Dokumentet er fra Herlev Kommune.
07.02.2026 23:32
👍 0
🔁 0
💬 1
📌 0
Dokumentet er fra Herlev Kommune.
Det er derfor, de anbefaler en fra Brother. Og med laser kan den stå ubrugt i halve år uden problemer, modsat inkjet
Det er en s/h-printer. Helt ol'school
Dyrehaven
Er krisen ovre i Coop? Og hvad er foreningens rolle nu?
Det spørger Finans’ erhvervskommentator Søren Linding forperson i Coop, Pernille Skipper, om, når hun gæster Finans Live fredag morgen.
Læs mere: https://finans.dk/EC...
An excerpt from Roger Fisher’s March 1981 article in the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, titled “Preventing Nuclear War”: “My suggestion was quite simple: Put that needed code number in a little capsule, and then implant that capsule right next to the heart of a volunteer. The volunteer would carry a big, heavy butcher knife as he accompanied the president. If ever the president wanted to fire nuclear weapons, the only way he could do so would be for him, first, with his own hands, to kill one human being. The president says, ‘George, I’m sorry, but tens of millions must die.’ He has to look someone in the eye and realize what death is—what an innocent death is. Blood on the White House carpet. It’s reality brought home. When I suggested this to friends in the Pentagon, they said, ‘My God, that’s terrible. Having to kill someone would distort the president’s judgment. He might never push the button.’”
White House Military Office Coast Guard aide Lt. Commander Woody Lee carrying the President Emergency Satchel (aka the “Football”) while walking next to President Ronald Reagan (who had recently undergone surgery on his left hand), near the White House, January 10, 1989.
In the March 1981 issue of the @bulletinatomic.bsky.social, conflict resolution expert and Harvard Law School professor Roger Fisher described his “quite simple” idea to force US presidents to viscerally confront the lethal consequences of ordering a nuclear attack. books.google.com/books/about/...
En håndfuld insidere med dyb insigt i spiontjenesternes tekniske indretning vurderer, at den kontroversielle Peter Thiels Palantir bliver omdrejningspunktet for PET's kommende masseprofilering af den danske befolkning
radar.dk/artikel/kont...
Ulighed og fattigdom er steget i Danmark til en Gini koefficient på 30,6 og 49.453 fattige børn
Høj ulighed hænger sammen med lav socialmobilitet
Socialmobilitet er vigtig. Patienter m lav socioøkonomisk baggrund behandlet af læger m lav socioøkonomisk baggrund lever længere & bedre.
God 1. maj 💜
Rusland er langt foran os når det kommer til dronekrig og omstillingen til moderne landkrig. Det vil kræve store og hurtige beslutninger, hvis vi skal være klar til en krig mod russerne inden for de næste år. Det skriver jeg og min kollega Emilie Berthelsen i dette indlæg i @altingetdk.bsky.social.
These aren't tariffs. They are a horse's head in the bed of (almost) every world government and business leader.
Tjek den nye udgave af Runway videogenerator. Vi går spændende tider i møde, hvis nyhedsmedier også begynder at lave AI-video til en historie...
Da den øremærkede orlov til fædre blev indført, var et af de store kritikpunkter, at børn ville blive sendt tidligere i institution. Men ny rapport viser, at det ikke er tilfældet. Til gengæld holder særligt faglærte og ufaglærte fædre mere orlov end før 👍 #dkpol #fædrebarsel bm.dk/nyheder/pres...
For more than a year, I devoted myself to answering these questions. I spoke with former employees, reviewed internal Spotify records and company Slack messages, and interviewed and corresponded with numerous musicians. What I uncovered was an elaborate internal program. Spotify, I discovered, not only has partnerships with a web of production companies, which, as one former employee put it, provide Spotify with “music we benefited from financially,” but also a team of employees working to seed these tracks on playlists across the platform. In doing so, they are effectively working to grow the percentage of total streams of music that is cheaper for the platform. The program’s name: Perfect Fit Content (PFC). The PFC program raises troubling prospects for working musicians. Some face the possibility of losing out on crucial income by having their tracks passed over for playlist placement or replaced in favor of PFC; others, who record PFC music themselves, must often give up control of certain royalty rights that, if a track becomes popular, could be highly lucrative. But it also raises worrying questions for all of us who listen to music. It puts forth an image of a future in which—as streaming services push music further into the background, and normalize anonymous, low-cost playlist filler—the relationship between listener and artist might be severed completely.
Outstanding investigation from @lizpelly.bsky.social into how Spotify is relentlessly replacing artist-driven music on its most popular playlists with anonymous Muzak harpers.org/archive/2025...
Hele morgenen har P4 Fyn fortalt om vores artikel, som vi publicerede i går og har arbejdet på længe - uden at citere os. Hvorfor nægter DR at følge de samme regler som alle andre medier er underlagt #dkmedier #dkpol
jyllands-posten.dk/indland/ECE1...
Ovenpå dagens nyhed om, at ingen har budt på havvindmølleparkerne i Nordsøen fortjener det korteste interview i Deadline nogensinde med en ellers meget overbevist klimaminister i Dan Jørgensen altså et gensyn.
#dkpol
