They tried this with God too
They tried this with God too
But they punch really fast too
THREAD: I got laid off from NYMag/Vulture after 14 years. The family lost 75% of income + medical. Now mzs.press bookstore, once a side project. is do-or-die for Judith & I. I feel weird telling you this because others are doing much worse. But if you could like or share this, we'd be so grateful!
Is this some sort of Turing test for the human susceptibility to logical fallacies?
Prey to disagree
BSA already raped enough children. They should sit out this moral panic.
JD is a snotty, soulless social climber who thinks heβs the smartest guy in the room. EB is a sad-sack chiseler who knows heβs weak, dumb, and cowardly. Both worms, but EB at least has some redeeming moments.
And if someone answered βyesβ?Would that justify a callous, reckless war of choice waged without public backing or legal foundation, to distract from scandal and slake old grievances sown by our own, old, horrific foreign policy? Horrific precedent, regardless of consequences.
It's an American thing to always believe in hope, and that's an admirable thing (tho can the army always save you?). What's most frightening is that there are times where there is no hope. The end trades on not knowing when that is, but I don't think we should judge people for making a bad bet.
Haven't read the novella but that does fit with the film. I just find that kind of moralizing optimism cheap with what the movie built up. Meeting Lovecraftian despair with fake it til you make it just feels wrong. Like telling a suicide in the Holocaust they should've hoped more.
It is, although the end still feels too much like a punchline for me. I don't like stomping on people in justifiable despair.
You just sound evasive and waffling, man. They made one demand. One. And you mischaracterized them as asking all their demands met, and then invoked cliched, nebulous warnings about coalitions. We don't just need a "not MAGA" leading to another hiatus. We need someone to fight MAGA.
You just said this personβs single demand that the candidate fights MAGA was too divisive a way to build a coalition against MAGA. Thatβs all I know.
Your demand is that we give up all demands, even when the only demand here is a candidate that stands reliably against MAGA. Seems like a pretty bad strategy for building coalitions to beat MAGA.
We need someone at the top of the ticket who shows that Democrats are ready to reckon with their own failures here
Anyone but MAGA is better, but weβve run that three times and barely won once, only for him to pave the way for Trump 2 by appointing Garland and running again. There isnβt just a moral, but an instrumental argument here for demanding more from our candidates. Thatβs the baseline? OK. We need more!
Dwarves are a bigoted and stubborn people
Should've been: "What is that? [Throws coffee mug against wall] What is it?"
Call me when he gets out into the streets
As of Jan 1st I will have to drive 30 mins to see No Other Choice rather than 5 mins
Not news
Shot in my city, his hometown.
I'll be hard on you!
She took his peace prize
From putting in Garland as a symbolic AG to waiting so long to "pass the torch" as a severely unpopular incumbent, Biden is the main reason we have Trump 2.0. All of Dearborn, uncommitted, and "AIPAC bad" (a popular position now) couldn't have overcome his sabotage.
Neither could Biden, i.e. the single most responsible person on earth for getting Trump re-elected. But yes, by all means, blame the Muslims again.
Over a half million people have died due to Elonβs USAID cuts
Twin Peaks: The Return
I donβt want her to birth either