Mike Salamone's Avatar

Mike Salamone

@enomalas

Political Science professor at Washington State University (@wsupppa.bsky.social). Spouse to a super genius. Parent/servant to two t(w)eens and two dogs. he/him/his

227
Followers
192
Following
71
Posts
24.07.2023
Joined
Posts Following

Latest posts by Mike Salamone @enomalas

Post image

I survived another @apsa.bsky.social conference.

14.09.2025 23:50 πŸ‘ 2 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

I know these β€œinterviews” with Justice Barrett are carefully scripted. But if she’s going to keeping urging Americans to β€œread the opinions,” and not just commentary, it sure would be nice if someone would ask her what we should do whenβ€”as is so often the case these daysβ€”there’s no opinion to read…

12.09.2025 22:57 πŸ‘ 11678 πŸ” 2449 πŸ’¬ 238 πŸ“Œ 113

1. We do not know the motive of the shooter. The man who shot at Trump was after attention.
2. The man who murdered MN legislators WAS motivated by politics, and I didn’t hear any Dems calling for reprisals against all Repubs.
3. It’s easy to start a cycle of violence. Not easy to end one.

10.09.2025 23:23 πŸ‘ 1513 πŸ” 408 πŸ’¬ 39 πŸ“Œ 9
2025 Political Psychology Pre-Conference - Vancouver, Canada Join us at Simon Fraser in Vancouver for the 2025 Political Psychology Pre-Conference on the Comparative Psychology of Authoritarianism.

APSA-bound #polisky: register for the Pol. Psych Pre-Conf by Friday (8/15)!

Featuring @lilymasonphd.bsky.social, @valentimvicente.bsky.social , @mjcohen.bsky.social, @agtheodoridis.bsky.social, S. Feldman, M. Pickup, L. Stephenson, T. Ollerenshaw, & O. Christley!

www.eventbrite.com/e/2025-polit...

13.08.2025 18:42 πŸ‘ 8 πŸ” 10 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 2

Padilla received more six times as many votes in the last general election than Noem has in every general election she’s run in combined.

13.06.2025 04:25 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

More Americans voted for Senator Alex Padilla than for 48 of the 53 red state GOP U.S. Senators combined.

12.06.2025 18:59 πŸ‘ 11555 πŸ” 3525 πŸ’¬ 16 πŸ“Œ 155

The Democratic Party is actually pretty effective under strict institutional norms and rules. They whip votes and submit to leaders despite a big tent and diverse base

When the norms and rules don’t apply (like now), the Democratic Party is a deer in the headlights

10.06.2025 22:39 πŸ‘ 2860 πŸ” 376 πŸ’¬ 149 πŸ“Œ 44

Would this be an interstate compact requiring congressional approval?

10.04.2025 22:59 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

David Brooks, who holds no advance degrees but has nevertheless served as a visiting professor at both Duke and Yale -- solely on the basis of his conservative ideas -- thinks that universities are deeply unfair to conservative thinkers.

07.04.2025 12:00 πŸ‘ 5114 πŸ” 1016 πŸ’¬ 219 πŸ“Œ 49

We are speedrunning the Declaration of Independence, folks.

04.04.2025 23:11 πŸ‘ 11086 πŸ” 3410 πŸ’¬ 166 πŸ“Œ 90

We simply had to intentionally destroy the world’s strongest economy while dismantling our scientific and educational infrastructure to ensure that a team with a trans girl would never finish second place in the Mountain West volleyball standings again

02.04.2025 22:30 πŸ‘ 23365 πŸ” 7126 πŸ’¬ 150 πŸ“Œ 163
Post image

It's 1828. The United States has adopted the highest tariff rate of the century for insane and idiotic reasons.

It's 1929. The United States has adopted the highest tariff rate of the century for insane and idiotic reasons.

It's 2025. The United States has adopted the highest tariff rate of the ce

02.04.2025 23:57 πŸ‘ 7359 πŸ” 1687 πŸ’¬ 100 πŸ“Œ 58
Title: Both Liberal and Conservative Judges Rule Against Trump
Description: A scatter plot showing the rulings of judges against or in favor of Trump, categorized by ideology using the DIME score. The x-axis represents Judge Ideology (DIME Score), ranging from liberal (-1) to conservative (1), and the y-axis represents the case outcome (against or for Trump).
	β€’	Blue dots represent liberal judges, purple dots represent moderate judges, and red dots represent conservative judges.
	β€’	Some judges are labeled, including Rudolph Contreras, Lauren King, John Coughenour, and James Emanuel Boasberg on the liberal to moderate side, and Carl Nichols, Richard J. Leon, and Joseph N. Laplante on the conservative side.
	β€’	A note mentions that Boasberg, though slightly right-leaning, was initially appointed by George W. Bush.
	β€’	The visualization suggests that judges from both ideological backgrounds ruled against Trump.

