Divisional Court grants Home Secretary’s app for permission to appeal and suspends its quashing of proscription of Palestine Action pending determination of the appeal.
Claimant’s app for permission to cross-appeal refused.
The proscription Order remains in force.
www.judiciary.uk/judgments/hu...
High Court’s judgment finding the proscription of Palestine Action was an unjustified interference with rights to freedom of association and assembly under arts 10/11 ECHR, and inconsistent with the Home Secretary’s own policy.
www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/u...
The High Court will hand down judgment tomorrow in the judicial review against the Home Secretary’s proscription of Palestine Action.
Congratulations @alasdairmackenzie.bsky.social, massively well-deserved!
"There appears to have been no reference to section 20C of the Juries Act 1974, and therefore no attempt to explain how Mrs Warner’s behaviour could be described as lawful, given the possibility that it constituted a criminal offence."
A highly sceptical Court of Appeal decision on the origins and consequences of the principle of jury equity and Saini J's decision in the Trudi Warner case.
caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewca/crim/20...
Very severe criticisms by Collins Rice J of the SDT’s reasoning, including that it was “replete with risk of unfairness”, reached adverse conclusions which are not “adequately comprehensible”, and its “vehemence and disparagement” against Mr Hurst being “troubling”.
The High Court has set aside the Solicitors’ Disciplinary Tribunal’s determination against Ashley Hurst, relating to correspondence sent to Dan Needle for Nadhim Zahawi, for insufficient analysis/reasoning, legal misdirection, and unfairness.
caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewhc/admin/2...
Lord Reed has announced his intention to retire from the Supreme Court on 10 January 2027.
www.supremecourt.uk/news/lord-re...
The IPT has dismissed complaints made by two Guantanamo Bay detainees alleging public law illegality by UK security agencies in their ill-treatment by the US: www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/u...
The substantive findings/reasons for dismissing all substantive grounds are contained in a CLOSED judgment.
... obligations or if the UK withdrew from those treaties. The significance of the issue is that a state is bound by a norm of CIL in the absence of treaty obligations. It is not inconceivable that we, or some other national court, could at some point be called upon to determine that question.”
On whether non-refoulement is rule of CIL, and UKSC's consideration in Rwanda case:
“In the context of that appeal, we did not have to determine whether the principle amounts to a rule of customary international law.. It would have been highly relevant if there were not a number of binding treaty..
Lord Sales, "The UK Supreme Court’s approach to customary international law" (Presentation to ECtHR Judges)
supremecourt.uk/uploads/spee...
Good post from @finishedloading.bsky.social. An assertion by a public authority of compliance with unincorporated international law can't per se incorporate that law so as to give rise to enforceable + interpretable obligations in domestic law. To do otherwise might turn the clock back to 1688.
There were back to back interim relief hearings (application + appeal) in the Palestine Action case yesterday. Here, @finishedloading.bsky.social breaks down the judgments of the EWHC and EWCA denying interim relief against proscription to Palestine Action.
Two recent blogs from the @admincourtblog.bsky.social team on the VAT exemption case:
Part I on Pepper v Hart by @anuragdeb.bsky.social is here: administrativecourtblog.wordpress.com/2025/06/19/a...
Part II on the ECHR dimension by me is here: administrativecourtblog.wordpress.com/2025/06/23/a...
I'm a fan of pepper in my food, but not Pepper in my case law*
Here, I use the private schools VAT JR to explain why.
*The slander of terrible jokes will not be tolerated.
CA has listed a hearing on 26 June for Liberty’s appeal against the HC’s refusal of permission to challenge the length of the EHRC’s Code of Practice consultation, 4 days before the consultation is to end.
@samuelwillis.bsky.social and I blogged below on the HC’s reasons for refusing permission.
The AG is creating a new Senior Treasury Counsel (Civil) Group, which "sits alongside proposed changes to the role of First Treasury Counsel, principally by relaxing the current requirement that the postholder undertakes work exclusively for government."
www.gov.uk/government/n...
It was a pleasure to reflect candidly on the role (both good and bad) social media use played in my pupillage application journey!
Anurag was one of the first legal SM contacts I interacted and then met with in person, so here’s a picture from our ALBA moot participation 3 years ago to reminisce!
Thank you, it's been a long old slog!
I am very pleased to have accepted an offer of traineeship at Matrix Chambers, commencing in October 2026.
I can't wait to get started working on the cutting-edge legal issues raised across Chambers' immense expertise in a range of practice areas.
Court of Appeal will hand down judgment in SSHD’s appeal against High Court’s judgment upholding Liberty’s serious disruption regulations judicial review this Friday.
… have to depend on submissions by advocates nor should it have to piece together a number of different documents in order to understand what happened.”
Singh LJ on D’s duty of candour in JR: “The Court should (in proper evidence, i.e. in a witness statement) be given a full, accurate and clear explanation of the decision-making process used by the public authority concerned and should not…
assets.caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ewca/civ/202...
The JCPC (Reed judgment) affirms that the duty of candour in JR applies at permission stage ([91]) and non-compliance with the duty ([93]) can be a factor in favour of granting permission.
caselaw.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ukpc/2025/14
This is a nowadays rare example of the UKSC applying the principle of interpretation that "courts should seek to interpret domestic law in a way that is compatible with the United Kingdom’s international treaty obligations" to find in favour of a C's construction of statute (here, the BNA 1981).
"[89]: In the present case we consider that this approach to interpretation... calls for consideration and protection of E3’s individual rights according to the principle of legality and under the Statelessness Convention... in so far as that does not compromise the statutory purpose."
"[88]: The legal effect of a failure to comply with a condition for the exercise of a power conferred by a statute, where that is not spelled out expressly, depends upon an inference as to Parliament’s intention as to what that effect should be..."
UKSC allows Cs' appeals in N3/ZA, holding that, where the SSHD withdraws citizenship deprivation decisions, the decisions are to be treated as having no effect for determining one's citizenship status in the period from the date of the order until it is withdrawn. www.supremecourt.uk/cases/uksc-2...
