This article feels pretty close to a type of truth-telling about how fire management in south-eastern Australia has been discussed and debated the last few years. For fire scientists and ecologists alike, there is much to pause, digest and reflect on here. onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10....
05.03.2026 01:53
👍 7
🔁 4
💬 0
📌 0
On this day that supports inclusive futures for women and girls in science, let's not forget all the women that were sidelined, ignored, or forced out of science because they:
- had children
- prioritised family/caring
- did science differently
- questioned boundaries & norms
- fought the patriarchy
11.02.2026 09:39
👍 61
🔁 28
💬 5
📌 0
‘We shouldn’t be surprised’: bushfires in Victoria push threatened species to the brink
The impact of fires on wildlife can be ‘catastrophic’, with some plant species feared extinct
Was glad to speak with The Guardian about the impacts of frequent fires on ecosystems, and bang my usual drum about the need for a state level strategy on how we manage the inevitable change that is going to occur to many forest ecosystems. www.theguardian.com/environment/...
30.01.2026 03:58
👍 15
🔁 6
💬 0
📌 0
Looks like you were right, @ianpennaoz.bsky.social!
04.12.2025 22:12
👍 0
🔁 0
💬 1
📌 0
Buried in yesterday's major announcements is that the State's land use assessment council, VEAC, is being wound up. The end of a long journey that began with the outstanding Land Conservation Council. www.weeklytimesnow.com.au/news/victori...
04.12.2025 22:11
👍 1
🔁 2
💬 2
📌 0
Managing public lands requires a new kind of leader
Click on the article title to read more.
great editorial on risk aversion in forest management particularly on proactive fire management vs reactive fire suppression. Equally relevant to southern Australia. esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10....
23.11.2025 21:19
👍 15
🔁 5
💬 0
📌 0
Ending logging in Victoria now would save taxpayers $192m, budget office estimates
The Greens asked officials to calculate the cost of shutting down the native forest timber industry immediately rather than 2030 as planned
Back in 2020 it was estimated by the Parliament Budget Office that an immediate shutdown of the same industry would cost $15 million in the first three years before savings would appear over a decade. Seems to have been an underestimate. www.theguardian.com/environment/...
04.11.2025 21:23
👍 2
🔁 2
💬 0
📌 0
Interesting to see this report reporting that closing the native timber industry in Victoria has cost $1.5 billion (so far). It's good to contrast this to earlier estimates (and it's a gold thing I have a long memory!)
www.weeklytimesnow.com.au/news/victori...
04.11.2025 21:23
👍 2
🔁 1
💬 1
📌 0
a man in a suit and tie says that 's great peacock on the bottom
ALT: a man in a suit and tie says that 's great peacock on the bottom
How I feel about people thinking they are geniuses for putting the word "Great" in front of a generic descriptor of what's in that National Park
20.10.2025 12:00
👍 0
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
‘It’s become a bit meaningless’: why does Australia have so many new Great Walks?
Whether a clever marketing ploy or truly great by nature, these walks are attracting hikers in increasing numbers
Finally someone is looking into the obsession with the word "Great" when it comes to natural assets. Same story for national parks - does my head in that we have a Great Otway, Great Koala, and Great Forest National Park (well that last one doesn't actually exist) www.theguardian.com/travel/2025/...
20.10.2025 11:57
👍 2
🔁 0
💬 2
📌 0
Kirsha Kaechele spoke at the Forestry Australia conference last year and it was a real treat. She brings an insightful outsiders perspective to the otherwise mind numbing forest war debates. www.themercury.com.au/news/opinion...
29.09.2025 02:29
👍 2
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
Ah the grapevine, I'm not a subscriber. Tbh I've seen a lot of wild things said that appear to arise from it, but I may be proven wrong!
26.09.2025 00:13
👍 0
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
My point being, it feels like veacs/LCC role for many decades has been about allocating lands respectively between logging and parks. It's served other purposes but that was a major feature of Grampians, alpine, east Gippsland, box Ironbark, Otways, river red gum assessment etc.
24.09.2025 23:30
👍 0
🔁 0
💬 1
📌 0
Do you have a copy of the Silver report? I'd love to see it. I may be wrong but i didnt think VEAC influenced funding for PV? Beyond that - don't know what will happen. Though, with the end of logging, a lot of the rationale and distinction of national parks and state forests changes, in my opinion.
24.09.2025 23:26
👍 0
🔁 0
💬 1
📌 0
A review in 2021 showed that more tree fern tags from from the Otways in Vic than all of Tasmania. And Victoria collects no fee for tag which means there is no monitoring. Always baffled me where all these ferns come from - plantations as they are harvested? Private land? It's just so much.
21.09.2025 01:11
👍 0
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
Why Tasmanian ferns hundreds of years old are on sale in UK garden centres
Thousands of native tree ferns are harvested from Tasmania's forests for export each year. Some say the trade saves ferns from destruction, while others accuse the industry of greenwashing.
Good to see coverage of tree fern sales. I tend to agree with Prof Baker in this - Tasmania's tree fern sale system seems pretty good, particularly in how it raises fees for tags which then goes to fund monitoring and research. Victoria is another story, though. www.abc.net.au/news/2025-09...
21.09.2025 01:11
👍 4
🔁 0
💬 1
📌 0
True but it's a bigger systemic problem I think. I once got told by a prominent green politician they couldn't publicly ask for more funding for Parks as it would undermine their case for more National Parks. You can imagine how depressed and disillusioned that made me feel!
14.09.2025 22:24
👍 3
🔁 0
💬 1
📌 0
As a former parks staff once said to me - Parks don't acquire new parks, they get saddled with them. It's an odd model when you think about it - more and more expected from an agency that has less and less.
14.09.2025 09:05
👍 2
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
Near my hometown in the Dandenong Ranges NP, I think it took about eight years for a walking bridge to be fixed after some storms. And that was in a high tourism, high visitation park. So maybe 16 years for you?
14.09.2025 09:02
👍 2
🔁 0
💬 1
📌 0
Victoria set to have first new national parks in more than a decade
Conservation groups are celebrating proposed legislation for three new national parks in Victoria but not all bush users are happy.
"Mr Dimopoulos said Parks Victoria had the funding required to maintain the new national parks.
"Parks Victoria are well funded and have all the resources they need," he said."
The same old story: more National Parks, and no new funding to actually manage them.
www.abc.net.au/news/2025-09...
14.09.2025 06:03
👍 11
🔁 2
💬 4
📌 1
"maintaining existing parks" doesn't sound very proactive. Unfortunately I think the focus for many years has been the political sugar hit that comes with announcing new parks, rather than the slightly duller but very important work in funding them and proactively managing existing parks.
11.09.2025 02:21
👍 0
🔁 0
💬 1
📌 0
The Victorian Government is establishing a suite of long promised national parks but quite interesting to see the last paragraph sends a pretty clear message about the prospect for any future parks. www.premier.vic.gov.au/best-bush-op...
10.09.2025 23:29
👍 3
🔁 1
💬 0
📌 1