With Callais not out yet & no opinion likely until late March at the earliest, it is becoming functionally too late for most southern states to redraw maps.
By the end of March, primaries will have happened in TX, NC, & MS & mail ballots will go out shortly after in AL, GA, and LA.
04.03.2026 15:54
π 64
π 23
π¬ 4
π 3
Rethinking Preclearance in the Age of Trump #ELB
With Mondayβs shadow docket decision in Malliotakis v. Williams, the Staten Island NYVRA case, the Supreme Court has doubled-down on its resistance to lower courts issuing preliminary injunctions agai...
In a new Election Law Blog, I argue that, in prepping for a post-Trump world, we need to re-think preclearance. Using the mid-decade redistricting fights as an example, the post argues that DOJ should be sidelined and/or courts given power to review preclearance grants.
electionlawblog.org?p=154611
04.03.2026 15:33
π 1
π 2
π¬ 0
π 0
I'll be presenting this paper next week at the National Conference of Constitutional Law Scholars at the University of Arizona Law School. I'll post it on SSRN after incorporating comments from the conference. In the meantime, happy to share if folks are interested.
24.02.2026 20:06
π 2
π 0
π¬ 1
π 0
I've just submitted a new paper out this law review cycle. In Liquidating Reconstruction, I ask what the Reconstruction Amendments can teach us about liquidation and vice versa. This paper is especially timely given that 2027 is the 150th anniversary of the end of Reconstruction.
24.02.2026 20:06
π 9
π 1
π¬ 1
π 1
My book is available for pre-order! Get your copy here: www.cambridge.org/us/universit...
18.02.2026 16:44
π 81
π 29
π¬ 4
π 2
I'd love to workshop chapters of this book in the coming years. And suggestions on title (and subtitle) are appreciated.
Thanks to all my mentors who pushed me to go into legal academia as a First Gen college student. This book would not be possible without your encouragement.
23.01.2026 16:07
π 2
π 0
π¬ 0
π 0
My book will also cover post-1950s doctrinal developments in areas such as Congressβs enforcement authority, redistricting, and Section 2βs discriminatory results standard. Some of this history has yet to be written as we await the Court's decision in Callais.
23.01.2026 16:07
π 2
π 0
π¬ 1
π 0
The last book on the Fifteenth Amendmentβs drafting and ratification was published in 1965. My book covers that history from a legal perspectiveβas opposed to a historianβs. And my book will go beyond 1870, providing a brief history of Reconstructionβs demise and Jim Crow.
23.01.2026 16:07
π 0
π 0
π¬ 1
π 0
I'm thrilled to announce that Iβve signed a contract with Cambridge University Press to write a book on the Fifteenth Amendment. The target publication date is late 2028. The tentative title is "The Fifteenth Amendment: An Unabridged History of the Fight against Racial Discrimination in Voting."
23.01.2026 16:07
π 12
π 0
π¬ 1
π 0
Hot off the presses! I helped organize a symposium on the 150th anniversary of Minor v. Happersett, where the Supreme Court held that women were not enfranchised by the 14th Amendment. The case originated in St. Louis, so it was rewarding to shine a light on this overlooked piece of local history.
17.10.2025 16:08
π 3
π 0
π¬ 1
π 0
If Section 2 compliance isn't a compelling state interest, how would it survive Boerne? Alabama has a jurisdictional statement in Milligan, and they'd argue it isn't congruent/proportional. I don't see much daylight here.
That said, I could see an argument that it could still survive Katzenbach.
17.10.2025 00:48
π 0
π 0
π¬ 1
π 0
Callais Re-Argument Recap #ELB
Earlier today, I attended the oral argument in Callais. My global takeaway is a bit more sanguine than Rickβs. When the case was set for re-argument, the new QP flagged Section 2βs constitutionality: ...
Here's my take on today's big voting rights argument in Louisiana v. Callais. The Justices re-hashed arguments that had been considered three Terms ago in Milligan, and they appeared more interested in tweaking the VRA than in overturning it.
electionlawblog.org?p=152557
15.10.2025 19:44
π 3
π 0
π¬ 0
π 0
In advance of tomorrow's re-argument in the major voting rights case of Louisiana v. Callais, I've got two posts on the Election Law Blog. I'll be attending the argument and will provide an eyewitness account on ELB as well.
14.10.2025 18:37
π 3
π 1
π¬ 2
π 0
Can't wait to read this!
30.09.2025 15:42
π 2
π 0
π¬ 0
π 0
Thanks to @epps.bsky.social and the folks at Wilkinson Stekloff LLP for their help on the brief.
04.09.2025 01:10
π 3
π 0
π¬ 0
π 0
You can find the amicus brief here:
www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/24...
04.09.2025 01:10
π 4
π 1
π¬ 1
π 0
I filed an amicus brief in Callais, this fall's blockbuster voting rights case. I make three arguments. First, the Fifteenth Amendment is the constitutional provision that bans racial discrimination in voting. Second, Shaw should be overturned. Finally, Section 2 of the VRA is constitutional.
04.09.2025 01:10
π 84
π 17
π¬ 2
π 0
To quote the Onion: History sighs, repeats itself.
08.08.2025 20:15
π 1
π 1
π¬ 0
π 0