I think you seriously UNDERestimate what have already happened. Both houses of the Congress rejected the limits on the war powers of this mad man. He doesn't need anything else. That's why he fired the 'supporting actors' immediately.
@alxfed
AI Dialogue Facilitator Ph.D. in Physics and Mathematics Data Scientist since 1978. Chicago, IL, since 2003, US Citizen. "Πάντων χρημάτων μέτρον ἄνθρωπος, τῶν μὲν ὄντων ὡς ἔστι, τῶν δὲ οὐκ ὄντων ὡς οὐκ ἔστι." In the past Twitter - @alxfed
I think you seriously UNDERestimate what have already happened. Both houses of the Congress rejected the limits on the war powers of this mad man. He doesn't need anything else. That's why he fired the 'supporting actors' immediately.
The 'click' library becomes particularly useful when you begin using 'uvx'.
click.palletsprojects.com/en/stable/
Pew has reached a new low. Ha-ha-ha! 🙂 Amazing.
Big mistake.
The people who can write will control the machines.
I didn't receive a single spam email Today... Have I died?
... or Google in its infinite wisdom and charity has FINALLY used its capabilities to stop the stream of sewage it had been pumping all around the World for two decades?
Little do you know about them...
No kidding.
I'm still waiting for the presentation of a specimen of 'leftist'. They must be hiding... really well. Nazis were (and are) real 'leftists', that I remember, but I have a vague feeling that they are _not_ who you mean when you use this term of the TV propaganda.
The manipulators of this 'market' suck money from another tit.
For the people having problems with their civic duty there is always a: ballotpedia.org
The Western marxists know the late Marx, the developing countries marxists know ONLY the early Marx and have no idea of the quite different late Marx. So, yes, for the sake of 'Historical Materialism' they should be killed out as soon as possible.
The Economist started 'lying around' a long time ago. 🙂
Decades ago!
Nice summary.
None of the above. OpenAI and Altman personally is motivated by money and money alone NOW, Amodei has made a strategic bet on the next administration and wants to stay as far as possible from the impending scandalous involvement of the army in midterm elections. That's what it is.
Thank you for the link.
I am leaving this exciting opportunity to you, my distant adorable friend without a face.
(dreamily) Maybe they all burn each other to the ground at last...?
Ha-ha-ha! 🙂
Santayana called it an 'animal faith' (that the world Today indeed is what it was yesterday, as the animal knows it).
The second lie is in the phrase "selected pool of voters". Who 'selected' them? And how does the procedure of _that_ selection differ from the procedure that we are trying to prove as valid? Just a little bit of clear thinking and logic, dude!
'online' was 32-48k bit per sec, what 'online'? 🙂
The mental fog is thickening around the crowd of 'Effective Altruists'. 🙂
...I don't want to talk about. 🙂
Then you can split that assumption into a sequence or a tree of smaller assumptions, that's what Newton (just as an example) and on and on through the Descartes, Aquinas reasoning about where the knowledge of angels comes from... and down to Einstein and Niels Bohr.
The Eastern death cults...
I meant something much broader. You can prove _anything_ if you make enough assumptions. I am coming from this point that rightfully belongs to Gerhard Gentzen; make this single meta-assumption about the existence of all-powerful "God" who created everything and you have explained... everything.
The _theory_ of "God", called 'religion' is based on a simple meta-assumption that "God" created everything... By the way, the Newtonian 'Laws of Nature' were, according to him, created by "God" too, not much of a difference actually. So, yes, religion is just one big assumption.
Theology was based on assumption, what he is talking about will be based on direct experience.
The Anthropic world view is: let's watch the tv screen where the news reporting (by the crowd of nincompoops) is going on... from inside of OUR IMITATION of "platonic cave".
"British school" of philosophy... definitely! 🙂
Bullshit!
The main lie is in the phrase "...coalesce over time", there is NO and can be NO proof of that.
Pure demagoguery.