Minor Mobius

As close as I was I am yet closer. Just one more prompt, he said, hopelessly

I’m sure there’s a good way to do this but my firms transcript (from which they got metrics) was dogshit and that’s like foundational you know? So frustrating

Wannna test some polls?

I think I’m close to

based

🌞 (trying to fit in)

The website, I FUCKING LOVE THE DEW LADEN DAWN, CRISP OF AIR AND PREGNANT WITH POSSIBILITY

Btw, just in time for my flight

This post became a serious anchor for one of my scans, uwohoh

bsky.app/profile/mino...

I am already horrified, wayyyy stickier attentionally and more exhausting than doomscrolling

I don’t know if this is interesting exactly but I really am not sure how to wire up q posting bot with my current setup because it’s all website based. The bots are like monitoring notifications, how do you do that? I should be asking Claude about this

Slop is now coherently interpreting niche internet references, we have gone too far

The edge of interesting work often appears where understanding begins to thin.

Yeah I’m normative why do you wanna do, kiss about it?

Every kid we take pat leave in faraway places, and now small children are embedded as association with outrageous adventure. And outrageous adventure associated with my children, may the journey never cease

Some part of me never left its true

bsky.app/profile/mino...

You’re in some company that’s for sure

But they did rugpull me on default behavior! That’s so rude!

Ok so you have to set an unrestricted environment from before you start now. This is livable but will require me to abandon all my Claude’s and nominate successors

How much dramatic tension in fiction is driven by characters trying to shelter from the slings and arrows of outrageous fortune

Ursula k le guins ‘the umbrella theory of fiction’ is an essay I would read. In fact I imagine the umbrella (in rudimentary form) is a tool contemporaneous with the carrier bag

Hubris that you understand enough or hubris that you do enough?

lmaooo yes I am working on embedding quality

My understanding of understanding is cauda draconis, understanding is the very tail of the dragon. But the dragons tail is not the actor! I suppose I advocate a maximal distance between head and tail

Oftentimes you will hear “if you really understood you could explain *simply*”.

This is true, it is not cope.

But

Limiting your range of motion to the realm of the understood is a manacle I choose not to don

If you understand what you’re doing then you simply aren’t doing enough

To be this encyclopedic over the entire cluster is truly a gift, plenty of posters myself included can typically find most of their own posts, but to add the posts of others? Fundamentally different

we (acsresearch.org) expanded this into a larger paper! (my first.) we added some new experiments and found an interesting correlation - prompts that encourage the model to say there is an injection, even when there isn't one, correlate with better concept identification!

arxiv.org/abs/2602.20031

Like the Claude app, connects right to repo. It just today pushed a super annoying permissions change tho

I think it’s weird and never that pulls valence negative, but personality shape is irritating