Title: Both Liberal and Conservative Judges Rule Against Trump Description: A scatter plot showing the rulings of judges against or in favor of Trump, categorized by ideology using the DIME score. The x-axis represents Judge Ideology (DIME Score), ranging from liberal (-1) to conservative (1), and the y-axis represents the case outcome (against or for Trump). β€’ Blue dots represent liberal judges, purple dots represent moderate judges, and red dots represent conservative judges. β€’ Some judges are labeled, including Rudolph Contreras, Lauren King, John Coughenour, and James Emanuel Boasberg on the liberal to moderate side, and Carl Nichols, Richard J. Leon, and Joseph N. Laplante on the conservative side. β€’ A note mentions that Boasberg, though slightly right-leaning, was initially appointed by George W. Bush. β€’ The visualization suggests that judges from both ideological backgrounds ruled against Trump.

1/🧡 Judges across ideological lines are ruling against Trump at strikingly similar rates (84% liberal, 86% centrist, 82% conservative). This isn't partisan opposition to Trumpβ€”it's the judiciary functioning as intended by cutting across partisan lines to uphold the Constitution.

18.03.2025 21:32 πŸ‘ 11576 πŸ” 3840 πŸ’¬ 190 πŸ“Œ 297

Morally, Roberts deserves every ounce of dunking he gets several hundred times over. But practically, if democracy is going to be saved it's going to require many people like Roberts saying many things like this.

18.03.2025 17:08 πŸ‘ 109 πŸ” 23 πŸ’¬ 8 πŸ“Œ 0

Imagine going back in time like 10 years and trying to explain to people that Ted Cruz said the coolest thing he’s ever seen is an electric car and then having to explain that this actually indicative of how very bad things are.

14.03.2025 20:05 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0
11.03.2025 17:39 πŸ‘ 1766 πŸ” 717 πŸ’¬ 16 πŸ“Œ 22

Lawrence is tough competition.

04.03.2025 19:40 πŸ‘ 1 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0

STUDENT: This is my last semester, and I have to say, you are the best dressed professor I’ve had here.
ME: Have you had @profjslewis.bsky.social?
STUDENT: Yes.

04.03.2025 18:37 πŸ‘ 3 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 1 πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

"Have you said thank you even once?"

01.03.2025 13:32 πŸ‘ 3790 πŸ” 980 πŸ’¬ 31 πŸ“Œ 53

HEY EVERYONE REMEMBER WHEN TRUMP WAS IMPEACHED FOR DENYING AID TO UKRAINE BECAUSE HE WANTED ZELENSKY TO LIE AND SAY BAD THINGS ABOUT BIDEN AND ZELENKSY WOULDN’T DO IT?

Maybe literally one fucking American newspapers could mention this in their, β€œthink pieces,” about what happened yesterday.

01.03.2025 18:33 πŸ‘ 30491 πŸ” 8571 πŸ’¬ 409 πŸ“Œ 294

Seriously thinking of making my judicial process students respond this on the final exam.

26.02.2025 02:13 πŸ‘ 2 πŸ” 0 πŸ’¬ 0 πŸ“Œ 0
Post image

He really struggles with the concept of a constitutional republic with judicial review.

26.02.2025 01:40 πŸ‘ 11443 πŸ” 1949 πŸ’¬ 1407 πŸ“Œ 248
Screenshot of a Trump EO, white text on a dark blue background, which reads β€œPRESIDENTIAL ACTIONS: COMMENCING THE REDUCTION OF THE FEDERAL BUREAUCRACY
ECEXUTIVE [sic] ORDER
February 19, 2025

Screenshot of a Trump EO, white text on a dark blue background, which reads β€œPRESIDENTIAL ACTIONS: COMMENCING THE REDUCTION OF THE FEDERAL BUREAUCRACY ECEXUTIVE [sic] ORDER February 19, 2025

I see they started with the copyeditors.

20.02.2025 20:47 πŸ‘ 1370 πŸ” 239 πŸ’¬ 37 πŸ“Œ 24
Scatterplot titled β€œEmpirical Evidence of Ideological Targeting in Federal Layoffs: Agencies seen as liberal are significantly more likely to face DOGE layoffs.”
	β€’	The x-axis represents Perceived Ideological Leaning of federal agencies, ranging from -2 (Most Liberal) to +2 (Most Conservative), based on survey responses from over 1,500 federal executives.
	β€’	The y-axis shows Agency Size (Number of Staff) on a logarithmic scale from 1,000 to 1,000,000.

