Timothy Schwarzauer

You shall be remembered fondly.

Occupation of Japan -> river boat mechanic with most of his fingers, but not all of them, still intact.

"you are through here"

Where is "here"?

Qanon nonsense. There is a lot at play psychologically speaking. We don't want to believe that regular people can.commit heinous crimes so we invent "monsters" to explain it away. Then there is qanon need to feel smart and "in" like you figured out some puzzle first

BREAKING: DOJ confirms that 47,635 Epstein files have been removed, per The Independent.

It could be worse, John Fetterman could have chased after me with a gun.

I... Does their display name mean they are an American in Canada?

A frigate with a crew of fewer than 200 is barely a "warship". The vast majority of that crew were cooks, deckhands, engineers to keep the turbines going. And to leave wounded survivors floating in open water violates the actual and moral law of the sea. You at least call for help for them.

I guess surrendered

Results from the NC Senate Republican primary show Sam Page with 13,077 votes and incumbent Phil Berger with 2 fewer at 13,075.

Never let anyone tell you your individual vote couldn’t change an election outcome.

2 votes separate Sheriff Sam Page from NC Senate leader Phil Berger, who gerrymandered for and was endorsed by Trump. All precincts have reported.

Certification will take weeks with a mandatory recount. Wow.

Have you figured out the answers to my questions or have you surrendered?

Citations needed.

Baby steps.

*Taps the sign*

bsky.app/profile/schw...

That's not responsive to the question asked .would you like to try again?

I am still waiting for a responsive answer to the question about what the specific order was that they are alleging was unlawful. We don't even have that information yet.

That doesn't answer the question as to what you are claiming was the precise order given, much less what your citation is for the order.

It does open up more questions about what the specifics are of the process you're attempting to reference and what specific statute you believe is at play.

What is the specific process? And what are you alleging "this" is? Again, please be precise in your citation.

It's an adjective clause, also known as a relative clause, grammatically.

What was the precise order given? Please be specific in your citation.

What is the felony statute?

The clause "claiming they'd rather go to prison (...)" is a descriptor of "the people" being discussed. It is followed up with direct statements about them understanding how prison works.

You inserted several value judgements not present in the statement.

No one has argued that. Again, you appear to be imagining entire screeds not present.

I think you might be confused about the difference between an inference and an implication, sweetie.

You're making inferences based on your own prejudices and inserting words not present in the statement.

That's also not what she said. Again are you being intentionally dishonest or are you functionally illiterate?

I can break it down cause by clause for you if that would help you to stop imagining words not present in the statement.

It helps that demographically it is the most diverse of the branches.

It is quite remarkable the number of people "reading" words not present in the statement.

Alternatively it is just another sock.from one of the chuds that spent the previous few days attacking trans people and now they've moved on to wanting to silence Julie with their disingenuous outrage at her misconstrued comments.

I am open to the possibility that they simply don't understand the concept of a value judgement or that there isn't one in Julie's posts.

Much less a value judgement claiming it is good.

Where did you see a value judgement in the post you focused on?