Thanks! I've only been to Unplugged and I'm trying to figure out where to find people ❤️
Thanks! I've only been to Unplugged and I'm trying to figure out where to find people ❤️
Hi!!! The meet-up Friday night sounds incredibly cool. Is this a situation where "gaming" primarily means video games? Or is it likely to include TTRPG folks?
(I'm sure it's welcoming to all! But in terms of the event's focus/likely attendees.)
I suppose somebody could call us that, but I've never once heard it and I've been a season ticket holder for two years.
We've got the Pizza Rats and now The Echo, I can ask Jim and Trish if they've heard it.
These ghouls act like they've discovered some novel secret: "Hey, guys, GUYS! Did you know that we can just kill people whenever we want?" Yes, you absolute idiot, that's ALWAYS been true. We just chose not to, for good and self-interested reasons which the entire world is about to learn yet again.
(FWIW I went down a rabbit hole on this and I think it was just the one guard who tried to disguise himself. But he was...a particularly evil one, and yeah he got his ass beat to death by his former victims.)
Give him the ol' Talarico, that'll teach him!
Wow, I did not that. Seems like that's been true since 1990! I wonder if it's been enforced or if those designs are common flash anyway.
Maybe he'll keep fixing it! It's round now, so maybe the next tattoo will be an octopus wrapping its arms around the world. One with a big funny nose...
I was 2nd row behind goal and watched someone deliberately punch Kalty in the face (mask) yet somehow Kalty was the only one in the box for that brawl.
Do we have word on how O'Brien's doing?
don't worry about it man
If you can't be bothered, here are some round-ups. But I'm sure you still won't be bothered. You seem to be commenting along one strange...not particularly relevant theme.
azmirror.com/2026/03/02/g...
www.reddit.com/r/thedavidpa...
dude do you...not know about that? like are you disputing that it's a thing?
Plus...do I believe you that Mills said that? idk. I've seen you quote one person and it was not accurate. Links or GTFO.
It's WILD that you'd post this as though it's a flex.
YOU'RE BOTH AT 44% GRAHAM.
What is this supposed to mean? Where's the other 4% if it's you on the ballot? Are you saying there's a third candidate who's fine with Mills but hates you?
Also the general is in 9 months, chill out it's 4%.
MILLS. Why is nobody talking about Janet "See You In Court" Mills???
wait but what about how he was just on that antisemitic conspiracy theory podcast, that he said he was a longtime fan of, and also he enthusiastically retweeted a Neo-Nazi? wouldn't you say that bodes ill for who might influence him in the Senate? much like Collins?
[citation needed]
It's just...why SENATOR? If people like that this guy's not really good at stuff, but he's got a beard and he says "billionaires are bad, pass me a brewski," can't he say that in Maine? How will that help anyone in DC--including him?? Won't he miss his oysters??
I think the answer is that 1) some libs/lefties adore the idea of a scruffy populist wooing the yokels, cuz they want to believe most Republican voters just *never heard it put that way before* and 2) people hate experienced women. Just, absolutely hate.
And if you're gonna make an anti-establishment, lesser-of-two-evils argument for *Senate,* at least say how that might WORK, right? How the other option is a greater evil, right? Cuz Mills seems pretty ballsy, and the job here is pretty specific.
Folks are in love with useless tiktok clips.
And in what way is Janet Mills the greater evil?? She's the one who told Trump *to his face* that she'd see him in court rather than throw trans kids under the bus. Is that not the hero we want in the Senate???
Thank god the Secretary of State was there.
Whoops I almost just confused this with a politics thread.
And people don't change their minds based on the rationality of the arguments. People don't want to change their minds at all--it actually makes our brains feel bad.
Not your fault! Just genuinely not sure if I was doing it wrong.
Like the interviewer even prefaced the question with that: that Mills had the backbone to stand up to Trump on this, and that some people think that's hurting her in the polls. If Platner were *actually* addressing that, wouldn't it stop hurting Mills in the polls?
How did we get here? Slate *pulls* a hypothetical answer out of him--he shows no actual interest in the topic--and people call him the only Dem with backbone. Meanwhile Mills, his opponent, told Trump TO HIS FACE that she'd see him in court over trans rights.
How do mediocre men cast such a spell.
Which level of backbone, exactly? I can't tell if he's ever actually said this to anyone, whereas his primary opponent told Trump *to his face* that she'd see him in court rather than throws trans kids under the bus.
(or you could just tell me if you've posted about Platner recently)