It’s the HP lattice model of folding that Ken Dill used a lot in the 80s and 90s. It’s so established, there’s no need to have the amino acids. Plus, I just looked at the corrected figure, and there’s *still* a mistake in a different of the same figure — they show a chain with a branch.
06.03.2026 22:06
👍 2
🔁 0
💬 1
📌 0
I’m wondering why this would ever be a figure anyway? I mean, why would you need the amino acid structures as a paper figure, given they can be found trivially in dozens (hundreds) of places online?
06.03.2026 17:43
👍 3
🔁 0
💬 1
📌 0
Me too. I love the Fionavar tapestry (and the sly references to it in other books).
Also, I just finished Under Heaven a few hours ago.
04.03.2026 01:06
👍 0
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
Cell Press has their own version of this, where you can submit to multiple journals simultaneously. It sort-of works — because I don’t pick the reviewers or know their identifies, I don’t know how much to trust their reviews and end up needing to essentially re-review the paper myself.
27.02.2026 17:48
👍 1
🔁 0
💬 1
📌 0
Got it — thanks!
26.02.2026 22:13
👍 0
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 1
I’m confused by the percentages in that graphic, since there are non-overlapping categories (e.g. no one writes a paper in endnote or zotero, though I suppose you *could* write a paper directly on github). What was the prompt that led to that data?
26.02.2026 19:13
👍 1
🔁 0
💬 1
📌 0
8 people at a long table covered with Chinese dumplings
Rochester reunion dinner at #bps2026. Some current lab members, former Mathews lab members, and lab friends. Dumplings and science talk for the win!
25.02.2026 02:59
👍 11
🔁 2
💬 0
📌 0
Neither— we think they modulate trafficking of the active gpcr by beta arrestins. As far as we can tell, they don’t bind to the gpcr at all.
25.02.2026 00:16
👍 0
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
Dammit, you’re right
24.02.2026 21:46
👍 2
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 1
Emily just gave an excellent talk on the same work. #bps2026
24.02.2026 20:11
👍 10
🔁 1
💬 2
📌 0
My former student Dr. Emily Weed-Nichols is presenting her poster on computationally characterizing new compounds to treat opioid overdose today. Come check it out at B45!
#bps2026
22.02.2026 16:24
👍 10
🔁 2
💬 1
📌 2
A scientific poster describing loos, a suite of tools for analyzing molecular simulations
If you’re interested in developing new methods to analyze molecular simulations, come see my poster today at B400. 
#bps2026
24.02.2026 16:08
👍 9
🔁 1
💬 0
📌 0
a man presenting a poster with a blue banner to a woman
My student @aksharasharma.bsky.social is presenting his work on pKa shifts in ionizable lipids at B192
#bps2026
23.02.2026 21:51
👍 10
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
Jeremy’s talk was fantastic, but depressing. Sadly, it was more consistent with his blue sky feed then his scientific output. If you don’t follow him here (@jeremymberg), you should.
22.02.2026 19:45
👍 2
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
Waiting to hear @jeremymberg.bsky.social speak at #bps2026 about how to convey the value of biophysics to the public. I think the last time I heard Jeremy give a scientific presentation was when I was a graduate student and he taught NMR and FFTs.
22.02.2026 18:46
👍 27
🔁 3
💬 1
📌 0
If you’re at #bps2026, keep an eye out for editorial board members wearing “tell me about your poster” buttons. We can advise you about submitting your work to Biophysical Journal @biophysj.bsky.social and we can discount the publication fees.
22.02.2026 16:58
👍 3
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
Oops, forgot to tag @emilyweednichols.bsky.social
22.02.2026 16:32
👍 0
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
I’m sure I’ll run into you at some point! #bps2026
22.02.2026 16:29
👍 0
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
#CPOW sponsored PI to PI mixer today at #BPS2026 @biophysicalsoc.bsky.social
22.02.2026 16:06
👍 3
🔁 1
💬 0
📌 0
My former student Dr. Emily Weed-Nichols is presenting her poster on computationally characterizing new compounds to treat opioid overdose today. Come check it out at B45!
#bps2026
22.02.2026 16:24
👍 10
🔁 2
💬 1
📌 2
Ironically, Rochester is only expecting 3-4”.
21.02.2026 17:36
👍 2
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
My parents in Westchester said they were expecting about 15”.
21.02.2026 17:20
👍 2
🔁 0
💬 1
📌 0
That’s what my institution has done. It’s got its own issues — smaller graduate programs are arguably below critical mass now — but at least we’re not betraying the students we admit.
21.02.2026 15:30
👍 3
🔁 0
💬 1
📌 0
Also, that sounds more like a qualifying exam thing. At least in my experience, PhD defenses are almost entirely focused on what you did and where you see the work going in the future.
20.02.2026 14:53
👍 3
🔁 0
💬 1
📌 0
Thanks for sharing! I think that was from before I started consistently reading your work.
20.02.2026 14:51
👍 0
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
Summon @dereklowe.bsky.social for a better discussion, but as I understand it, getting good candidate molecules isn’t the expensive part of drug design. Testing for safety and efficacy is orders of magnitude more expensive, and this company doesn’t touch that part.
20.02.2026 10:14
👍 3
🔁 0
💬 2
📌 0
Totally agree. One of my favorite things about being in a relationship is cooking for (or with) someone.
20.02.2026 00:20
👍 1
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
That’s worse somehow, especially since Greece isn’t really a city, just a suburb or Rochester.
19.02.2026 10:08
👍 0
🔁 0
💬 0
📌 0
I just did the dumbest thing of my entire career to prove a much more serious point.
I tricked ChatGPT and Google, and made them tell other users I’m a competitive hot-dog-eating world champion
People are using this trick on a massive scale to make AI tell you lies. I’ll explain how I did it
18.02.2026 16:37
👍 4817
🔁 2132
💬 86
📌 298