're following the process every other pollster follows. Unless you have a problem with the methodology, there's no point in questioning the data based on the pollster's affiliations. YouGov and Fox News do excellent polling.
They're a BPC member that abides by its rules. If you think the data is faked, I suggest you make a complaint to the BPC as this would be quite a serious issue. www.britishpollingcouncil.org/making-a-com...
In what universe should the lead candidate not campaign in favour of the third place candidate? It's this kind of entitlement and complacency that makes people hate Labour
yes. everyone fucked their computers so much, there was no time
we solved it through Y2KANSWR (y2k and non-stop wanking response)
I get that, but as a legal reality it's super weird
If I can offer an even hotter take:
OpenAI, NVIDIA, etc make great technologies which are not considered marketable.
LLMs capture most of the interest, not because they're all that these companies do or because they're the most cutting edge thing, but because of capitalism and greed.
I am persistently intrigued by the use of "biological sex", as it doesn't seem to have a precise or verifiable legal meaning. What's to prevent someone simply claiming that their biological sex at birth is male or female? It's not as if someone is going to get a witness statement from your midwife
Anything involving IQ tests *in any way* is eugenicist pseudoscientific bullshit and should not be anywhere near anything to do with disability provision. Might as well base it on their Myers-Briggs type or their star sign.
I think almost every culture has fusion food, but the US certainly has some special combinations
I know who David Farragut is because I read 24th century history
