Wordt je leverancier? 😃
24.04.2025 18:14
👍 0
🔁 0
💬 1
📌 0
Wordt je leverancier? 😃
Is er ook een andere plek dan facebook waar de info te vinden is?
Bedankt! Plaatst alles weer even in perspectief!
4u Storage of zo
Dag Martien, kan je hier maandelijks een aantal varianten op maken met bijvoorbeeld 3-6-9GW batterijen die de pieken afvlakken en dalen opvullen? Zou interessant zijn!
The gas case Let's start with a baseline. We can consider just building a 1 GW gas power plant to deliver our 1 GW baseload. You'll get the very boring result below: 100% gas generation all year round. This solution has a total cost of approximately £76/MWh. Remember that number as we'll refer to this later as benchmark. Note that only £8/MWh is for paying off the capex, and the other £68/MWh goes into running costs — predominantly the cost of buying gas. The latter we will try to reduce by adding in renewables now.
This is a great piece by @daanwalt3r.bsky.social, which makes much more elegantly a point I often repeat: having gas plants on standby is just not very expensive. And you can save money by not using the gas plants most of the time.
electrotechrevolution.substack.com/p/renewables...
😂
It’s a Belgian Audi plant I think
The image is a black-and-white political cartoon depicting a man in a suit standing behind a counter labeled "Republican Platform." He is holding a bottle labeled "Untaxed Whiskey, 20¢ Gal." in one hand and a piece of cloth labeled "War-Taxed Common Cloth, Tariff 84%" in the other. Above the counter, a sign reads, "If you don’t see what you want, ask for it." The cartoon, signed by W.A. Rogers, appears to satirize the Republican Party's economic policies, highlighting the disparity in taxation between luxury items like whiskey and essential goods like cloth.
In 1890, the Tariff Act came into place in the United States. It placed tariffs on imports of up to 50%.
While touted as a way to build American industry, there was also the hope it would force an annexation of Canada. It backfired.
Let's learn more.
🧵1/10
Negatieve prijzen zijn hier en zullen blijven. Sturing van verbruik en injectie moeten standaard worden.
Waarom voor een hybride gekozen met zo’n lage warmtevraag?
Heel interessant! Enkel WP, geen hybride?
Typo
True, but solar will probably keep growing. This means nukes will also be useless most of the time in the other 9 months, no?
De CfD modellen ben ik iets bekender mee 😉
Bedankt, Bram. Weet je toevallig een goede paper hierover?
Ik probeer, maar ik zie het niet. Je beschermt iedereen tegen de hogere prijs, dan kan je evengoed de incentive er niet insteken. Wat zie ik verkeerd?
Als de netgebruikers tegen de hogere prijs beschermd worden is er toch geen incentive in de LMP?
Go go Baltics!
Exactly
We knew this, but it’s amazing to see it so clearly in this Norwegian data:
1: distance traveled by fuel; EVs (blue) are a sizeable chunk in 2023
2: energy use by fuel; EVs (yellow) are a barely noticeable sliver in 2023
Electrification doesn’t just shift, it massively reduces energy consumption.
Is there an 'energy' feed here that's interesting to follow?
