There is a larger interest in the tendency to misrecognise ancient Israel as a nation state, and the hermeneutical tangle that results from the Bibles complex role in giving rise to the modern world.
There is a larger interest in the tendency to misrecognise ancient Israel as a nation state, and the hermeneutical tangle that results from the Bibles complex role in giving rise to the modern world.
Hope that helps to clarify.
What we see in the early modern period is an appropriation of a biblical heritage mediated and transformed through maps in a different political context of nascent nation states.
“The sovereign outlines the boundaries of the territory he bestows on his vassal, subject to the vassal’s pledge of loyalty and commitment to the clauses of the treaty binding him. This is the literary and cultural context of the biblical border descriptions of the Promised Land”.
So also Num 34 as rightly observed by Nili Wazana in her outstanding monograph, All the Boundaries of the Land, p. 127-128.
Delineated borders are occasionally found in the ancient Near Eastern world though nearly always an imposition of a suzerain on vassals.
The interpretive challenge is that even texts like Num 34 need to be read in their ancient political context, and our own assumptions make that quite difficult.
Very little is not the same as nothing. Indeed, in my discussion of the interpretation of Gen 10 I noted that the boundaries of Canaan (and only
Canaan) were defined in the biblical text.
There is, of course, a larger story to be told here and I gave only a part of it.
Saul, I’m not saying what you think I’m saying. So even the last sentence of the article reads “A text that says very little about geographical boundaries gradually became a paradigmatic instance of God’s ordering of the world according to nation states”.
And some coverage at the Daily Mail online.
www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/...
Here’s a piece at the Conversation
theconversation.com/how-the-firs...
There’s a university press release here. It makes more of it being the 500th anniversary of a map appearing in a Bible.
www.cam.ac.uk/stories/firs...
If you are interested in thinking about borders and the Bible, here’s a new article.
It traces a complex history between the Bible and the borders of modern nation states. So it’s relevant to the challenge of Christian nationalism.
It’s also open access so take a look.
doi.org/10.1093/jts/...
Congratulations @andrewtimkeenan.bsky.social
I recently did an interview on the book of Genesis with Jon at the History Sessions podcast. The link is here if you’re interested and worth subscribing to Jon’s show
eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com?url=https%3A...
Wonderful! Congratulations!
Extract from Mark Brett, Debating the Nation I have heard it said in jest that the idea of an ecumenical Abraham was invented by genial Swiss scholars who see the biblical ancestor in their own image.
Reminder to self: your casual asides responding to questions at an online conference with 300 scholars on the line can come back to haunt you.
Some of the Hittite examples Wazana discusses.
So…looking forward to SBL in a week’s time and just wondering how many attendees are going to take up the special conference offer of a 10% discount on a midweek wedding while we’re in San Diego.
The lack of an OT book full of recipes is a definite oversight. Luckily we have some Babylonian recipes: www.npr.org/sections/the...
Yes me too. Looks very exciting.
Exciting opportunity of a permanent post in Second Temple Judaism at Cambridge.
www.jobs.cam.ac.uk/job/43152/
Look what came in the post today!