The cycle of inequality in education.
#SocialClass
@gerardelwood
PhD research @DCU IoE | Politics & Society: Teaching-Praxis, Influences & Student Agency. Teacher (Politics & Society, History, Philosophy & Citizenship). Lecturer (Teacher Education). Views my own. ๐Ireland
The cycle of inequality in education.
#SocialClass
The Book of Kells is one of the most spectacular illuminated manuscripts ever made โ 800 AD, Irish monks, intricate knotwork, hidden animals...Woo Kids Activities has a lovely kid-focused activity for making your own illuminated initials.
#StPatricksDay #KidsActivites #KidsCrafts #ArtEd #Edusky
Although politicians in the North are often criticised, Nick Mathison MLA, Chair of the NI Assembly Education Committee, stands out for his support of young people and his contribution to improving education through cross-party commitee scrutiny. #5NN #Belfast #CitizenshipEd
Lovely to be home as Belfast hosts this year's #5NN Annual Conference
Are you starting a new social media research project? Check out our free Social Media Research Toolkit, a curated collection of 50+ tools. socialmedialab.ca/apps/social-... #academicsky #PolCom #PhDSky #ComSky #CommSky
Reclaiming the ๐ฎ๐ช from those who tarnish it through their hatred, racism and xenophobia starts in schools.
The 12th Annual Thomas F. Meagher educational campaign on the history of the Irish Tricolour launched.
#IrishHistory
www.rte.ie/news/ireland...
Did you use devices in school?
The subject of the article is actually drawing upon decades of international evidence.
Happy to read your evidence about it being 'great' in Scotland.
Horvath is proโlearning rather than antiโtechnology and his argument here is grounded in decades of evidence, drawing on international assessments, metaโanalysis and cognitive science.
Read Julian Girdham's insightful review of the The Digital Delusion here:
www.juliangirdham.com/blog/the-dig...
Read Julian Girdham's insightful review of the The Digital Delusion here: www.juliangirdham.com/blog/the-dig...
The key to effective project-based learning? Getting out of studentsโ way. ๐
But that requires a strong system. In his first article for Edutopia, teacher Matt Halter explains how to build PBL systems that *really* encourage students to lead.
#PBL #EduSky
"How have they managed to shoot themselves in the foot?" asks @aine-lawlor.bsky.social.
รine asks this to our political staff Sandra Hurley, in relation to the issue of the recent criteria change for SNAs in Irish schools nationwide.
#SNA
Bowling alleys are the reason we have a problem with student accommodation.
Who knew?
@aine-lawlor.bsky.social getting to the heart of the matter.
PROGRAMME DROP TOMORROW AND IT IS *IMMENSE* ๐ฅ #rEDBRUM @bethgg.bsky.social @isaacmoore7.bsky.social @jonhutchinson.bsky.social @bennewmark.bsky.social @tombennett71.bsky.social @claresealy.bsky.social @didau.bsky.social
FEW TIX LEFT HERE FOR 28TH FEB: www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/researched...
Horvath is proโlearning rather than antiโtechnology and his argument here is grounded in decades of evidence, drawing on international assessments, metaโanalysis and cognitive science.
I messaged you, Stephen.
You are entitled to your views.
Have a good one, too.
Cognitive science supports this, too.
Sadly, I have witnessed it. They are using most of the tools available in school Google Workspace school accounts on tablets and Chromebooks.
I mean teachers sometimes resort to using them as the main teaching and learning resource in the classroom.
Furthermore, the shift from handwriting to typing for note-taking bypasses critical neurobiological pathways; manual writing requires a graphic gesture that creates unique sensorimotor memory traces in the brain, facilitating deeper information encoding and superior recall.
They're also used as a learning aid.
This decline is primarily driven by the increased cognitive load of digital navigation, such as scrolling, which lacks the stable spatial anchoring and mental mapping provided by three-dimensional books.
The transition from physical textbooks to digital screens often results in a screen inferiority effect, characterised by lower reading comprehension and retention compared to print materials.
The article signposts the evidence used to support the claims. It also speaks about education technology in general, not just Chromebooks.
I don't believe causation was the claim in the article itself. Hovrath speaks about 'correlation in scores and time spent on computers in school, such that more screen time was related to worse scores.'
How much proof do you think is required to claim education tools should be used to align with the science of learning?
There is more than one study referenced in the article, there are signposts to decades of neuroscience and education research and books in the article.
Perhaps you can signpost to counter evidence to help inform the conclusions drawn from decades of work.
As mentioned in the piece, 'it is a question of aligning educational tools with how human learning actually works, I would suggest tech + non-digital text.
I shared the study/report.
I'll happily read and share your study (or any other) that robustly challenges this.
I didn't write a headline. I shared the title of the article & a quote from the report.
How much proof is required to claim ed tools should be used to align with the science of learning?