@annmlipton
Law prof at U Colorado, business and securities. Blogging at https://www.businesslawprofessors.com/ Scholarship at https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/cf_dev/AbsByAuth.cfm?per_id=2365170 No longer welcome in the State of Nevada.
I finally got Zoom's "AI Companion" to tell me how to disable it.
There's no option in the phone or desktop app, you have to go to your account on the Zoom website.
Asking an LLM to provide step by step instructions on how to disable the LLM is one of only a few legitimate use cases.
Can't make this shit up
Oh nice the thing I worry about every single time I walk across a city grate happened.
Wordle 1,721 6/6*
⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜
⬜⬜⬜🟨⬜
⬜🟩⬜⬜🟩
⬜🟩🟩⬜🟩
⬜🟩🟩🟩🟩
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
Weather app, are you...okay?
i am absolutely losing my mind. time is a flat circle
www.law360.com/securities/a...
"We ask that the leaders of the business world in the US--some of whom it has been our privilege to teach--speak out now, act now, in defense of democracy....[T]here is no conflict between their responsibilities as CEO and their responsibilities as citizens. The cost of silence is incalculable."
Actually asking: Does 122(18) apply to deal protections?
www.businesslawprofessors.com/2026/03/whit...
Did they sing "nah nah nah nah hey hey hey"?
www.nytimes.com/2026/03/05/u...
i like that better than "people will die" i suppose
www.reuters.com/business/ene...
i assume the court could pause the trial for discovery and then resume, now that musk revived the defense. i certainly don't think that's impossible
this is what the ny plaintiffs had to file:
bsky.app/profile/annm...
i suppose if/when musk does the same thing in ny - testifies as to what counsel told him after explicitly disclaiming the defense - plaintiffs there will point to this case and say "this is a strategy, don't reward him, curative instruction is not enough"
yes that's what it is.
musk's team disclaimed reliance on counsel defense to maintain privilege. on the stand, musk said this is what counsel told him. now court is planning a curative order which won't cure anything
that's definitely what happened in the ny case, and may have happened here as well. then musk on the stand started talking about what counsel advised him - despite previously waiving the defense - which is what created the problem
i don't have access to the transcripts, maybe there was something in the courtroom, but i hope plaintiffs preserved their right to appeal on these grounds
incidentally, in the other musk/twitter fraud case - the one pending in NY - musk is trying to pull the same shtick
ie., i'd insist on discovery into counsel's advice, etc etc
if i were the plaintiff i'd insist that musk waived privilege and object to the instruction but that's me
not ... not me though
um
this cat cave sat in the bedroom entirely unused - the cats prefer to sleep on the bed - and then i moved it into my office space (which has multiple cat trees) and now they fight over it.
i mean, not fight exactly, more like take turns w/ some bullying to get one out
(this is the bully)
The very existence of commercially available glasses with Internet-connected cameras sold by Meta, a company built entirely on hiding the costs of services in negative privacy externalities, is an indictment of U.S. tech law and policy. This is an unfixable product from a fundamentally bad company.
in nyc? yeah
Sometimes you learn things when you do an interview with a chief executive. And sometimes, you learn things when you do not in fact do an interview with a chief executive:
on bluesky?
If you're at the airport and Kristi Noem is doing the ominous little message from the TSA screens, you no longer have to do anything she says. Leave your laptop in the case, whatever.
