Karl Schafer's Avatar

Karl Schafer

@karlschafer

Philosophy professor (UT Austin) and occasional philosopher | Kant's Reason (OUP): https://tinyurl.com/kantreason | https://philpeople.org/profiles/karl-schafer

3,009
Followers
917
Following
415
Posts
04.07.2023
Joined
Posts Following

Latest posts by Karl Schafer @karlschafer

Someone should invent a microblogging site where sarcasm is possible

12.03.2026 16:49 πŸ‘ 13 πŸ” 1 πŸ’¬ 3 πŸ“Œ 0

Asking Claude to rank Kant scholars just to feel something

10.03.2026 19:19 πŸ‘ 7 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

WRONG. Bodies that Matter is foundational for the Orange Catholic Bible. This is canon.

26.02.2026 18:31 πŸ‘ 3 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Tag line for philosophy as a discipline

26.02.2026 07:41 πŸ‘ 230 πŸ” 49 πŸ’¬ 8 πŸ“Œ 1

I know you all love Descartes, but if you ever find yourself in an evil demon scenario, do *not* try to reason your way out of it. Trust me on this one.

26.02.2026 16:01 πŸ‘ 7 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

It's a claim about the transmission of ideas, although exactly how self-conscious it is will vary a lot, I think.

15.02.2026 01:18 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Yes, here (as is often true) Deleuze is more perceptive than most!

14.02.2026 19:37 πŸ‘ 2 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

I would go further. Hume's *actual influence* on postmodernism (and existentialism, etc) is radically underestimated by the standard narrative. The often subterranean impact of Hume's philosophy is a secret thread running through much of (so called) "continental philosophy".

14.02.2026 19:11 πŸ‘ 28 πŸ” 2 πŸ’¬ 2 πŸ“Œ 1

You say that *now* (I’ll be watching)

13.02.2026 00:32 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

lol i guess they knew what they were doing!

09.02.2026 23:59 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

tell me you don't work in the same office as me without telling me much?

09.02.2026 19:39 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

happy comically small royalty statement from academic publisher season to all who celebrate

09.02.2026 19:38 πŸ‘ 16 πŸ” 1 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

Automatic admit for a PhD in analytic philosophy

07.02.2026 20:51 πŸ‘ 16 πŸ” 1 πŸ’¬ 2 πŸ“Œ 0

Sense making module? You mean reason?

05.02.2026 15:39 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

I don’t even like reading this tweet!

01.02.2026 17:58 πŸ‘ 3 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 2 πŸ“Œ 0

Yes In My Front Bathroom

30.01.2026 02:08 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

The system works.

27.01.2026 18:19 πŸ‘ 5 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

yeah, someone should try smoking

27.01.2026 18:16 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

In a series of unrelated interviews, extended mind theorists from around the world repeatedly claimed to meet at a location they called "the hill"...

27.01.2026 18:15 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

"politics is the art of could've been worse"

25.01.2026 20:28 πŸ‘ 16 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

Powerful new statement on MN from GOP Vermont Governor Phil Scott (1/3):

β€œEnough…it’s not acceptable for American citizens to be killed by federal agents for exercising their God-given and constitutional rights to protest their government. At best, these federal immigration operations ...

25.01.2026 15:41 πŸ‘ 378 πŸ” 113 πŸ’¬ 11 πŸ“Œ 13

Not all middle-aged married men with an active social life are well socialized πŸ™

25.01.2026 15:00 πŸ‘ 11 πŸ” 1 πŸ’¬ 2 πŸ“Œ 0

Seeing this here is like a warm bath.

22.01.2026 18:28 πŸ‘ 3 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0
Preview
Karl Schafer, Realizing Reason in Feeling: Smithian Sympathy as the Schema of the Kantian Moral Law - PhilPapers Smith’s influence on Kant’s philosophy was once viewed as marginal, but it is now well-established that central aspects of Kant’s moral and political philosophy were significantly influenced by his ex...

Here I argue that Smith's conception of sympathy was ideally suited to bridge the gap between reason and sentiment in Kant's moral psychology.

In a slogan: Smithian sympathy gave Kant the key for "schematizing" the moral law on the level of feeling and imagination.

philpapers.org/rec/SCHRRI-7

22.01.2026 15:43 πŸ‘ 4 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

As if Derrida would know unicode

20.01.2026 16:01 πŸ‘ 2 πŸ” 1 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

Oh hell no.

20.01.2026 15:57 πŸ‘ 3 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 2 πŸ“Œ 0

I don’t want to be one of β€œthose guys”, but please don’t talk about my wife like that.

20.01.2026 15:56 πŸ‘ 12 πŸ” 1 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

Interesting resonances in Koselleck here with the Anscombean critique of a focus on "plans" or "intentions" in the philosophy of action.

But also an interesting rejoinder to the common assumption in metaethics that the authority of morality is best established by moral realism (vs. constructivism).

20.01.2026 15:51 πŸ‘ 4 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

"Since the future of modern history opens itself as the unknown, it becomes plannable–indeed it must be planned. And with each new plan a fresh degree of uncertainty is introduced, since it presupposes a lack of experience. The self-proclaimed authority of 'history' grows with its constructibility."

20.01.2026 15:48 πŸ‘ 0 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0

It feels so good to have a couple hazy IPAs, make a few dumb posts, and then quickly delete every last one.

16.01.2026 02:02 πŸ‘ 7 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 2 πŸ“Œ 0