Each point represents a federal agency:
	β€’	Red dots indicate agencies that experienced DOGE layoffs.
	β€’	Gray dots indicate agencies with no layoffs.

Key Observations:
	β€’	Liberal-leaning agencies (left side of the plot) are disproportionately represented among red dots, indicating higher layoff rates.
	β€’	Notable targeted agencies include:
	β€’	HHS (Health & Human Services)
	β€’	EPA (Environmental Protection Agency)
	β€’	NIH (National Institutes of Health)
	β€’	CFPB (Consumer Financial Protection Bureau)
	β€’	Dept. of Education
	β€’	USAID (U.S. Agency for International Development)
	β€’	The National Nuclear Security Administration (DOE), despite its conservative leaning (+1 on the scale), is an exception among targeted agencies.
	β€’	A notable outlier: the Department of Veterans Affairs (moderately conservative) also faced layoffs despite its size.

Takeaway:

The figure visually demonstrates that DOGE layoffs disproportionately targeted liberal-leaning agencies, supporting claims of ideological bias. The pattern reveals that layoffs were not driven by agency size or budget alone but were strongly associated with perceived ideology.

Source: Richardson, Clinton, & Lewis (2018). Elite Perceptions of Agency Ideology and Workforce Skill. The Journal of Politics, 80(1).

Scatterplot titled β€œEmpirical Evidence of Ideological Targeting in Federal Layoffs: Agencies seen as liberal are significantly more likely to face DOGE layoffs.” β€’ The x-axis represents Perceived Ideological Leaning of federal agencies, ranging from -2 (Most Liberal) to +2 (Most Conservative), based on survey responses from over 1,500 federal executives. β€’ The y-axis shows Agency Size (Number of Staff) on a logarithmic scale from 1,000 to 1,000,000. Each point represents a federal agency: β€’ Red dots indicate agencies that experienced DOGE layoffs. β€’ Gray dots indicate agencies with no layoffs. Key Observations: β€’ Liberal-leaning agencies (left side of the plot) are disproportionately represented among red dots, indicating higher layoff rates. β€’ Notable targeted agencies include: β€’ HHS (Health & Human Services) β€’ EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) β€’ NIH (National Institutes of Health) β€’ CFPB (Consumer Financial Protection Bureau) β€’ Dept. of Education β€’ USAID (U.S. Agency for International Development) β€’ The National Nuclear Security Administration (DOE), despite its conservative leaning (+1 on the scale), is an exception among targeted agencies. β€’ A notable outlier: the Department of Veterans Affairs (moderately conservative) also faced layoffs despite its size. Takeaway: The figure visually demonstrates that DOGE layoffs disproportionately targeted liberal-leaning agencies, supporting claims of ideological bias. The pattern reveals that layoffs were not driven by agency size or budget alone but were strongly associated with perceived ideology. Source: Richardson, Clinton, & Lewis (2018). Elite Perceptions of Agency Ideology and Workforce Skill. The Journal of Politics, 80(1).

The DOGE firings have nothing to do with β€œefficiency” or β€œcutting waste.” They’re a direct push to weaken federal agencies perceived as liberal. This was evident from the start, and now the data confirms it: targeted agencies overwhelmingly those seen as more left-leaning. πŸ§΅β¬‡οΈ

20.02.2025 02:18 πŸ‘ 10678 πŸ” 4785 πŸ’¬ 252 πŸ“Œ 397
Elon Musk & @elonmusk
Follow
The REAL reason so many Democrats are upset about entitlements (social security, medical, etc) fraud investigations is that they are using your taxpayer money as handouts to attract and retain ILLEGAL immigrants. Their future voters.
That's what it's all about.
Truth.
10:48 AM β€’ 2/17/25 β€’ 7.7M Views

Elon Musk & @elonmusk Follow The REAL reason so many Democrats are upset about entitlements (social security, medical, etc) fraud investigations is that they are using your taxpayer money as handouts to attract and retain ILLEGAL immigrants. Their future voters. That's what it's all about. Truth. 10:48 AM β€’ 2/17/25 β€’ 7.7M Views

Now that musk is saying he’s doing the DOGE stuff β€œbecause the globalists have plotted a Great Replacement in which they use government handouts to buy votes from illegal immigrants and urban blacks” maybe we don’t have to act like this is about deficits or cost cutting anymore

17.02.2025 23:03 πŸ‘ 12314 πŸ” 3503 πŸ’¬ 722 πŸ“Œ 352
Post image

the single most un-american and anti-constitutional statement ever uttered by an american president

15.02.2025 18:39 πŸ‘ 97810 πŸ” 21309 πŸ’¬ 5355 πŸ“Œ 2360