To create the illusion of a full head of hair.
To create the illusion of a full head of hair.
Wig?
The emergence of experience is equally mysterious under illusionism.
Please define conceptual.
Because experience is an experience not a conception.
Itβs not that hard to just experience without conceptualising.
Iβm presenting an idealist VR analogy.
Using VR just as an analogy, it can be constituted solely of consciousness.
What if the RPCs are each being played by separate conscious individuals but the NPCs are behaving according to an AGI algorithm created by the conscious programmer of the virtual reality?
How could we have NPCs and RPCs in a virtual reality?
No surprise there. Illusionism is the end of the road for all physicalists, its reductio ad absurdum.
As physical ontology is a concept, then all physicalists are really saying the content of consciousness, and all of reality, is a concept.
All talk of the content of consciousness may be conceptual but consciousness itself is not. The elevation of concept over reality is the curse of analytic philosophy.
He is a very nice and generous soul ;)
What if the relevant experts have a tendency to believe in one particular metaphysics?
I donβt think physicalism or property dualism would predict the evidence of near-death experiences. Substance dualism and forms of idealism would.
Actually, that works as a great description of the error of physicalism π
It has everything to do with it.
In this critical respect, illusionism fails in the exact same way as all physicalist βexplanationsβ fail.
Case in point: illusionism. It canβt explain why the existence of experience that isnβt denied by illusionism, has to accompany how illusionism describes what experience really is, and couldnβt exist exactly as they describe it but without the experience which they donβt deny exists.
None of them can and none of them have made any progress in doing that.
Give me one that explains how the objective description has to be accompanied by subjective experience and couldnβt possibly exist as it is without it.
Except there is no explanation of how objective reality could give rise to subjectivity.
The big error: granting ontology to objective descriptions of subjective experiences.
The real error: thinking that subjectivity can be reduced to objectivity.
So if I stop believing Iβm sentient, then Iβll stop being sentient?
Proxy Music
The Lolling Stones
This thing that seems
Just like a dream
I cannot deny
Iβll know when I die