Enrollment form strikes again. (OpenReview -> Tasks -> ECCV -> Author Enrollment Form)
26.02.2026 19:26
👍 4
🔁 0
💬 1
📌 0
Enrollment form strikes again. (OpenReview -> Tasks -> ECCV -> Author Enrollment Form)
I hate the ECCV template so much. Why can't it just die? Nobody prints proceedings into LNCS volumes anymore.
My favorite templates:
1. IEEE/CVPR
2. NeurIPS
...
...
39,2312,321. Edging tikz commands in morse code onto the skin of a dead walrus
...
...
Springer/ECCV
Are they public? Can't find any openaccess.thecvf.com/content/CVPR...
I think making the reviews and discussions public, at least for accepted papers, would be a good first step.
Sounds like a good approach!
If the reviewers were interested in the papers, they would be interested in discussing them. This is the main problem in my opinion. :)
Pretty similar to how the discussion phase at ICLR played out. Maybe 1/4 reviewers actually do their job.
I'm reviewing four papers. Three of them have a rebuttal. I wrote down my thoughts regarding the rebuttal for each. Across the three papers, one single (out of six) other reviewer has responded to the rebuttal.
What if position encodings were designed for vision from scratch? We introduce PaPE—Parabolic Position Encoding. Outperforms RoPE on 7/8 datasets and extrapolates to higher resolutions without fine-tuning or position interpolation. Paper, code, and website in thread 🧵
Our recent work looking into the desgining flexible approximately equivariant NNs. arxiv.org/abs/2602.02853 This is w/ Stefanos Pertigkiozoglou (stefanospert.github.io), Mircea Petrache, Kostas Daniilidis. Builds upon our work from the 2024 edition of NeurIPS proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/...
The #ECCV2026 Malmo 🇸🇪 call for papers is now available. Check it out!
Call for Papers: eccv.ecva.net/Conferences/...
Looking forward to seeing the submission counts at ECCV and NeurIPS.
A chance to join us as postdoc in Gothenburg to workon this :) www.chalmers.se/en/about-cha...
Funny failure mode
Why you should probe more than just the final layer of your Vision Transformer to maximize performance. 🧵👇
Something @eugenevinitsky.bsky.social and I are very curious about... how can we make our client (a version of Bluesky for researchers) more friendly to grad students? What would encourage you all to post more?
Guess who wrote those submissions 🤐
Another Erdos problem this morning:
(just to respond to a few people-- the system does NOT work by trying every possible answer and then checking. There's not enough matter and energy in the universe to solve theorems by trying every possible combination of symbols or whatever)
Fun! Some meshuggah/opeth/etc have a similar disorienting feeling but I am not sure if they are ever explicit twelve-tone.
More rock riffs should be twelve-tone tbh
Power chords are even cooler in 5-part choir harmonization of a twelve tone row (from 2:17 open.spotify.com/track/7uezPJ... )
I liked the formulation "negative impact" here "Per the conference policy, reviewers who fail to complete their reviews risk having their submissions rejected. To avoid this negative impact on your submission, encourage your co-author(s) to submit their reviews"
Reviewing for CVPR is sadly very boring.
New blog post (on a shiny new ICML blog!): What's New in #ICML2026 Peer Review
Some highlights:
- Policies to combat thinly sliced contributions
- Cascading desk rejections for peer-review abuse
- Reviewer reciprocity
- New ways to support authors and reviewers
Post: blog.icml.cc/2026/01/08/w...
so what do you think ChatGPT will say when ten million people ask it who they should vote for next year
I'd like to propose the following norm for peer review of papers. If a paper shows clear signs of LLM-generated errors that were not detected by the author, the paper should be immediately rejected. My reasoning: 1/ #ResearchIntegrity
every claim that "the incentives" support or deter certain kinds of behavior is also a statement about what kinds of external signals the claimant views as rewards or penalties #linklog
On the unexplained similarity across networks
In behavior, order and weights, we keep seeing evidence that learning is more consistent than one might think.
A walk through occurrences, my thoughts and the open question, why?!
What's your hypothesis, missed papers and thoughts
🤖📈🧠 #AI
📢The second edition of ✨GRaM workshop✨ is here this time at #ICLR26.
🌟Submit your exciting works in Geometry-grounded representations.
We welcome submissions in multiple tracks i.e.
📄 Proceedings
📝extended abstract
👩🏫Tutorial/blogpost
as well as an exciting challenge!
