A historic document.
A historic document.
Human interaction is going to shift to discords and group chats, invite-only. The open web and social media are going to be left for the agents lurking amongst the ruins. Everything public will be Moltbook.
It hasn’t fully hit BlueSky yet, but LinkedIn and X are just meaning-shaped comments by LLMs
What a time to live in
Everyone was so hyped about Moltbook as “the first social network for AI agents,” while the real social network for AI agents is LinkedIn.
Very debatable. It totally depends on what’s more tolerable in your situation: having some data slightly outdated vs. doing more I/O operations.
This is why I switched to Brave
The year is 2040. You’re living under the Anthroogle Protectorate. You’re all out of HumanCoin, and the next drop isn’t until next week, so you’re stuck with Genie 9 sims for now (audiovisual only). It’s okay though, because Claude’s World is streaming tonight. And you love that guy
Definitely feeling it, everyone just hang onto your board. 🏄 justinjackson.ca/claude-code
Now with AI agents running continuously in their loop (like Openclaw), things are getting spicy again. Prompt injections can trigger deep changes in their internals, manipulate their goals, exfiltrate data.
nolanlawson.com/2026/02/07/w...
Just finished my new article aimed at helping developers who are still struggling to start using AI agents in their day-to-day work. Sometimes all you need is a very concrete, step-by-step example, and I hope this piece can become exactly that.
Sharing is appreciated.
Watching videos titled "X is the best model" is a huge waste of time, now more than ever
Just choose what fits best for your specific problem and get the work done!
In 2026, you don't need to pretend to be a "researcher" to solve business problems in the AI/ML stack: ML models for most problems are already created and implemented, agentic frameworks are written, and LLM vendors offer a variety of models for every use case and budget.
AI/ML departments should be managed not in a “Google Research” style but as development departments with a specialized stack. They should be just another team in the row of other R&D teams like backend, frontend, QA, etc. With narrowly scoped tasks, clear technical requirements, and strict deadlines
In most companies, the picture looks very different from the stakeholders' point of view: they invest in a new technology stack, expect a fast ROI, and want results quickly given the amount they are spending.
The problem is that true research departments are venture investments by definition, and this is a privilege that only huge enterprises can afford: you put some extra cash into hiring PhD grads, give them a wide scope of problems in the hope that, maybe, some of their findings will bring you ROI.
A few thoughts about managing the AI/ML engineering process.
The big problem I see is when group managers of AI/ML departments in small‑mid‑size companies treat their teams as research groups.
Also, I’d be happy to hear how things are going with Lumo. Are you planning to develop this product further, or is the ROI not great and it might be shut down?
The whole Moltbook story perfectly illustrates why I never rush to play with the latest “hot” things. I prefer to wait until early adopters, who seemingly have more free time than I do, figure out whether something is worth investment of my time
Got burning questions about Proton Mail?
Join our AMA on r/ProtonMail tomorrow, February 5th at 11am CET, with our Director of Engineering and Product Lead.
Not on Reddit? We'll pull your best questions from here 👇
Do you have plans to integrate Standard Notes, or at least include it in the paid plan? It feels odd paying for it separately since you've already purchased it.
there's proton wallet for crypto
Thirty percent of my job involves tech leadership, where I dig into existing code and write technical specs for developers, and I use Cursor heavily for it. I can't even imagine how many resources would be needed to develop a tool like this internally.