Congratulations Dan!!! Very proud supervisor moment
@timothyjgraham
Associate Professor at Queensland University of Technology. Computational communication, social theory. Interests: Propaganda, dark political communication, the relationship between technology, truth, and knowledge
Congratulations Dan!!! Very proud supervisor moment
Super thrilled to have completed my final seminar today and to be told that Iβm almost ready to lodge my thesis for examination :β) huge thanks to my supervisors @timothyjgraham.bsky.social @petamitchell.bsky.social and Benjamin Nicoll for their help over the past three years
Thanks. My point is: focus on the substantive findings of the Nature paper, which is the focus of the article. Whether Moses was racist or not is beyond the point. Infrastructure embeds politics - this we know. If social media is infrastructure, then we ought to understand how it is political.
Thanks Tilman - fair point. But it is contested and not βlargely debunkedβ - I kindly suggest to read beyond the first google result. Itβs an illustrative example, at any rate. The Nature paper and my empirical research provide the core evidence. Along with a growing body of research.
Do it! That old traditional roguelike Iβve been working on since before Covid finally has a build almost ready. Itβs super CoQ inspired! If youβre interested Iβll send a link - Iβll pop it on itch soon
Really interesting new paper from some of my former @gesis.org colleagues in @bigdatasoc.bsky.social: "From (almost) open to heavily restricted data access β The development of the Twitter/X developer policies"
doi.org/10.1177/2053...
#commsky #computationalsocialscience
π€£ so erudite that I actually replied in a civil, rational, Habermas-idealist, Plato-approved way
Congrats Caroline!
Aaaand here comes the fan mail
Latest article from me in The Conversation this morning.
I discuss a new Nature study that finds X's algorithmic feed is politically biased (surprise, surprise!). I explore the idea of social media platforms as faulty infrastructure in need of a fix.
theconversation.com/a-few-weeks-...
tweet by Catherine na Nollag (@cafernblue): "i still think my favourite thing that's ever happened to me on the internet is the time a guy said 'people change their minds when you show them facts' and I said 'actually studies show that's not true' and linked TWO sources and he said 'yeah well I still think it works'"
unfortunately evergreen
π¨π¨π¨The Berlin Court of Appeal ruled today that @democracyreporting.bsky.social (DRI) is entitled to publicly available data from X to conduct research on election interference and disinformation on X in connection with the elections in Hungary π³οΈ ππΊ
democracy-reporting.org/en/office/EU...
Iβm just shocked at how active it is. I hadnβt logged in more than 3 times in the past decade. I go back on and suddenly itβs like thereβs a block party 24/7. So many academics are partying hard over there. I had no idea
Canβt stop progress
Tim. No. Just no.
π stay pure
I have logged in more times in a week than I have in 11 years
Mugatu meme: LinkedIn So hot right now
Academics in 2026
Thatβs true. I mean, there probably is, but I want to stay curmudgeonly in my online form approach
New book now coming out very soon. Next month!
One does not simply submit an online form without first copying the entire contents to the clipboard
often the best approach - bye bugs
On the Internet no one knows youβre not a bot: βBottingβ on Reddit as participatory culture. A new paper by Dominique Carlon and myself
Why was Reddit overrun with accounts named β__-anusβ__fungi_β, spamming π emojis?
And what does this have to tell us about the difference between bots and humans? And whether the distinction even matters?
New paper out today! With @domcarlon.bsky.social
journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10....
Thank you Dan!
We gotta come up with a better system than βeverything rests on whether these twelve billionnaires are niceβ
There are several major platforms that in my opinion are unsafe for everyone, not just children. I'm not saying ban all social media. But the "product" is clearly harmful in multiple, complex, and longitudinal ways.
Thanks Gaurav for sharing this. Social media is complicated and ideally we would have pro-social, safely designed spaces. But we don't, and we almost certainly won't given current trajectory. So we must weigh the pros and cons - scales are tipped towards banning for most parents
Excellent research out of Monash, led by @markandrejevic.bsky.social.
79% of adults (n=1,598) surveyed support the governmentβs under-16 social media ban
www.monash.edu/news/article...
Good question - the reviewers thought so