An article titled 'Politics, Science, and the Future of FDA Drug Regulation: FDA's Review of Mifepristone REMS as a Litmus Test' published online January 12, 2025, in JAMA. The article discusses the HHS's study on the safety of mifepristone.
π¬ Editorial: FDAβs approach to regulating #mifepristone reflects a decade of cautious, science-led REMS decisions, with rare political input that has generally reinforced safety barriers.
ja.ma/4px5fWy
12.01.2026 16:45
π 8
π 2
π¬ 0
π 0
JAMA Health Forum presents a viewpoint article: "Gaps in US Psychedelic Policy and How to Close Them" by Caleigh Propes, Katherine Cheung, Matthew D. Eisenberg, et al., published online November 7, 2025.
Viewpoint: Rapid advances in psychedelic research and policy have created a patchwork of laws regulating access, marketing, and payment, leading to confusion, potential safety issues, and disparities in treatment. ja.ma/3Xqcsfu
12.11.2025 14:00
π 0
π 1
π¬ 0
π 0
New article published in
@jamahealthforum.com that examines and critiques 4 aspects of the current pathwork of regulations covering access to psychedelicsββand then provides constructive, sensible, and actionable ways forward for each.
Work led by drug policy expert @caleighpropes.bsky.social
10.11.2025 15:37
π 4
π 2
π¬ 0
π 0
New today in JAMA Health Forum: Our team discusses how to fill policy gaps surrounding the use of psychedelics to treat mental health and substance use conditions, should they be approved by the US Food and Drug Administration.
07.11.2025 21:36
π 4
π 1
π¬ 0
π 1
We'll be at PRIM&R later this week presenting a poster on this work. Stop by and chat if you'll be in Baltimore! (6/6)
03.11.2025 23:47
π 1
π 0
π¬ 0
π 0
We call on IRBs to revise their policies, recognizing the need for special ethical and regulatory protections when conducting research with pregnant people without resorting to language that casts aspersions on their capacity for decision making about research participation. (5/6)
03.11.2025 23:47
π 3
π 0
π¬ 1
π 0
We explored the extent to which IRBs have updated their policies to no longer characterize pregnant people as a "vulnerable" group, consistent with this change. We found that 72.9% of top research institutions in our sample (n=48) still described pregnant people as vulnerable. (4/6)
03.11.2025 23:47
π 1
π 0
π¬ 1
π 0
In the 2018 revisions to the Common Rule, pregnant people were removed from the list of "vulnerable" groups in response to longstanding scholarly critique about the need to recognize their capability to make informed decisions about their participation in research. (3/6)
03.11.2025 23:47
π 2
π 0
π¬ 1
π 0
Pregnant people have long been excluded from clinical trials β which has resulted in a critical evidence gap regarding the safe and effective delivery of their clinical care. This exclusion has also denied pregnant people potential benefits of research, and underrepresented their interests. (2/6)
03.11.2025 23:47
π 2
π 0
π¬ 1
π 0
Overdue: Delayed Revision of Institutional Review Board Policies Characterizing Pregnant Women After the Revised Common Rule | Annals of Internal Medicine
New paper thread π§΅ Out today in Annals of Internal Medicine, Stephanie Morain @bermaninstitute.bsky.social and I discuss the role of IRBs in facilitating appropriate inclusion of pregnant people in clinical research: www.acpjournals.org/doi/10.7326/... (1/6)
03.11.2025 23:47
π 20
π 8
π¬ 2
π 0
2025 ASBH Annual Conference
#ASBH25 - 3:45p PT | IRB Practices in Promoting Inclusion of Pregnant People in Research, Caleigh Propes | B119 asbh25.eventscribe.net/fsPopup.asp?...
24.10.2025 21:59
π 4
π 1
π¬ 0
π 0
Why We Know So Little About Medicines During Pregnancy
Trumpβs attacks on Tylenol come after decades in which many women were excluded from medical studies, which has created uncertainty about which drugs are safe.
"Too often, [Ruth] Faden told me, pregnant women are still viewed as fragile vessels who need to be sequestered from the world. 'We need to protect women through research, not from research,' she said."
01.10.2025 23:30
π 6
π 2
π¬ 1
π 2
"We have come a long way in preventing disease through vaccination, and we must not lose our progress."
This Viewpoint discusses the importance of early and continued vaccine use in the US.
ja.ma/42FLxAn
#MedSky
06.02.2025 16:19
π 38
π 14
π¬ 0
π 4
Sage Journals: Discover world-class research
Subscription and open access journals from Sage, the world's leading independent academic publisher.
Ethical considerations for sharing aggregate results from pragmatic clinical trials - Stephanie R Morain, Abigail Brickler, Joe Ali, Pearl OβRourke, Kayte Spector-Bagdady, Benjamin Wilfond, Vasiliki Rahimzadeh, Caleigh Propes, Kayla Mehl, David Wendler journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/...
26.11.2024 16:04
π 5
π 2
π¬ 0
π 0
American Heart Association Journals
Recurring and Emerging Ethical Issues in Pragmatic Clinical Trials by Caleigh Propes, Pearl O'Rourke, Stephanie Morain | Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10....
19.07.2024 17:01
π 1
π 2
π¬ 0
π 0